News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Labor councillors give up Laman St fig fight 

Labor councillors give up Laman St fig fight

08 Dec, 2011 05:06 AM
THE Laman Street fig trees are finally set for the chop after Newcastle Labor councillors effectively conceded defeat yesterday in the long-running and costly dispute.

Councillors Sharon Claydon, Tim Crakanthorp and Nuatali Nelmes said in a statement they would withdraw a key motion to close Laman Street to vehicular traffic, citing a lack of numbers within the council chamber and ongoing costs.

‘‘To prolong this situation any further is a waste of ratepayers’ money and resources,’’ the councillors said.

More significantly, the decision leaves Greens councillor Michael Osborne unable to lodge a rescission motion to stop the figs’ removal.

Three signatures are required, and the motion is only backed by Cr Osborne and lord mayor John Tate.

‘‘I was hoping one of the Labor councillors would sign [the rescission motion],’’ Cr Osborne said.

‘‘It’s very disappointing.’’

The fiasco has cost the council more than $1.5 million and involved 22 council debates.

It now appears extremely unlikely the future of the 14 fig trees will be debated again.

A council spokeswoman said yesterday it could now proceed with the removal of the trees ‘‘as soon as practical’’ in line with the vote from July.

But the Newcastle Herald understands it is unlikely that work will begin before the year’s end.

The council said a number of logistical factors needed to be considered. The city’s art gallery and library would need to be closed, and resistance to that idea was expected.

It is also unlikely that significant police resources will be available to support ‘‘Operation Beanstalk’’ over the Christmas period.

Cr Bob Cook welcomed the councillors’ decision and urged the council administration to proceed ‘‘as soon as possible’’.

Labor councillors advised council staff they would formally withdraw their plan late yesterday.

‘‘We acknowledge that we do not have the support of the majority of councillors and, as such, we will not proceed any further with our motion,’’ the statement said.

‘‘It is a matter of public record that seven councillors are in favour of wholesale removal of the Laman Street figs.

‘‘We are disappointed that our fellow councillors have been unwilling to support our attempts to resolve this issue ...

‘‘It has been made clear to us that even if our motion had been successful last night, opposing councillors would have immediately moved to rescind our motion, leaving the issue unresolved, rendering the site inoperative for many more months and allowing the costs to spiral further, with no end in sight.’’

Save Our Figs spokeswoman Fee Mozeley said the group was hopeful of finding a circuit breaker or state government intervention.

Cr Tate could not see any way that the council’s decision could be changed.

‘‘But we’ve had so many twists and turns, who knows what will happen next.’’

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
If there was ever to be State government intervention that should have have occured ages ago! Lets see what unfolds after the figs are gone. Edward James
Posted by Edward James, 8/12/2011 4:00:11 AM, on The Herald
NCC you are a disgrace. I believe there is a hidden agenda behind this mess.

Submitted via iPhone App

Posted by Andrew, 8/12/2011 4:41:13 AM
Wasting ONE POINT FIVE MILLION PLUS

won't stop the CHRISTMAS PARTY

Please Barry give the NCC the sack

Posted by Late mail, 8/12/2011 4:59:15 AM, on The Herald
At last sanity prevails, - & now these Crs are now saying " it is a waste of ratepayers money " - they were told this from the start !! why say it now? - lets hope Mr Tate talks with his SOF friends and advises them to stay away and let the work be completed safely & unhindered, But I believe this mob wont listen. Please C. Raschke & F .Moseley & supporters accept the decsion.
Posted by Novocastrian, 8/12/2011 5:01:19 AM, on The Herald
‘‘To prolong this situation any further is a waste of ratepayers’ money and resources,’’ the councillors said.

WELL DOH!

Bring em down!

Posted by dally-girl, 8/12/2011 5:04:40 AM, on The Herald
"We acknowledge that we do not have the support of the majority of councillors"

Hallelujah! At last democracy at work.

I hope they use appropriate force if the pro-fig protesters tie them selves to trees or attack workers or police.

Posted by tuffasnails, 8/12/2011 5:08:50 AM, on The Herald
'who knows what will happen next?' - I do Fee Mozley: more crap will happen with the stupid figs while the rest of the world goes about it's business.

Submitted via iPhone App

Posted by Fnord, 8/12/2011 5:15:16 AM
thank god for that bring on the chainsaws and stop wasting OUR money
Posted by dogs, 8/12/2011 5:22:53 AM, on The Herald
Nothing will bring me more joy this Christmas then to see these bloody Fig trees chopped down. Chop chop.
Posted by 1sandwichshort, 8/12/2011 5:27:27 AM, on The Herald
Do you people even know how many homeless people and children that money could have helped it's a total waste of tax payees money .

Submitted via iPhone App

Posted by Debbie smith, 8/12/2011 5:35:45 AM
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
01 November, 2011
26 October, 2011
09 November, 2011
01 December, 2011
15 November, 2011
02 November, 2011

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...