News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Minister eager to water down costs 

Minister eager to water down costs

01 Jul, 2009 11:18 AM
NSW Minister for Water Phillip Costa is at odds with state-owned utility Hunter Water over planned water and sewerage price rises.

Mr Costa has written to the pricing regulator arguing for Hunter Water price rises to be limited to less than what the utility was seeking.

The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal will make a final decision this month on a controversial plan to increase Hunter Water charges for a typical household by $220 or 31 per cent from 2008-09 to 2012-13.

Under the plan, prices will rise by $69 or 9 per cent in 2009-10.

The utility had asked for prices to rise by 57 per cent by 2012-13, but the tribunal rejected that and proposed a 31 per cent rise.

"A 31 per cent increase comes at a difficult time for many Hunter Region residents who are feeling the impacts of the global economic crisis," Mr Costa said in a submission to the tribunal.

"The Hunter regional economy is particularly vulnerable to the current economic downturn due to its reliance on commodity exports."

Mr Costa said the NSW Government urged the tribunal to ensure that price increases were "limited to those absolutely necessary to ensure the ongoing supply of safe, healthy and reliable water and sewerage services".

Mr Costa's comments were made despite the NSW Government ordering Hunter Water to build Tillegra Dam and meet new environmental standards.

The utility needed to increase prices to "improve water and drought security for the Hunter region through the construction of Tillegra Dam, as directed by the minister", the tribunal said.

Price rises were needed to pay for sewerage system upgrades worth $100 million to meet Department of Environment and Climate Change standards and to maintain the utility's financial sustainability.

Sydney Water supported its Hunter counterpart, saying the tribunal should not set prices below Hunter Water's costs, which had been "efficiently determined".

It said the tribunal's recommendation of a 31 per cent rise by 2012-13 would set prices $18 million below costs.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Mr Costa should be demanding that IPART is truely INDEPENDANT and not just a yes minister. I note that IPART has refused a second public hearing dispite numerous requests and major changes since the first hearing.
Posted by Bigfeller, 1/07/2009 11:49:09 AM
Who on earth is Philip Costa? I thought we were rid of the Costa problem when Michael Costa left. Are they related?
Posted by Jim, 1/07/2009 12:06:24 PM
Come off the grass!! If the Minister wants to really take on the shareholder (Treasurer) he would publicise the dividend and tax equivalent disparity between Sydney and Newcastle since 1995. This is where the money all went, and why there is a need to suck more from the Hunter voters. If the Greens were fair dinkum, they would do the minimal homework needed to expose this scam perpetrated on the people of the Hunter. Lee Rhiannon should ask the NSW Parliamentary Library to present the history of DIVIDENDEND AND TAX EQUIVALENTS Sydney VS Newcastle for last 15 years and expose the truth. It will shock and amaze!!!
Posted by Reformer, 1/07/2009 4:20:45 PM
this is a good challenge Reformer! in my experience nobody really cares until it hits them in the face! look at the travesty of electricity bills. Herald, compare the price of electricity to the smelters ... 3.6 cents per kilowatt hour, even at peak hour, compared wit more than 22 cents for domestic users. Plus the smelters get to tax deduct 30% of the cost!!!! It would make a great article.
Posted by beverly, 1/07/2009 5:05:02 PM
So has Costa at any stage mentioned to the IPART tribunal that Hunter Water has had its income sucked out of it to fund Sydney projects and NSW coffers for the last 15-20 years - instead of the money being spent on HW's present proposals? Or did he conveniently keep that aside so it could not be taken into account?
Posted by Bondy, 1/07/2009 8:32:01 PM
Hey Beverlyy whats the smelter pay for water?
Posted by Bigfeller, 1/07/2009 9:34:33 PM
Totally agree Beverley. How about we stop sending dividends to Sydney, abandon the building of Tillegra for the Central Coast and then reassess how much we need to pay.
Posted by Chookman, 2/07/2009 8:50:55 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Hamilton St Patricks Day
 
Scholarships
 
 
EAO_The Loop
 
Travelworld_See the World
 
Kloster No 1. Car Sale
 
School Newspaper Competition
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...