News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Newcastle air-quality call heard 

Newcastle air-quality call heard

07 May, 2011 04:00 AM
Newcastle lord mayor John Tate has called for an expansion of the city's air-monitoring network after increasing concerns about the quality of air.

It follows calls from researchers and community members for funding to investigate possible changes in pollution levels.

Cr Tate said increasing numbers of constituents had raised the issue in recent times.

"People will always raise things but when you get people who wouldn't normally raise something unless it was obvious to them you have to take notice," he said.

The Herald recently reported similar concerns around the city.

Air quality is monitored by several organisations.

Newcastle City Council monitors category 2.5 particulate matter at Mayfield and the Department of Environment and Heritage monitors at National Park, Newcastle, Wallsend and Beresfield.

Two other industry-controlled monitors are at Stockton and Steel River.

"I recognise the fact there is a need to monitor on a wider scale," Cr Tate said.

"We shouldn't be jumping to conclusions. Let's get the information so we know what we are dealing with and what we have to do," he said.

He said the council's air-pollution advisory panel, set up in the 1950s, could play a greater role.

University of Newcastle air quality specialist Howard Bridgman met Cr Tate yesterday to discuss the issue.

"Because we have a new state government there is a hold for a while in terms of actions until the government decides how it is going to handle lots of different policy areas and air quality is one of them," he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Perhaps The Herald could ask John Tate and the council why they disbanded it's EPAPAC committee which provided feedback to the council on pollution matters.
Posted by Benny, 7/05/2011 8:58:54 AM, on The Herald
Most residents know there is a problem with air quality in Newcastle, just sweeping the path and seeing the little pile of coal dust tells us that.

Would the Herald obtain and publish the data from the various monitoring sources so that we are informed with some factual information about our air quality, please.

Posted by lauriell, 7/05/2011 9:06:13 AM, on The Herald
One of the first steps should be to place the data from the council's monitor on the Council Web site with real time data.

The minutes from the air pollution advisory panel should also be placed on the web site as it provides a very valuable community resource with 60 years of data, observations and efforts

This way the community can be advised of the true position and the debate can be based on facts.

Posted by bigfeller, 7/05/2011 1:06:31 PM, on The Herald
Residents raise many issues, concerns. Should elected leaders wait until a louder voice comes from the community? That's not the type of leadership, management we need. As long as nobody knocks on his door, should the problems be ignored? Is that how the responsibility should be perceived? Air quality has been monitored; data has been available for a responsible to act. There are sufficient monitors and data; wider scale monitoring isn't needed. Call for more monitors is another excuse to drag the issue. If no one uses the information, data collection is a waste of tax payers' money. What have the Council's air pollution advisors done since 1950s? Mayor may have listened to concerns about the air pollution for the first time; he said "let's get the information first so that we know what we are dealing with and what we have to do". The information was there for years! As if he did so much, he uses the new government as an excuse for actions that are on hold. Actions were on hold for the last 20 years! Just look around and see undermaintained buildings, ruins in Newcastle. No mention about rising crime, illegal brothels. We hope, Uni's specialist will help to bring us fresh air.
Posted by FG, 7/05/2011 2:04:38 PM, on The Herald
It is good to hear the fine particles which are small enough to get into our lungs, PM 2.5, are now being monitored. We also need the ultrafine particles that are small enough to get inside cells and alter our genes. PM 0.1 to be monitored aswell. We need the PM 2.5 monitoring results to be published on the web real time so that those particularly sensitive to high levels can get into an air filtered safety zone. We need public education about what is needed to make a space free of harmful particles.
Posted by steve robinson, 8/05/2011 10:07:11 AM, on The Herald
Weather man from the NBN who does an excellent comprehensive weather report should add pollution levels to the report. It will increase awareness and put pressure on the coal industry to improve their dust suppression technology. I can only think of benefits out of such an action.
Posted by Taipan, 9/05/2011 10:30:08 AM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...