News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Laman Street fig trees fight continues 

Laman Street fig trees fight continues

15 Nov, 2011 03:00 AM
A NEWCASTLE City Council undertaking not to remove the Laman Street figs has been extended again while a judge considers whether to make an order preventing their removal ahead of a full court hearing.

Justice Peter Biscoe, of the NSW Land and Environment Court, reserved his decision yesterday on whether to grant an injunction to the Save Our Figs group.

The group is seeking a declaration that the council, specifically general manager Phil Pearce, failed to genuinely consider an offer from Premier Barry O’Farrell to provide on request a state government arborist to assess the trees.

The council says Mr Pearce was not bound to consider the utterings of a politician.

The issue is expected to be determined after another hearing, possibly early next month.

The council agreed yesterday not to resume removing the trees before 5pm on the day of the decision about the injunction.

The court heard that the council’s public liability insurance for the figs is expected to expire at the end of the month.

The council’s barrister, James Stevenson SC, told the court Statewide Mutual had agreed to extend the insurance until November 30, provided an exclusion zone around the trees remained in place. But the council had been told the insurer would be unwilling to give another extension.

‘‘And that might well be its own fault,’’ Save Our Figs barrister Tim Robertson SC responded.

He said Statewide Mutual had offered a risk assessment of the trees but the council had refused it.

Mr Stevenson said the insurer would have required all stakeholders to accept the assessment’s findings, which the council could not promise.

Justice Biscoe asked several times why the two parties had not opted to find another arborist to conduct an independent assessment that they both agreed should be done.

‘‘It just seems surprising, shall I say, that there can’t be an agreement or a formula where that person can be identified,’’ he said.

Mr Stevenson said the agreement stated that the assessment would not be done if arborist Lyndal Plant was not available.

Ms Plant’s employer subsequently objected to her conducting the assessment.

Under the Local Government Act, councillors cannot attempt to rescind a resolution to remove the trees before the end of this month.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I think this is an absolute joke like the council get the administrator in then John Tate can join SOF without upsetting the other councillors
Posted by wayne2290, 15/11/2011 4:26:08 AM, on The Herald
With the present fiasco over the fig trees, please don't let The Mayor and His "Honcho's" loose on the City Hall's Problems. Sadly the City Hall's problems are way out of their league.
Posted by fed-up, 15/11/2011 4:35:23 AM, on The Herald
A cynical observer might draw the conclusion that the independent arborist was not sought by NCC because a personal decision had been taken by an unknown officer to remove the trees & so an independent assessment might prevent this decision being enacted.

Regardless, the present motion to 'remove' the trees may not be not satisfied by Operation Beanstalk that only 'lops' the trees to a tombstone stump.

Posted by Machiavelli, 15/11/2011 4:59:07 AM, on The Herald
If your sick of this whole situation like so many of us are, come to civic park tonight at 630 and show council they have support for their decision and based on the evidence the figs need to be replaced

Surely the land and environment court will review the countless reports and investigations into the figs and realise council has made the right decision and haven't made this decision on a whim

Submitted via iPhone App

Posted by Megs, 15/11/2011 5:13:43 AM
Blah, Blah, Blah.
Posted by joker, 15/11/2011 5:30:41 AM, on The Herald
.... continued

Also a tree is not a square sail as is shown on one of the diagrams. I know a little about structural and aeronautical engineering and I think arborists are out of their field commenting on these things when they are judging stability. Its a structural engineers and aeronautical engineers speciality to assess stability and strength. An arborist can comment on weakness's of growth and diseased trees. The experts then factor those weakness (fromtree experts) into stability and risk evaluation. So in my opinion the present methodology is flawed and the reports not yet relevant to act on.

Posted by Master Sgnt Bilko, 15/11/2011 5:57:17 AM, on The Herald
oh dear...another wait
Posted by chopchop, 15/11/2011 7:03:05 AM, on The Herald
2 words INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT... oh & thank god for the trees in searing temps, at least the wildlife still have somewhere to go.
Posted by Ali, 15/11/2011 7:09:55 AM, on The Herald
Yet again, NCC fail at failing. You would think that they could get something right every now and then - if only by accident....


Posted by Scott Hillard, 15/11/2011 8:01:09 AM, on The Herald
@Ali, Yes 2 words: Already Done.
Posted by Terry, 15/11/2011 8:12:14 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
02 November, 2011
18 October, 2011
09 November, 2011
01 November, 2011

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...