News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 I won't budge: landowner says no to mine 

I won't budge: landowner says no to mine

09 Mar, 2009 08:02 AM
SHE is the last substantial landowner in an area being slowly swallowed by open-cut coalmining.

But despite the millions of dollars expected to be offered for her slice of Camberwell, 75-year-old Wendy Bowman is standing firm, insisting she will not sell until the mining giants or the State Government pledge $2 million to a study on the effects of coalmining on Upper Hunter communities.

Ashton Coal would have to buy Mrs Bowman's 190-hectare property to fully realise its plans for two new open-cut areas south of the New England Highway, opposite the tiny village.

The coalminer has already bought about 35 of the 50 village residences it made offers on.

Mrs Bowman said she feared the new open-cuts would force out the remaining residents, spelling the end of the historic hamlet.

"I'm not going to be responsible for wrecking that whole village," Mrs Bowman said. "It will choke on the dust of the new mines."

She has had her property valued and, while not wanting to give an exact figure, agreed it would fetch "several millions of dollars".

Ashton Coal is yet to make a formal offer. Brian Flannery, managing director of Felix Resources, which part-owns Ashton, said the company was waiting for Mrs Bowman to return its calls.

He said the company was not planning an expansion, but rather was looking to continue its open-cut production at two new sites, which were crucial to it maintaining its 160-strong workforce into the future.

Ashton has argued the mine has no health effects on the community.

Mrs Bowman said she would ignore any offers until the effects of mining on the region were known.

The Planning Department said in December last year it would commission an independent study of the cumulative effects of mining on Camberwell.

Mrs Bowman has welcomed the study but wants an Upper Hunter-wide examination of the health effects of mining.

She also wants the Department of Environment and Climate Change to move two real-time air-quality monitors from the Lower Hunter to the Upper Hunter.

The department said population densities at Singleton and Muswellbrook did not justify such a move and that major mines in the area were required to operate more than 30 of their own air filters.

But it acknowledged data from the mines' filters was "not readily accessible" to the public and said it was working with the industry to improve access

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Wendy has been forced to move once and her t-shirt should read "I will not be moved a second time". I hope that the people of the whole Hunter Valley support Wendy in her stand. She is a true champion of the Hunter and what she stands for is of regional and national importance. Beyond Wendy and Camberwell, the Upper Hunter is now the sacrificial anode of the State of NSW. It is being slowly destroyed by mining and pollution and its potential to remain productive and generate real, long-term (sustainable) jobs is being severely compromised. Agri-culture that employs thousands of people in clean and healthy activities such as viticulture, grazing, horse studs, dairying and cropping is being pushed out by a single industry that damages human and ecosystem health. Just remember, that in the end, you cannot eat coal and you cannot grow food in toxic voids and spoil mountains. If we critically examine the local, regional and now global impacts of the coal industry on the health of humans, ecosystems and now, the global climate, we should rapidly come to the conclusion that it is already hugely negative. To continue to expand the industry in the face of such knowledge is ethically bankrupt. Moreover, to fail to carefully monitor and mitigate the human and ecological impacts of existing damaging industrial activity is an abrogation of duty on the part of public officials in the relevant areas of responsibility. Do we actually support healthy budgets and royalties over and above the health of people and ecosystems? It is time to take a stand against the expansion of the coal industry and support Wendy in her cause. Ultimately, Wendy’s stand is for the health of people and places in the Hunter of the future. They, as yet, do not appear on the balance sheets nor the electoral role.
Posted by Glenn, 9/03/2009 10:08:08 AM
A very interesting commentary Glenn. I do notice that as with most anti mining campainers such as yourself you neglect to face some home truths about the current world we live in. The ecoystem destruction that you so easliy associate with the mining industry is prevelent throughout agriculture. Around 400,000ha of native vegetation is cleared each year in Australia of which mining activities account for a meager 2%. In the Hunter Valley the clearing of riparian vegetation along many of the main water sources for cattle grazing has caused severe problems with erosion and sedimentation of the waterways. Runnoff water from cropping and grazing areas contains high nutrient levels which lead to nitrification and algal blooms. The number one cause for dryland salinity is land clearing for agricultural purposes. The rapid expansion of towns across the Hunter including Singleton, Muswellbrook and Maitland is largely the result of the expansion of mining over the past 10 years in the Hunter Valley. I appreciate that all industries have some form of impact on their surroundings however it is disappointing that the impacts of mining are magnified 1000 times for the gain of anti mining campainers. In the Hunter hundreds of thousands of dollars are injected into projects to reduce the impacts of mining and rehabilitate the damage caused to land by both mining and agriculture alike. I dont believe that creating a massive divide between the mining and agricultural industries is the best way to approach the issues that we currently face.
Posted by Hunter Valley Resident, 9/03/2009 11:18:26 AM
Hunter Valley Resident needs to take a drive through the Upper Hunter - e.g. Howick or Ravensworth - and check out the irreparable landscape damage caused by open cut mining. We know from scientific research that ecosystems in some of these areas are now stuffed and the most conspicuous thing you will notice are a succession of massive mines dominating the landscape. Have a look at the region from Google earth and you will see just how far the scarred landscape left by cheap open cut mining has spread. If you can see this from space, it's big!
Posted by Frank, 9/03/2009 12:21:08 PM
A survey of 350 households within 5km of open cut coal mining activity near Gloucester NSW showed more than 50% of respondents believed their health to have been damaged by the mining. We need a parliamentary enquiry into health damage from coal mining and a health survey and ongoing monitoring of each affected community
Posted by Steve R, 9/03/2009 12:21:51 PM
it is way overdue that we focus on the green economy not the greed economy! We cant eat money. good on you wendy, more strength to you!
Posted by opencuts nevaheal, 9/03/2009 1:07:00 PM
Are the mining companies required to replace topsoil and re-vegetate after the coal is removed? If not, that should be a minimum requirement. Kudos to Wendy Bowman for her efforts, coal is an insidious product, including the inappropriately-named "clean coal".
Posted by Ozzie, 9/03/2009 1:35:09 PM
To Hunter Valley Resident. Glenn is not causing the divide. The coal mining legislation and the Part 3A provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 cause the divide. Australia has some of the most invasive mining legislation in the western world. It is draconian in its nature and ultimately allows private property to be taken from the owners when the full implications of the law are considered. The agricultural industry is working hard to meet modern environmental standards, the mining industry continues on its arrogant path of considering itself above the social and environmental requirements of our nation.
Posted by Garry S, 9/03/2009 1:35:48 PM
Such pious comments. Bottom line. How much does a family earn from coal rights and sales of land to coal miners over the years? How much of that was forced? Yes, like Europe, one day it will be viable rural land again. Your computer does not run on clean or dirty air!
Posted by Noprivatecoalrights, 9/03/2009 1:37:06 PM
Shades of THE CASTLE movie. Give Bud Tingwell a ring or Darrell
Posted by stuartk, 9/03/2009 1:37:59 PM
Shades of THE CASTLE movie. Give Bud Tingwell a ring or Darrell
Posted by stuartk, 9/03/2009 1:44:16 PM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
 FIRM: Wendy Bowman, at her Camberwell property, says she will not sell until a study on the effects of coalmining has been done.- Picture by Kitty Hill
FIRM: Wendy Bowman, at her Camberwell property, says she will not sell until a study on the effects of coalmining has been done.- Picture by Kitty Hill
HOMES BOUGHT UP: The village of Camberwell is surrounded by open-cut coalmining.
HOMES BOUGHT UP: The village of Camberwell is surrounded by open-cut coalmining.

Most popular articles


 
Landcom Sanctuary 190512
 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...