News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 MP's push for Queens Wharf cruise ship terminal 

MP's push for Queens Wharf cruise ship terminal

16 Aug, 2010 05:00 AM
QUEENS Wharf is down but not out in the race to find a suitable home for a cruise ship terminal in Newcastle.

Hunter Minister and Newcastle MP Jodi McKay is asking property owner Newcastle City Council to reconsider its stance on ruling out the wharf as a potential home berth.

Councillors knocked the idea on the head last month when asked to contribute $20,000 towards a $40,000 cruise ship terminal feasibility study.

The state government was to pay the other half.

Queens Wharf and two state sites, the channel berth at Dyke Point and the old pilot station, were to be assessed.

The council decided on July 6 not to finance the study because other levels of government and the cruise industry would be responsible for developing a terminal.

But the local authority noted a preference for Dyke Point.

Ms McKay has since written to general manager Lindy Hyam asking the council to include Queens Wharf in the study.

That proposal will be put to councillors tomorrow.

A council report recommends including Queens Wharf, with a proviso that City Hall could not guarantee putting money towards redevelopment if the site was earmarked as a terminal.

Lord mayor John Tate said the council had made a decision, and it was the correct one.

"And now we see a dubious proposition being pushed by the minister, Jodi McKay," he said.

A spokesman for Ms McKay said council staff had been working co-operatively with the government on possible locations for a permanent cruise ship terminal.

"It is disappointing that the lord mayor has not shown the same level of co-operation," he said.

"The minister remains committed to delivering a permanent cruise ship terminal in Newcastle.

"To ensure the most suitable site is selected, all possible locations, which includes Queens Wharf, should be included as part of a comprehensive feasibility study."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
No better place to put it than the wharf directly opposite the floating dock near the cruising yacht club. A ship the size of a 10 storey building parked at Queens Wharf would detract from the beauty of the harbour. The other location has been used before, is still central to all the amenities Newcastle has to offer and there is no disruption to traffic as there is great space there for parking and disembarking. Use the space wisely, fix up Queens Wharf as a tourist area not a car park for ships.
Posted by Dave, 16/08/2010 7:38:46 AM, on The Herald
If we want the cruise industry to make Newcastle a permanent home we must have a berth that has direct access to the city.
Posted by aktim, 16/08/2010 8:29:30 AM, on The Herald
Whilst Jodi McKay has written to the General Manager - it is up to the elected council to make a decision. As they have already spoken they should consider the action of McKay as a gross insult. If the state government wants a facility build it should bear the total cost of any feasability study and also the total cost of any construction costs plus ongoing maintenance. This is just another case of a "parachuted in" polly paying their dues to their master in Sussex Street rather than fighting in the best interests of the people they are supposed to represent.
Posted by Bazza, 16/08/2010 9:37:57 AM, on The Herald
Jodi you are on the wrong wharf! Cruise ship passengers spend very little money in ports. Generally less than $100. I can only think it is the developers contributions to the ALP that is keeping this alive. Only labour donations could justify a cruise terminal that next year will only see three ships and no ship in the second half of the year.
Posted by Bigfeller, 16/08/2010 9:44:10 AM, on The Herald
There are more seats on the train to Newcastle Station each and every week than there has been passengers on all the cruise ships to come to Newcastle in the last 20 years!
Posted by Spinner, 16/08/2010 9:46:36 AM, on The Herald
This is a ridiculous proposal. Has anyone seen the size of a cruise ship at dock? That would ruin the whole site. Imagine sitting there on a lazy Sunday and all you have in front of you is effectively a 12 storey building. Add to that there would need to be a customs processing area for any ships that have come in from offshore and suddenly the whole area starts to resemble a detention centre rather than the fantastic vista it currently is.
Posted by IndyJonesJnr, 16/08/2010 9:56:55 AM, on The Herald
This ridiculous terminal idea is ill-considered and takes no account of the paltry sums spent by the ship-leavers. They can't take wine or alcohol back on board and the chance of them finding anything decent to buy in this city is almost ZILCH!! Jodi and Aaron should check out a few terminal-cams to see what desolate places they are most days.
Posted by John P X Ibrahim, 16/08/2010 9:57:22 AM, on The Herald
Cruise ships may look lovely in brochures. But up close, berthed at Queens Wharf, they will be an eyesore that will block out the northerly sun and cast a shadow, as well as obliterating views of the harbour and access to the foreshore. Add service vehicles, tour mini-buses, security vehicles, customs, quarantine etc etc. Add a very large concret slab, and probably an arrivals/departure hall and the area will look as bad as the rail line does. All that for 6-8 cruise ships a year. Cruise ship terminals are not attractive pieces of infrastructure. Forget the cruise ship romance; the reality is, it's a "SHIPPING TERMINAL" !!!!!! Should the decision be made to shorten the rail line, then I would hope the area would be a large foreshore harbourside park for all to enjoy. Something that was denied to us when Moneysuckle was built. I'm all for a cruise ship terminal but not at Queens Wharf.
Posted by No shipping terminal at queens wharf, 16/08/2010 10:05:40 AM, on The Herald
I agree with all those comments regarding cruise ships towering over Queens Wharf. Whenever friends from Sydney or interstate visit they always comment on what a wonderful asset the wharf is and how nice it would be if they were able to enjoy the outdoors over the water back home. The best place is Lee Wharf near Wickham where there is ample room for buses and delivery vehicles. If you want it so bad Jodi then you pay for the study but it is clear to me the council have taken on board feedback from the public and we have made it clear we do not want cruise ships at Queens Wharf. By the way Jodi, where will the ferry go to if it cannot access the wharf?
Posted by Nudge, 16/08/2010 12:22:36 PM, on The Herald
NCC's general manager needs to understand who she reports to and it's NOT the State govt.
Posted by ratsintheranks, 16/08/2010 1:05:50 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Where should a Hunter cruise ship terminal be built?

Queens Wharf
(38.4%)

Dyke Point
(25.7%)

Old pilot station, Newcastle
(23.1%)

Somewhere in Lake Macquarie or Port Stephens
(12.7%)

Total Votes: 268
Poll Date: 15 August, 2010

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
CPA Newcastle Convention 2012
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...