News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Mine applications prompt fear for future of agriculture 

Mine applications prompt fear for future of agriculture

09 Aug, 2010 04:00 AM
A BATTLE is looming over the Hunter Valley's water resources and farming future, with coal companies seeking approval to mine riverlands previously regarded by many as off limits.

The Hunter Valley Water Users Association, the NSW Farmers Association and Hunter Minewatch are worried the government might approve potentially risky proposals without proper consideration.

At its state conference last month, the farmers association passed a resolution calling on the government to freeze consideration of any open-cut mining proposals on alluvial floodplains, and any longwall proposals within 150 metres of a creek.

The association wants the same limits to apply to coal seam gas extraction.

It wants the government to lift water security considerations out of Labor's controversial 3A planning laws, enabling the Office of Water to insist on better safeguards for rivers and underground water resources.

Some mines have already cut into riverine alluvium, the water-rich ground that forms an invisible, but integral part of streams and rivers, and are being forced to deal with water from the damaged streams entering their pits.

A spokesman for planning minister Tony Kelly said the farmers' association's views would be "carefully considered", but ruled out the requested freeze, saying the government was obliged to consider projects lodged under the environmental planning and assessment act.

"The Department of Planning will work closely with the Department of Industry and Investment and the NSW Office of Water in developing the coal-mining strategy," the spokesman said.

The department was "well aware of the relevance of water resource issues to the projects" and "has required that these issues be thoroughly addressed by the proponents".

Two companies with proposals to mine near rivers, Coal & Allied and Ashton Coal, have said they are confident their plans address any environmental risks.

Hunter Valley Water Users Association president Arthur Burns said his organisation wanted the government to put all mining proposals close to rivers and streams on hold until its promised "whole-of-government" review of the relationship between mining and other land uses was done.

"After the Bickham refusal we were promised a new deal by the government in which all land uses would be fairly considered," Mr Burns said.

"But after the government released its air quality study at Camberwell, the planning minister said it would now be possible for consideration of mining proposals around Camberwell to progress.

"That comment has made a lot of us very nervous because there are real fears about the potential risk to waterways from some mining plans," he said.

Association vice president Bruce Russell said he believed a handful of mining proposals for alluvial land were "the thin end of the wedge".

"Other coal companies are watching with interest, and if the government opens the door, we could be about to witness the beginning of the end of agriculture in the Hunter Valley," Mr Russell said. "This issue makes the fuss over Bickham a tiny matter by comparison."

Mr Russell's wife and former association secretary Carol Russell said the Hunter's rivers, streams and aquifers were suffering "death by a thousand cuts".

"On their own some of these mines might be OK, but all together the impact is devastating," she said.

Mrs Russell said water from Glennies Creek alluvium had been leaking into the Ashton mine near Camberwell.

Ashton had been obliged to buy water allocations to cover the losses caused by its mine, but this was subverting the real intent of the water-sharing scheme, she said.

"Under the water-sharing scheme, that lost water belonged to existing users or the environment.

"Now we understand some coal companies are talking about buying allocations to cover damage they expect to do in the future. That is turning the whole intent of the scheme on its head. You shouldn't be allowed to buy a licence to cause a problem," she said.

