News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Network to monitor dust from new Upper Hunter power station 

Network to monitor dust from new Upper Hunter power station

05 Mar, 2010 03:00 AM
NSW Health Minister Carmel Tebbutt has defended the State Government's decision to allow a new baseload power station in the Upper Hunter, saying it would not necessarily have a negative impact on residents' health.

Bayswater B, a new 2000 megawatt station near Muswellbrook, was given the green light by the Government on Wednesday, although it was not decided whether it would be fired by gas or coal.

Ms Tebbutt said the Department of Environment and Climate Change would establish a dust monitoring network in the Upper Hunter, to look at whether the community was negatively affected by dust.

"Data is inconclusive as to whether the Upper Hunter has higher rates of respiratory illness than other areas of NSW," she said.

"It's not conclusive."

But Upper Hunter resident Bev Smiles said the station would more likely be run on coal and would contribute to air pollution.

"It will mean on-going devastation of the Hunter Valley and the coalfields to the west in the Gunnedah basin," she said.

"Until we have the air monitoring stations set up we won't have that baseline data but what we do know is that this is doubling the size of the power station.

"If it's coal, then there's known toxic emissions from coal-fired power stations and if it's gas then there's emissions from burning fossil fuels."

Greenpeace activists have protested against the Government's decision, saying it gave a green light to coal power at the expense of renewable energy sources.

But Ms Tebbutt said that would not necessarily be the case.

"We've always said that we're fuel source-neutral, so these may well be gas or coal-fired power stations," she said.

Greens MLC John Kaye said the NSW Government was locking in a future of coal stations and "yet more respiratory disease in the Upper Hunter."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Of course we need more coal fired power stations, and the ratbags who want a more expensive alternative can put up the millions themselves. The only good news for The Greens is that the inner Sydney seat held by Carmel Tebbutt is the only one they have a chance of winning, and it would be good to see another dreadful Labor Minister lose her seat. But Sydney voters don't care about Hunter residents especially the selfish left-wingers who might vote Green.
Posted by Wes, 5/03/2010 4:18:09 AM, on The Herald
If Health Minister Tebbutt is fair dinkum about setting up this much talked about dust monitoring network in the Upper Hunter, she should be insisting on monitors that measure particulate matter at 1 to 2.5. If the Minister allows the monitors to measure particulate matter to 10, the fine particles that can be dangerous to our health will not be detected. Come on Minister do it now.
Posted by lifestyle, 5/03/2010 6:15:21 AM, on The Herald
& the good people of the Hunter go Mooooooooooo, cough MOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Posted by Coughing Cash Cow, 5/03/2010 6:32:06 AM, on The Herald
amazing that a concept can be approved and the proponent is still unknown. assesments havnt even been done. and typical state gov, dust emissions monitoring to be done. this is not a new thing.
Posted by king coal royal tease, 5/03/2010 7:43:54 AM, on The Herald
From an earlier Herald report: "In the Hunter and New England, asthma is the most common cause behind hospital admission for children under the age of six, while about one in six youngsters across the region are predicted to develop an asthma-related illness." Is this normal? and "THE Hunter and New England region has the highest asthma death rate for women in NSW, the state's second highest number of female asthma cases, and the toll looks set to continue." What figures are you looking at Carmel? Would you like to risk your young children immediately downwind of a coal power station or open cut mine with 20 year old air quality standards? Should these folks just take one for the team?
Posted by takeOneForTheTeam, 5/03/2010 8:46:38 AM, on The Herald
We need another coal fired base load power station like the ozone layer needs another (black) hole. Renewables are do-able. Our Coal dependant government doesn't want to make it happen because it won't make enough money out of it. What is the co$t for human health or indeed, the continuance of a healthy planet? The air grows thick as time runs out... get your air purification mask ready, Wes.
Posted by Climate Crisis, 5/03/2010 5:08:25 PM, on The Herald
I wonder who will be the monitors of the dust? Surely it will be an independant buisness~NOT!
Posted by HotAirHappeningHere, 5/03/2010 5:10:37 PM, on The Herald
@ lifestyle: here here!
Posted by Vera Ventolin, 5/03/2010 8:53:41 PM, on The Herald
Perhaps whilst there at it...someone should speak to the medical satff at John Hunter who have stated that 3 towns in the Hunter have the highest incidence of Type 1 Diabetes. Muswellbrook, Singleton & Maitland. I personally would like to know why.
Posted by DIM, 25/03/2010 8:28:19 PM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: The NSW Government will allow a new power station in the Upper Hunter. Should it run on gas or coal?

Gas
(42.1%)

Coal
(25.9%)

We should not have another power station
(32%)

Total Votes: 197
Poll Date: 04 March, 2010

Most popular articles


EAO_The Loop
 
 
School Newspaper Competition


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...