News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Mining pits homes against coal 

Mining pits homes against coal

05 Feb, 2011 03:00 AM
A coalmining company is on a collision course with a residential developer over a site on the southern shore of Lake Macquarie.

In an ironic twist, the developer is a coalmining company.

LDO Coal, which owns Chain Valley Colliery, has opposed fellow mining company Coal & Allied's plan to build 623 dwellings on a 62-hectare site on Crangan Bay at Gwandalan.

In a submission to the Department of Planning, LDO Coal said it was planning to mine for coal in the area for the next 21 years.

LDO Coal said it aimed to mine directly under the Coal & Allied site, which could cause subsidence.

"The coal needs to be extracted before the residential development, otherwise there will be a loss of coal reserves," LDO's submission said.

"It would be impractical, costly and untenable to develop the residential precinct and mine the area."

But Coal & Allied said in a planning report that significant residential land in Lake Macquarie and Newcastle was "contained within mine leases".

"It is common practice for mining to occur, and future mining to be proposed, beneath established residential communities," the report said.

Coal could be mined beneath its site using "partial extraction mining methods without significantly impacting the residential development", Coal & Allied said.

LDO said it wanted to fully extract all the coal and any sterilisation of coal would reduce the life of the mine and cause "considerable impacts" on jobs and the state economy.

Coal & Allied's report said full extraction of coal under its site would have an "unacceptable impact on the area, regardless of whether residential development were to occur".

Coal & Allied said its housing development would provide $16.8 million in benefits to the state, but the cost of sterilised coal in the area would be only $7.3 million.

Coal & Allied will dedicate 206 hectares of land to the NSW government for conservation as part of an arrangement to enable the development.

LDO Coal said it was opposed to the conservation land deal if it led to "additional controls being applied to planned mining activities".

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This is an interesting one ! With the dreadful subsidence which occured previously in the general area of housing - it would seem very foolish to develop any more homes, whilever the mining is allowed to extract to its permitted capacity.

The 2 are not compatible. The people who suffered before will tell you all that. The trauma and losses were unforgiveable and lessons should be learned from such mistakes.

Who would want to spend hundreds of thousands of hard earned dollars - and not be able to sleep well?

Posted by Rose- Lake Macquarie, 5/02/2011 5:25:51 AM, on The Herald
Tough tiddies to LDO. Welcome to the real world.
Posted by Big Al, 5/02/2011 8:11:04 AM, on The Herald
What a farce. Not only is it amazing that both companies speak as if all is a given (not hard with the behaviour of department officials and ministers) but no mention of any other critical criteria.

This is an industry that cares little for environmental aftermaths and has total disregard for community. It is all about lining the pockets not about 'jobs'. If it were not so ridiculously Orwellian it would be funny. Sadly, no insight = poor decisions

Posted by beyond belief, 5/02/2011 6:53:14 PM, on The Herald
I wonder what Coal and Allied would do if they still held the Mining Leases for this land. Two seams have already been mined by them. No doubt they would mine again. This is their core business, not development.

And when you consider the number of homes for sale in Gwandalan why would you add another 600 plus blocks to the area.

Posted by Rosie - Gwandalan, 7/02/2011 9:33:17 AM, on The Herald
And your time will come to LDO , the local

community looks forward to you submitting

your EA for your planned expansion.

Posted by local resident, 7/02/2011 1:52:52 PM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
NO GAIN: Gwandalan resident Peter Bates said the proposed Crangan Bay development did not make sense. - Picture by Simone de Peak
NO GAIN: Gwandalan resident Peter Bates said the proposed Crangan Bay development did not make sense. - Picture by Simone de Peak

Most popular articles


 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...