"The legislation was enacted to minimise waste of water and harm to river systems, not to underwrite bad mining practice."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
No comparison between mining royalties and Agricultural dividends. Approx. 1 cow per acre compared to Approx $100 per cubic metre but we do need electricity and we do need meat, milk and water.
Posted by jimbob, 9/08/2010 9:02:13 AM, on The Herald
STOP PRESS. Great news for King Coal, the proposed Ferndale Mine exploration drilling has identified an extra 50-80million tns of Open Cut Coal. This brings the total resource up to around 330million tns. It means that the small underground mine first flagged will now be very large and include an open cut making it more than twice the size of Mangoola (Anvil Hill) 7k Nth which has a resource of only 150mil tns but still covers 3763 Ha of land. How big, demanding, noisy, dusty and thirsty will Denman's new industrial OVERLORD become? It's nestled in a beutiful fertile valley surrounded by the Wollomi Wilderness area, sitting just 4.5klm West, upwind & upriver of the town. Truck access to this location is now also through the quiet streets of Denman. Like Mangoola how many families will be evicted, how many farms with water licences "aquired" to spray on dust. King Coal & the State Gov. have no intention of investigating the cumulative Impacts of mining and review the planning process on where mines shouldn't be allowed to exist before issuing more Exploration Licences and continuing the destruction of communities & farming land in the Upper Hunter. RIP Yarrawa & Denman.
Posted by SPARKS, 9/08/2010 10:14:01 AM, on The Herald
STOP PRESS. Great news for King Coal, the proposed Ferndale Mine exploration drilling has identified an extra 50-80million tns of Open Cut Coal. This brings the total resource up to around 330million tns. It means that the small underground mine first flagged will now be very large and include an open cut making it more than twice the size of Mangoola (Anvil Hill) 7k Nth which has a resource of only 150mil tns but still covers 3763 Ha of land. How big, demanding, noisy, dusty and thirsty will Denman's new industrial OVERLORD become? It's nestled in a beutiful fertile valley surrounded by the Wollomi Wilderness area, sitting just 4.5klm West, upwind & upriver of the town. Truck access to this location is now also through the quiet streets of Denman. Like Mangoola how many families will be evicted, how many farms with water licences "aquired" to spray on dust. King Coal & the State Gov. have no intention of investigating the cumulative Impacts of mining and review the planning process on where mines shouldn't be allowed to exist before issuing more Exploration Licences and continuing the destruction of communities & farming land in the Upper Hunter. RIP Yarrawa & Denman.
Posted by SPARKS, 9/08/2010 10:14:03 AM, on The Herald
[quote]A spokesman for planning minister Tony Kelly said the farmers' association's views would be "carefully considered", but ruled out the requested freeze, saying the government was obliged to consider projects lodged under the environmental planning and assessment act.[quote] Mr Kelly has only one option when considering these requests from coal companies. That option is a resounding NO!
Posted by Wally, 9/08/2010 10:20:48 AM, on The Herald
Money cannot be eaten!
Posted by the Big Haul, 9/08/2010 10:49:27 AM, on The Herald
Open cut mining must be banned.All coal mines should only be accesed through uderground tunneling methods,it has a higher risk factor on employees which still can be managed but has far far less enviromental impact.Its a no brainer really ,miners below ,cows ,vines and equines above .
Posted by horse, 9/08/2010 11:18:54 AM, on The Herald
Clarification. The NSW Gov. Instigates the process, they mark out areas on the maps & issue the Exploration Licences. They are the ones that invite expressions of interest from mining Companies. The NSW Gov also approves these Mines. The mining Companies are only the happy exploiters of the opportunities given to them by our State Government. The environmental guidelines are also set by the NSW Gov. and the policing of the guidelines is also done by the NSW Gov. Guess who makes Billions in Royalties from these mines. it will only stop when the NSW STATE GOVERNMENT are persuaded or forced to do what they said they were going to do. But at the moment as there is not enough political pressure they have no intention of investigating the cumulative Impacts of mining and review their planning & approval process on where mining shouldn't be allowed before rushing to issue more Exploration Licences or halting the destruction of communities & farming land in the Hunter, Midwest (Mudgee) or the Liverpool (Quirindi- Gunnedah) areas. If our City Centric State Gov. don't much care about Newcastle City what level of concern do you think small farming communities get?? We need help NOW.
Posted by SPARKS, 9/08/2010 11:47:35 AM, on The Herald
1 head of cattle needs 4 acres - it also needs water and fresh air. We will run out of coal and have nothing left to export OR eat. We are selling off all OUR assets at an alarming rate. Why don't we slow down the export and keep our agriculture. Can someone show me some rehabilitated ex coal land ??? We have been mining coal for such a long time - there should already be some, that has been rehabilitated back to it's natural state. Why are we making all the other countries rich - and destroying ourselves ??? Can somebody tell me ???
Posted by Rose- Lake Macquarie, 9/08/2010 12:14:46 PM, on The Herald
Wally. People should know that the reason that Planning Minister Tony Kelly says that the Government is obliged to consider projects lodged under the act. The Mining Companies pay extreme Multi-million dollar sums up front for the right to just "EXPLORE". it would be highly unlikely that the NSW Gov. that has pocketed these "FEES" will knock back a mine's approval. The question should be is it appropriate for the Exploration Licence Issuer, the Mine approver and the royalty receiver be the same entity. Remember the NSW Gov. was the one that drew up the location and boundaries of the exploration Lease areas in the first place. They asked for miners to apply then received a downpayment form that Miner. It would be highly unlikely that the NSW Gov. would turn around and find that the location that they themselves chose is inappropriate especially when they have already received $Millions from the miner and will receive many more $Millions in royalties. It's a no brainer that the Hunter Valley is a moonscape and they haven't finished drawing mine boundaries on the maps yet or finish offering for cash our landscape, water and health to the highest bidder. Save us from this Gov.
Posted by SPARKS, 9/08/2010 1:15:39 PM, on The Herald
Amazingly" this interrelated pack of fortune tellers, show total disregard to the precautionary principle & even common sense. Our waterways have been replaced by a toxic stream of PART 3A applicants or "proponents" blatantly & consistently exhibiting absolute confidence in their unseen plans to address "any" future environmental risk.
Posted by Playing with Fire, 9/08/2010 1:34:52 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
GRAVE CONCERN: Hunter Valley Water Users Association vice president Bruce Russell on his farm at Mount Thorley near Singleton. - Picture by Peter Stoop
GRAVE CONCERN: Hunter Valley Water Users Association vice president Bruce Russell on his farm at Mount Thorley near Singleton. - Picture by Peter Stoop
GROWING: The open-cut mine at Camberwell and the village of Camberwell behind it.
GROWING: The open-cut mine at Camberwell and the village of Camberwell behind it.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
09 August, 2010

Most popular articles


 
Landcom Sanctuary 190512
 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...