News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 New Hunter terminal idea floated 

New Hunter terminal idea floated

06 Feb, 2010 04:00 AM
AS Newcastle prepares to launch its own cruise ship, the call is growing for a terminal in the heart of the city.

Newcastle councillor Aaron Buman wants City Hall to ask the State Government for money to do a feasibility study on building a cruise ship terminal at or near Queens Wharf.

Newcastle City Council is expected to consider the matter on February 16.

"At the end of the day, council own the land and it's quite within our realm to build a cruise terminal if it stacks up financially," Cr Buman said.

"It would be a very important piece of infrastructure for the city."

Cr Buman said the project would depend on removal of the inner-city rail line.

Increasing numbers of national and international cruise ships have visited the city in recent years.

From September, P&O Cruises will become the first cruise company to base a ship in the city when the Pacific Sun operates out of the Port of Newcastle.

Having passengers and about 700 crew embark and disembark in the city for at least 14 voyages is expected to result in a $6 million economic benefit.

P&O Cruises operator Carnival Australia's corporate affairs director, Sandy Olsen, said the reception from travellers had been good.

"We think that cruising from Newcastle will capture the imagination of the people of the Hunter," she said. "Because it's good value and it's relaxing holidays."

Ms Olsen said bookings were in line with with expectations.

Pacific Sun will dock at the Channel Berth, Carrington.

A terminal at Queens Wharf might be a future consideration.

"I'm sure as the industry grows, discussion around better and more prominent facilities will also grow in the community," she said.

"We would support this, but we understand this is a first step. And we have to prove ourselves."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Newcastle is terminal, and on a dead-end peninsula, so why not?
Posted by Billy, 6/02/2010 4:43:20 AM, on The Herald
What does inner city rail have to do with the future of a cruise ship terminal? At this point most passengers are transported to Port Stephens and Pokolbin. There are plenty of sights to visit in Newcastle but the CBD still needs to be fixed to allow tourist to shop and spend in our fair city otherwise the money will just go to close neighbors.
Posted by aktim, 6/02/2010 7:42:00 AM, on The Herald
The Overseas cruise ship terminal in sydney is next to the train station Here we go again another lot of propoganda to remove the rail line,if the rail line is removed overseas passengers will be the only people you will see in newcastle
Posted by bushy, 6/02/2010 7:52:23 AM, on The Herald
A Cruise Terminal at Queen's Wharf would be sensational. Visitors would arrive in the heart of Newcastle, lots of amenities within easy walking distance. These ships would be a great visual sight to Novocastrians being so close to the city and could do no harm encouraging us to take a cruise. Newcastle and Stockton would look so good arriving at dawn and sailing out at sunset an a cruise liner. Let us support this move. Afterall the Cruise Terminal in Sydney is at Circular Quay, right in the heart of Sydney.
Posted by Proud Novocastrian, 6/02/2010 11:16:48 AM, on The Herald
Here we go again!...... "Cr Buman said the project would depend on removal of the inner-city rail line."....... How can everything depend on the rail removal? The train service would compliment the travel experience to and from the valley etc
Posted by old boy, 6/02/2010 11:20:57 AM, on The Herald
another fantastic newcastle plan that will never exist in my lifetime. fix the cbd up NOW and then perhaps think about allowing tourists on cruise ships visit.
Posted by Troy, 6/02/2010 11:23:07 AM, on The Herald
I agree with the terminal idea but not the location. Cutting the rail is another issue but even suggesting cutting it near a tourist access area is sheer madness. The Queens Wharf area would be the worst possible place to pick, think of the traffic flow with taxi's, tourist buses, private vehicles, people wanting to look at the ship and delivery vehicles carrying supplies to the ship all trying to access the area. The traffic congestion would be worse than what it is on a normal day driving into the CBD. It would be better located at Throsby or Lee Wharf area where there is ample space to build a secure terminal and provide vehicle pickup and drop off zones and correct traffic control can be provided. A floating helicopter pontoon could be added to give tourists direct access to tourist flights. There is also ample space in the basin to turn the ships, they used to use this area when they used to swing the compass to check its accuracy on ships.
Posted by DavidB, 6/02/2010 12:05:46 PM, on The Herald
The new Channel Berth will give Newcastle one of the best cruise liner facilities in Australia. With public access, easy transport access, and a great vista almost all of the worlds cruise liners will be capable of using the very large and deep berth. The port has only had in the last 17 years 17 cruise liners make 22 trips with an average of less than 830 passengers. In the next 2 years only 5 ships are due to visit.
Posted by Bigfeller, 6/02/2010 3:33:52 PM, on The Herald
Cr Buman is applying a double standard yet again. How does expect Council to fund this when it still has, and will have long into the future a massive infrastructure backlog? The same Mr Buman opposes rate increases above the CPI ministerial cap.Increases above the cap are essential if Council is to even consider such a project. Let Newcastle Port Corp and the State Government fund it. It's their business, not Council's.
Posted by council watcher, 6/02/2010 4:12:57 PM, on The Herald
it is about5 time we get a cruise ship terminal,how embarrassing is it to have passengers disembark in an industrial area (after seeing the beautiful port on entering the harbor) and then having to be shipped over to catch a bus .it's like the chicken or the egg?? if we had a place where passengers could get of safely(and a lot cheaper for the operators) what an incentive that would be for other cruise ships to come and visit Newcastle . and i really don't see what it has to do with the removal of the railway(even though i agree with it??)you trying to get a point across cr bumann??.
Posted by dingo, 6/02/2010 5:30:15 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Should Newcastle City Council build a cruise terminal at Queens Wharf?

Yes
(79.1%)

No
(20.9%)

Total Votes: 244
Poll Date: 05 February, 2010

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
CPA Newcastle Convention 2012
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...