News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 McKay attacks GPT rail claims 

McKay attacks GPT rail claims

16 Oct, 2008 10:54 PM
HUNTER Minister Jodi McKay has attacked The GPT Group, telling an Upper House Parliamentary inquiry she would not give in to "threats" over the rail line.

Ms McKay said the developer had gone into Newcastle and bought properties with its "eyes open" and its demands to rip up the line were unacceptable.

Answering questions at the inquiry into budget estimates for the Hunter, Ms McKay said she wanted to challenge GPT to back up its claims on the rail line with evidence of community support.

Opposition Hunter spokesman Mike Gallacher asked Ms McKay if she was prepared to risk the development over 2000 metres of rail track.

"I can assure you the Government will not give in to threats by developers," Ms McKay said.

She said a $650 million investment in Newcastle would be "most welcome" but it was disappointing it would now hinge on rail.

"The developer went into this with their eyes wide open or at least they should have," she said.

"At no time when they were buying up properties around Newcastle did they say the development would hinge on the removal of the rail line."

She said when the removal of rail was debated in 1996, it was believed it would lead to longer commuting times, more cars in the CBD and would affect residents across the Hunter.

"People liked the ease of catching a train right into the CBD," she said. "This is not the time for knee-jerk reactions but it's time to listen to the community and I challenge the developer to back up their claims with some rigorous research to see what residents want, and not just the business community."

Ms McKay said she hoped the Federal Government would become involved through its new Major Cities Unit.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
a lot has changed since 1996. It'd be interesting to see what genuine community consultation determines.
Posted by fista, 16/10/2008 11:20:04 PM
This is typical of large companies where they know the score. Then buy up big and try and force the changes to suit them. I say that Ms McKay should stick to her guns and if GPT are not happy then move on. One has to remember that if the line goes it will never come back. If you talk to people about the rail and trams that were around in the 30s that they wish they had never been replaced with nothing. There used to be a train to Toronto, now what would people give to have that back. Even with the upgrade of the bridges over the 5 islands the train would be packed if it had not been removed in the wake of progress. To people who want to get rid of the rail remember two things. 1 Just because you don't use it doesn't mean other people don't use it as well. 2. Once it's gone there is no turning back time.
Posted by Robert, 17/10/2008 8:41:28 AM
Jodi McKay please back up your claims that the people don't want an alternative to the rail line! Surely you read these comments? A light underground rail could be partially or fully funded by selling or leasing space above it for redevelopment. As an ex-miner digging a trench to accommodate an underground light rail similar to that which operates in Airports around the world is no brainer. Simple get off the train down an escalator or lift, board the light rail. Really ask the public not just of Newcastle CBD but the whole region who uses the CBD. We need leadership not the same politics that has led the CBD to where it is now. We thought you were a change for the better - please don't let us down.
Posted by Progressive Thinker, 17/10/2008 8:52:21 AM
Oh my God! Is our State govt. representative this stupid or is this just an inept and desperate strategy to stay in power (by suddenly being vocal against developers). I am not for either keeping or removing the railway (still reviewing all points of view) but it is pretty clear that the community is divided on this issue. It is also very naive or incompetent for a top ranking community representative to be quoting "1996" data (12 Years Old!!!) as a basis for how the community feels about any issue; the National Census is at least taken every 10 years. For a government that polls the Sydney population nearly every second week, spinning their policies in response, you would think that our Hunter representative could do a little better than quote 1996 statistics as a basis for how she is in touch with the Newcastle community. What’s worse is that McKay is arrogant enough to think that she can stand on this very shaky 1996 data to take the high ground on developers ( which is really not that hard to do) and proclaiming she knows the community better. What a complete joke! The fact that the Labor Party hasn’t done any current research themselves on community concerns in the Hunter after 17+yrs in power is a complete travesty. And what a complete joke from all those in the opposition parties to not properly take her to task on this.
Posted by Brett, 17/10/2008 8:58:10 AM
"People liked the ease of catching a train right into the CBD"..... Jodi McKay.. you're kidding yourself....who does? to go where? The bustling Newcastle Mall? The east end is dead. The half a dozen people who catch the train all the way to Newcastle station are doing nothing but further adding to the demise of the CBD.
Posted by Monty, 17/10/2008 9:16:18 AM
Let's be clear here. Ms McKay is not the Minister for the Hunter because she brings years of political experience or has an incredible intellect. She is a Minister to ensure she doesn't have to face pre-selection next time round. ALP rules exempt Ministers from that process. It is also inconceivable that a Minister would not understand that developers often purchase property with a view to future development and at the time of purchase the specific nature of that development may not have been fleshed out. GPT seem to have committed a substantial amount of money in the development of a "best use" proposal which excludes the rail link. I am sure they have a plan B as they wont just walk away - but plan B won't deliver anywhere near the benefits of plan A. News flash for the News reader - update your understanding of current community needs and examine how this proposal, absent rail, assists in resolving a range of issues about the CBD that you have been chest beating about since before the last election.
Posted by Adam Robertson, 17/10/2008 10:09:29 AM
even more intriguing for me, where are they catching the train from??
Posted by fista, 17/10/2008 10:28:08 AM
If some some genuine, current and independent research was undertaken accross Newcastle, central coast and the Hunter, then it would be clearer on the communities stance instead of all this generalisation. There is no point complaining about politician vs developer arguments and being held for ransom etc. We should be focused on the future growth of Newcastle and what the community wants. I used to regularly park outside the CBD and catch the free bus into the CBD. There were no delays greater than 5 minutes and it was door to door service. Whats wrong with stopping the rail line outside the CBD and having an extended free CBD bus servicing the whole Newcastle area including the beaches, Darby st, Merwether and Carrington.
Posted by Kyle, 17/10/2008 10:41:57 AM
McKay must not give in to blackmail. The rail line is a public asset and must not be destroyed. It would be a mistake that would be regeretted in the future.
Posted by Brad, 17/10/2008 10:55:09 AM
Despite what many people say and the low level of use of the rail line the fact is that we should be considering 20 50 100 years down the track. Tens of thounsands of more people living in and around the city will need a public transport system. Light rail represents the best of both worlds. An unobtrusive, clean, quiet system which unlike buses will not be subjected to congestion which will surely come with increased innercity activity. Jodie and the rest of the labor state mob should count themselves lucky we live in this great country. If we lived in Pakistan we would have had a coup by now. Pity they cant see beyond their elected term.
Posted by light_green, 17/10/2008 11:10:58 AM
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Has the State Government done enough to gauge public opinion on cutting the Newcastle inner-city rail line?

Yes
(24.2%)

No
(75.8%)

Total Votes: 211
Poll Date: 16 October, 2008

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...