News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Intruders suspected in Civic Hotel blaze 

Intruders suspected in Civic Hotel blaze

03 Jul, 2009 05:00 AM
NEWCASTLE City Council has denied any knowledge of squatters using parts of the council-owned Civic Hotel, which has been badly damaged by fire.

Detectives suspect squatters are responsible for the blaze that caused structural damage to the building after flames took hold of several floors on Wednesday night.

Experts believe that an electrical fault was not the cause.

They believe someone using the building's upper storeys started the fire on the first floor, but it may never be known if it was intentional or accidental after candles or small fires used for light and warmth burnt out of control.

Structural and technical inspections will be done in the next week to decide the building's future.

The Herald has been told the council was alerted last year to evidence, including makeshift beds, of squatters using the building's disused upper storeys. The rooms were emptied, electricity cut and entries boarded up.

However, a council spokeswoman said last night there was no record of council officers being told of the presence of squatters.

The council has taken a strong stance against several private developers who have allowed inner-city buildings to fall into disrepair, attracting squatters and vandals.

The council bought the Civic Hotel freehold in 2007 and owns all land facing Hunter Street between the Civic Theatre and Auckland Street, behind City Hall and University House.

The land has been earmarked for an ambitious joint development between the council and the University of Newcastle.

Fire crews spent four hours bringing the fire under control after patrolling police saw smoke billowing from the historic hotel after 11pm on Wednesday.

The top floor has been destroyed and several other floors significantly damaged.

The ground floor has suffered some fire damage and smoke and water damage.

Windows into the floors above the ground-floor hotel were found open yesterday.

Licensee Paul Provost said the TAB and poker machines area had been badly damaged, and it was too early to predict when his eight staff could return to work.

"I don't know how to describe it. It is a hindrance, that's for sure," Mr Provost said.

A council spokeswoman said in a statement that a preliminary damage assessment showed roof sheeting could be dislodged if forecast strong wind eventuated.

"As a precaution the adjoining vacant site to the east has been cordoned off," the statement said.

Council officers would inspect the building and report on any structural damage next week.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This could eventually happen to all the buildings in Newcastle, on the dead end of the peninsula. We must demolish them as it happens, so they do not become venues for more squatters who ride on the train.
Posted by Jim, 3/07/2009 8:50:26 AM
Council need to clear all the buildings that it owns that are commercially vacant and of poor appearance. A good tempory use would be for parking.
Posted by Bigfeller, 3/07/2009 9:17:50 AM
You will find if the water rate and land rates are being paid. Until an order is made they cannot do a thing Squatters that ride on trains. They are to busy looking for places along the way so they walk...NOT RIDE TRAIN
Posted by Get real, 3/07/2009 1:00:29 PM
The property owners will stop paying the water bill and the land rates when they get a clear signal that Newcastle is in shut-down mode. Tate and the council are prolonging the fateful truth so they can keep squeezing revenue from landholders who will never make a commercial return on their property.
Posted by Jim, 3/07/2009 2:32:56 PM
Once again it appears a case of do as I say and not as I do for NCC. It is interesting that the spokeswoman denies any knowledge of police report regarding squatters. Surely if action was taken to empty the rooms, cut off electricity and board them up there should be some record in council, even the direction to cut of electricity would need the authorisation of the owner. A interesting question to post is that as the damage was done to the top floor, how was access gained to this area, particularly if the ground floor was being used as licensed premises. Some answers and explanations are required from someone within NCC other than the current spokeswoman. With any luck the sustainability review when completed will recommend that all council properties not currently being used or for development within the near future be sold to alleviate the strain on the already overstretched budget. Alternatively the University could purchase it and proceed with its expansion plan as a sole developer rather than with financially strapped council.
Posted by Bazza, 3/07/2009 5:44:04 PM
Council Owned... How many times did they inspect the premsies since ownership? Squatters only move into places because they know of the lack of access by owners of the premsies they squat in... Bank corner, Newcastle post office, the Empire & the list will go on if you have a look at the loss of business owner in the CBD. If owners don't access their vacant building within Newcastle CBD regularly, expect this problem to occur, without a doubt !
Posted by Elmer fudd, 4/07/2009 1:25:01 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...