News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Move to solve Newcastle coal ship queues 

Move to solve Newcastle coal ship queues

15 Sep, 2009 04:00 AM
NEWCASTLE coal ships will be forced to wait in international waters until 48 hours before their loading date under the State Government's controversial "virtual queue" plan.

Ships that anchor in Australian waters while waiting to load at Newcastle can be demoted in the queue while those that refuse to follow "lawful directions" may be prosecuted.

The Government wants the system operating by December 30 and draft rules have been circulated for comment by Newcastle Port Corporation.

The Opposition derided the plan when it was unveiled last December as an "out of sight, out of mind" approach and coal shippers said yesterday that nothing had changed.

"There will still be a queue and ships will still pay demurrage, they just won't be visible from Newcastle," one coal shipper, speaking anonymously, said yesterday.

A presentation to international customers said the vessel arrival system would not change the port's coal-export capacity but it would make the Newcastle anchorage safer while reducing the environmental impact of waiting ships.

Ships wanting to come to Newcastle would apply at least 14 days ahead and be given 10 days' notice of their estimated loading time. The ships must then "use all reasonable endeavours to present at the anchorage not more than 48 hours prior to their loading time".

"Vessels entering or using the anchorage more than 48 hours prior to their loading time may be demoted in the queue or may lose their priority or face prosecution as determined by Newcastle Port Corporation."

Any ship "anchored in the territorial sea of Australia during its transit" to Newcastle could be penalised.

Vessels that repeatedly refuse to follow the port corporation's "lawful directions" could be permanently refused entry to Newcastle.

The queue peaked in June 2007, when 83 ships waited an average of 28 days to load.

A port corporation spokesman declined to comment yesterday on the vessel arrival system.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
One has wonder about the rail haulage system, if it has enough capacity to have the coal waiting in the coal loader area. All the rest is a smoke screen for the failings again of the government.
Posted by Martin C, 15/09/2009 7:24:09 AM, on The Herald
Thats the best news I have heard yet. The damage these ships have done and continue to do to the sea floor along our coast line Dragging their huge anchors is irriversible. There are a few historical wrecks off Newcastle which are now torn to small pieces.
Posted by Haz., 15/09/2009 7:35:50 AM, on The Herald
if something is in so much demand a free market says that they could bid for a certain amount of the coal available. A small proportion of the total should be "up for grabs". The extra charged for this should be available for the sustaining of the port by work that is needed on stockton beach. its "user pays" by ability and willingness to "jump the queue". Sustaining the port by keeping Stockton intact is the beneficiary.
Posted by coalbusiness, 15/09/2009 9:12:09 AM, on The Herald
This is disastrous to Newcastle. The ships are one of the worlds largest ports major tourist attractions. Jodi you are Tourism Minister stop this rot!
Posted by Bigfeller, 15/09/2009 9:40:20 AM, on The Herald
Is this Australian customer service at its finest? I for one do not believe that threats and intimidation are the foundations to strong long term relationships. Nor is making clients wait for weeks at great expense to get their products. How hard can it be, in spite of all the competing interests, to get this matter sorted out. Continued failure to do so will inevitably lead to other sources of coal or energy to become a preferred source to Newcastle, no matter what the terms, price or quality. We are talking about a commodity after all. Also, I am not sure that keeping the vessels in international waters, and outside any legal jurisdiction is an improvement in security for either the vessels or Newcastle and Australia. Its high time this matter be resolved in favour of the customers. After all, it is their business we need to insure our continued regional economic prosperity.
Posted by NTS, 15/09/2009 9:42:51 AM, on The Herald
Makes sense...what you can't see can't hurt you , Eih??
Posted by ClimateCrisis, 15/09/2009 10:59:34 AM, on The Herald
sad sad state of affairs!
Posted by nemo, 15/09/2009 1:42:13 PM, on The Herald
I think this is a great idea, these things do nothing but destroy habitat and historical wrecks off Newcastle. No one is asking that we loose the business, just wait further off shore where the damage will be minimalised. Bring it on. Newcastle continually struggles to shake the "Industry Town" image, this can only help...
Posted by Chong2868, 15/09/2009 2:27:33 PM, on The Herald
international waters! wont (i'm asking because i dont know) that mean their anchor chains will need to be like endless, or the engines used all the time to hold them in place?
Posted by just a thought, 15/09/2009 3:02:03 PM, on The Herald
Hi Justa a thought. What it means is the ships wont arrive weeks or months ahead of their scheduled loading date and so wont be draging their anchors all over the sea bed destroying our fisheries, historical wrecks off our coast and demanding demurrage. Common sense must win out in the end. If they have to carry a three mile long anchor chain to anchor in international waters they might considder staying home untill they are due in port for their load and not holiday off Newcastle dumping their rubbish overboard as I have seen many times.
Posted by Haz., 15/09/2009 3:41:29 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB44 plans 12%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 6%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 2%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 2%
5) Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press

Travelworld_See the World
 
School Newspaper Competition


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...