News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Huntlee proposal gains momentum 

Huntlee proposal gains momentum

22 Jul, 2010 04:00 AM
The state's biggest housing project, the $1.8 billion Huntlee New Town at Branxton, is back on the agenda.

The proposal has been declared potentially "state significant", and fresh project applications are expected to be lodged by the end of next month.

But already the development and the state government's handling of it are again attracting debate, this time over the fee the NSW Planning Department will apply for processing the applications.

Documents posted late yesterday on the department's website show the development, to house up to 20,000 people, is being considered for "state significant" listing.

The project effectively collapsed last year when then planning minister Kristina Keneally conceded she breached the law in endorsing the project's concept plan and rezoning because her predecessor had signed a land-swap memorandum of understanding.

It followed a NSW Land and Environment Court decision that deemed a similar arrangement for development at Catherine Hill Bay constituted a "land bribe".

Proponent LWP Property managing director Danny Murphy said yesterday he hoped the Huntlee project could get back on track, and fresh applications would be made within two months.

Mr Murphy said the new proposal would be much the same as what was initially proposed.

The public documents show the project still entails dedication of conservation land at the Huntlee site and elsewhere in the region.

An internal department email, recently tabled to state parliament, referred to a staffer ringing Mr Murphy to advise the processing fee for any new application "would be approx $70k".

Cessnock Greens councillor James Ryan said he understood the full fee for Huntlee should be about $620,000, meaning NSW taxpayers were effectively covering the rest.

A department spokesman said it acknowledged substantial work had already been done to assess the site, and would charge for a new application accordingly.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
both Singleton and Cessnock council should tell the developers "the land is all yours you build and maintain all the infrastructures in Huntlee" also it MUST be compulsory that all waste water must not leave the area and that it MUST be recycled continually throughout the town as toilet water or garden use. NOW is an excellent opportunity for the Government to make this mandatory for this and all future big developments within the state.
Posted by jacks, 22/07/2010 6:53:18 AM, on The Herald
maybe if the State Gov didn't charge as much in the first place building blocks would be a lot cheaper..
Posted by charlie, 22/07/2010 6:55:58 AM, on The Herald
How about the first future block owners cover the full costs of the development. I regard that NSW TAXPAYERS should NOT have to pay ANYTHING for the development as they will not receive ANY BENEFIT from it!!!
Posted by Paul Muddle , Dora Ck, 22/07/2010 7:57:56 AM, on The Herald
This is a great development and a major move forward for the Hunter Region. Certainly transport will be a major issue. The heavy rail link to Newcastle Station will now be absolutely essential as will a major passenger upgrade to Singleton and beyond.
Posted by Spinner, 22/07/2010 8:33:02 AM, on The Herald
please explain why we are covering the part-costs of a development application? paul muddle is right on to it and absolutely right...
Posted by judgedredd, 22/07/2010 4:29:57 PM, on The Herald
Spinner - You are "right on" about one thing - the need for infrastructure FIRST. You have to be dreaming if you think this will happen. That's one of the main reasons this development has been questioned - stuck out in the middle of nowhere with limited community facilities and access. Public transport should be Number 1 in this day and age. Why should NSW taxpayers foot the $550,000 deficit when all the profits just go to the developer. Cheaper blocks - dreaming again!
Posted by maybalene, 22/07/2010 5:39:13 PM, on The Herald
it does still does not explain how a development ranked at the bottom of suitable future developmentby the state government was suddenly moved to the top
Posted by john, 22/07/2010 6:48:59 PM, on The Herald
Where can I find a copy of the suitable future development list by the state government???
Posted by Elfman, 24/08/2010 10:05:21 AM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...