News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 New vision for city transport 

New vision for city transport

10 Jun, 2010 03:50 PM
GPT Group chief executive Michael Cameron has backed light rail as a suitable replacement for inner-city Newcastle's much-debated heavy rail line.

Speaking at the Hunter Business Chamber lunch in Newcastle yesterday, Mr Cameron said GPT would go ahead with its proposed $600 million retail project in the CBD if light rail was the city's preferred public transport option.

"For us it is all about reconfiguring the transport solution and replacing the current situation with something that's better," he said.

"And if that might mean light rail or a bus interchange, that would be a fantastic solution.

"The last thing we want to see is the transport process closed because obviously we want to see people coming into the CBD."

Minister for the Hunter and Newcastle MP Jodi McKay welcomed Mr Cameron's comments.

"The heavy rail line remains a barrier to good urban development," Ms McKay said.

"I understand [Mr Cameron] would support any transport solution that would open up the city.

"I believe this demonstrates that GPT is willing to work with the government and the community to revitalise our CBD."

Professor Peter Newman, a board member of the Rudd government advisory body Infrastructure Australia, backed the light rail option during a visit to Newcastle last month.

Professor Newman told Newcastle Business Club that modern light rail was capable of running long distances at high speeds and was easily accessible.

He said Newcastle had been too preoccupied with arguing over the line to look at the development opportunities light rail presented.

Last year’s Hunter Development Corporation city centre renewal report said light rail was ‘‘not viable’’, and recommended the rail line be used instead as a green corridor for pedestrians and cyclists.

The state government has yet to respond to the corporation’s central recommendation to remove the heavy rail line between a proposed interchange at Wickham and Newcastle Station.

GPT, Australia’s third-largest property group, has been criticised for calling on the government to cut the line so its retail project could proceed.

The rail debate has divided Newcastle, with Save Our Rail and Fix Our City organising rival rallies last week on the same night.

Save Our Rail president Joan Dawson said yesterday her group would accept light rail as an additional service, not as a replacement for heavy rail.

‘‘We see that it’s important for heavy rail to continue to run into Newcastle,’’ she said.

‘‘However we’re amenable to other alternatives such as putting heavy rail underground or above ground, or building buildings over it.’’

Fix Our City’s Paul Murphy said GPT’s retail project was vital for the city’s revitalisation.

‘‘We’ve been quite open in saying that light rail is certainly stage two of the development after the adoption of the HDC report for the revitalisation of the city,’’ he said.

‘‘We feel that if light rail comes into this argument at this point in time, there’s going to be a delay in the decision.’’

Mr Cameron said the Newcastle development was at the top of GPT’s $2.5billion to-do list.

‘‘We have very low gearing and we have the banks willing to lend to us and to see us grow the business so we’ve never been in better shape,’’ Mr Cameron said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Indeed light rail is a solution but for any such a system to be effective, the network scope will have to be wider than is currently proposed. Buses to replace the rail corridor is not a viable solution both in terms of traffic movements and congestion as well as total energy used. The problem with the current proposals is that they appear to lack creativity in terms of modes of transport as well as the corridors that can be used. Perhaps it might be wise for some people to have a closer look at what the Europeans are doing with light rail as well as getting expert advice from people within Australia.
Posted by Henk Luf, 10/06/2010 4:58:54 AM, on The Herald
Sounds absolutely fantastic.
Posted by PK, 10/06/2010 6:28:07 AM, on The Herald
I like Ministers McKay.s comments. Methinks there may be change in the wind! She slammed the Legal precinct suggestion for the old post office.............. $94 m in the budget,.......................... ...... and now she appreciates Mr. Cameron's comments about the rail, "the heavy rail remains a barrier to good urban development" she said. Don't telll me we may be getting a result. One can only hope.
Posted by Savio, 10/06/2010 6:39:15 AM, on The Herald
What a modern, lively and progressive city Newcastle would be with a fleet of light rail carriages running around. With a light rail system servicing the inner city we'd see the 1000's of cars that make the short 5-10 minute trips around the heart of the city disappear. Newcastle would buzz with chatter and footsteps instead of the clicking of blinkers and honking of horns that a weekend invariably brings with searching for a car park. I welcome GPT's progressive and flexible approach to investment in the city. They, unlike the State Government, are willing to listen to the public that will use such a system and they can recognise where they will need to adapt to provide the best outcome for all.
Posted by Watto81, 10/06/2010 7:02:07 AM, on The Herald
Sounds to me like blackmail. I don't see how you think that people will want to change buses/train/light rail to get into town. It shouldn't be up to a company, a small majority etc, to decide the future of Newcastle Rail, you should try asking the people who actually use the rail. Get out and ask people at the station.
Posted by Community, 10/06/2010 7:13:18 AM, on The Herald
this would be the second best option behind putting the line underground fro Cottage Creek to Newcastle
Posted by snodgrass, 10/06/2010 7:38:27 AM, on The Herald
It seems we need to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to keep GPT happy. And at the end, we have worse transport system than now because people need to change modes. Can someone come up with a plan that works with the premise that the current rail stays? Maybe underpasses with escalators. I do agree it could do with a makeover but that is surely cheaper than GPT s current thinking. Would GPT sign a contract to agree to conditions if any government money (our money) was put to making improvements to benifit GPT.
Posted by GPTtoPAY?, 10/06/2010 7:39:19 AM, on The Herald
people do not want to be hopping from buses to trains to light rail etc to make a trip.... they want to catch their preferred mode of public transport and stay on it til they get to their destination. light rail will fail. and really, gpt is a fat cat wanting to devour as much as it can at whatever cost to newcastle in order to feed itself. i dont buy it. and i dont trust them.... i thought they were leaving anyway?
Posted by judgedredd, 10/06/2010 7:42:15 AM, on The Herald
So Joan Dawson wants heavy rail AND light rail. This shows the sheer lunacy of save our rail and their failure to understand the issues facing our city. And to top it off Joan wants to build buildings over the line. " we are amenable to other alternatives such as putting heavy rail underground (exorbitant cost) or building buildings over it" Now save our rail want to become developers! Forget save the rail, I think it's time they were saved from themselves.
Posted by ramblin' Man, 10/06/2010 8:02:34 AM, on The Herald
If only.
Posted by jaga, 10/06/2010 8:06:57 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: What do you prefer for Newcastle’s inner-city rail corridor?

Heavy rail
(22.6%)

Light rail
(56.3%)

Green corridor for pedestrians and cyclists
(21.2%)

Total Votes: 846
Poll Date: 09 June, 2010

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...