News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Mining blasts give Upper Hunter the shakes 

Mining blasts give Upper Hunter the shakes

20 Jan, 2011 03:00 AM
Upper Hunter residents are experiencing mining blasts as powerful as small earthquakes several times a week, independent seismological data shows.

Coonabarabran-based seismologist Michael Phillips has been operating seismological equipment in Muswellbrook since November.

What began as a simple test project at the request of residents has become a 24-hour project to monitor ground movement.

"There's an increasing demand for this type of work in affected communities," Dr Phillips said.

"There's a lot of people in the Hunter really steamed up about what is happening."

The equipment, on a private property, is capable of detecting movement ranging from traffic to earth tremors.

Blasts between 1.8 and 2 on the Richter scale are usually recorded at least twice a week.

"So far I have yet to see an instance of an exceedence where a mine oversteps the legal limit for off-site ground motion," he said.

"But the blasts which I have recorded are certainly large enough to irritate many locals."

Dr Phillips said there was evidence to show mining activity was capable of triggering earthquakes.

"Mines do go through faults in the earth which releases stress," he said.

"When that happens you may get an earthquake."

Under existing open-cut mine planning approvals, individual mines are responsible for monitoring the impact of their blasting activities.

The Department of Planning investigated a blast at Xstrata's Glendell mine on December 23 after complaints that it smashed crockery and knocked a clock from a wall in Camberwell Village.

Although the blast exceeded approved limits, no action was taken because 5 per cent of the mine's blasts are allowed to exceed approved limits within a 12 month period.

Mines must also prepare blast management plans in consultation with the Department of Environment, Climate and Water.

Conditions include keeping noise and vibrations from blasting within specified limits and limiting the frequency and time of day blasting occurs.

The Department of Planning has also opened an office in Singleton dedicated solely to policing the compliance of mines with their approval conditions.

"A number of fines and other restorative actions have already resulted from this office's work," a department spokesman said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Without supporting mining companies, I believe blast vibration levels of 1.8 to 2 on the Richter scale are virtually undetectable to humans. It is not just vibration that is the problem. Overpressure, noise and dust are also serious issues to neighbouring residents.

Blame government approvals that allow a percentage of blasts to exceed determined limits. If very large, and they need to be very large, fines were mandatory for any blast over the limit you would be surprised how quickly the issue would come under control.

Most companies take the issue very seriously but the almighty dollar still rules - whether the problem is blasting vibration, noise, dust or undermining creeks or damaging ground water resources.

It has taken 30 years to have cumulative mining effects belatedly acknowledged by the NSW government, so how long do you think it will take to get a serious control regime in place?

Posted by Insider, 20/01/2011 6:39:55 AM, on The Herald
Individual mines are responsible for monitoring the impact. I believe that's lame.
Posted by Rose- Lake Macquarie, 20/01/2011 6:53:01 AM, on The Herald
There needs to be an immediate moratorium on any further mining approvals in the Hunter. We have already gone too far with it. Stop now.
Posted by judgedredd, 20/01/2011 7:14:50 AM, on The Herald
Mining foxes in charge of the Hunter's hen houses.
Posted by TRANSPARENCY!, 20/01/2011 7:53:46 AM, on The Herald
Five per cent of the mine's blasts are allowed to exceed approved limits within a 12 month period. What a joke.

Imagine if the RTA applied this law to motorists?

Seems to me they are a law unto themselves.

In reality, except for the employment, where is the benefit for the valley in all the billions of dollars that have travelled by rail to the port?

So over it


Posted by so over it, 20/01/2011 8:13:05 AM, on The Herald
If 5 per cent per year are allowed to exceed limits and they make a thousand blasts a year that means 50 a year can exceed limits. Any wonder the locals are angry. What's the point of a approved limit if it's permissible to exceed it whenever the mining company deems neccesary? If they want to exceed it they just have more blasts to maintan the 5 per cent.
Posted by just a thought, 20/01/2011 9:07:21 AM, on The Herald
Ah that's OK with Macquarie Street. They are not affected but they love the royalties it brings in to spend in Sydney. When are we going to rebel and demand enough is enough? These miners are nothing more than environmental vandals.
Posted by Steve, 20/01/2011 11:57:42 AM, on The Herald
The mining companies own the Valley so they feel they can do as they please...after all they have been doin it for so long now anyway....what's that they DON'T own the valley???
Posted by What a liberty, 20/01/2011 3:09:11 PM, on The Herald
The mining industry seems to be writing government and coalition policies, so weak regulations are not suprising. Why do we continue to put up with this ?
Posted by Mad as hell, 20/01/2011 4:16:17 PM, on The Herald
Seriously people, get over it. Without mining this country would be destitute. Try living in a place where they blast 3 times a day right beneath you, including at midnight. I'd rather mine blasts than living next to our busy rail line!
Posted by getoverit, 20/01/2011 7:48:29 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Who should monitor mining blasts in the Hunter?

The mining companies
(7.1%)

An independent authority
(92.9%)

Total Votes: 281
Poll Date: 19 January, 2011

Most popular articles


 
Landcom Sanctuary 190512
 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...