News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Lake Macquarie dunny days numbered 

Lake Macquarie dunny days numbered

21 Mar, 2011 03:00 AM
NINE public toilets are planned to be demolished in Lake Macquarie under a city council plan to upgrade, replace and close toilet blocks.

It costs the council $439,685 a year to clean 107 toilet blocks it keeps open 24 hours a day, a council report said.

The 2010-11 budget to repair public toilets is $175,936, with half of that cost due to vandalism and graffiti.

A council audit found 50 toilets in fair condition, 33 in good condition and 24 in poor condition.

"The majority of people do not expect councils will provide all public toilets," a council report said.

"Shopping centres, food outlets, entertainment venues and service stations are regular public-toilet providers."

Antisocial behaviour at public toilets included vandalism, graffiti, theft, assault, sexual activity, drug use and arson. Few of the toilets met the needs of disabled people.

The council had four employees to clean public toilets, with high-use toilets cleaned once a day. Insufficient cleaning led to complaints, so the report recommended 12 high-use toilets have two cleans daily.

The council received 3000 service requests a year and a quarter of those were for work on public toilets, mostly due to vandalism.

After examining 107 public toilets, the report recommended retaining 55, replacing 14, modifying or upgrading 11, demolishing nine, conducting safety assessments on nine, opening seven only when sport occurs at the site, and relocating two.

Councillors had listed public toilets as one area to be examined in a service review, which aimed to cut costs. The report said the closure of some toilets would reduce maintenance and cleaning costs, but the replacement, upgrade and extra cleaning of others would increase costs.

Councillors will vote tonight to call for public comment.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Bring back the coin operated ones.

Remember the attendant that use to be there in some of them, Many jokes were put out about it.Eg taking a holiday at his or her own convienence

Posted by Concerned Resident, 21/03/2011 7:40:44 AM, on The Herald
"Shopping centres, food outlets, entertainment venues and service stations are regular public-toilet providers." ...... so our Council is now deciding that public services such as public amenities should be provided by porivate business rather then a local public authority.

$439,685.... thats an average of $11 per toilet block a day. So in these times where Council claims to be looking for significant costs savings an entire report, its research and production found a way to save under $100 a day from Council costs.

Was the report really worth it? Or was it simply a means to an end to reduce the already low services in our local parks?


Posted by demon_aus, 21/03/2011 7:53:28 AM, on The Herald
Local, state and federal governments keep taking more of our money and deliver less and less every year.

Meanwhile the apathetic public stand idly by and watch the standard of service provided by the various levels of government sink lower and lower and lower.

It amazes me that people are prepared to accept this

Posted by Brando, 21/03/2011 8:33:37 AM, on The Herald
Why doesn't Lake Macquarie Council make public the costs of office renovation every time a new manager is appointed. $100 a day to keep public dunnies clean doesn't seem to much in comparison.
Posted by JB, 21/03/2011 1:17:36 PM, on The Herald
Shopping centers, food outlets, service stations, entertainment venues that are privately owned should provide toilets themselves. City Councils should provide toilets in parks and other recreation areas that are public properties.That's how it works all around the world. However, City Councils should still be responsible to monitor and check to ensure that those private companies do provide safe and clean toilets for their customers. It's true that those places have become no safe zones due to anti social behaviors, from sexual assaults to drug trafficking. Lack of security cameras have been giving vandals the chance to continue their illegal activities. Police force hasn't been able to ensure security, especially in and around shopping centers, food outlets. Although the Law against Littering was introduced in 2001, the Law against Graffiti was introduced in 2009, police force has failed to enforce the law. Littering and graffitti fines collected from the offenders could have been more than enough for the Councils to manage public toilets. Until the law against any kind of anti social behavior is enforced, shall we keep closing everything including the parks, as a solution?
Posted by FG, 21/03/2011 1:45:55 PM, on The Herald
How about we find the people who are damaging and abusing these facilities and put them in the stocks until they pay the costs they cause.
Posted by John R, 23/03/2011 10:02:34 AM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...