News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Newcastle business leaders launch Fix Our City campaign 

Newcastle business leaders launch Fix Our City campaign

14 Aug, 2009 04:00 AM
NEWCASTLE business leaders have sent a blunt message to the NSW Government Fix Our City!

A campaign will be launched today urging government action on the Hunter Development Corporation's Newcastle City Centre Renewal Report.

The urban renewal plan, which embraces investment for tertiary education facilities in the city's business district, an upgraded legal precinct and a new transport system, was released in May and calls for state and federal government finance.

Organisations including Hunter Business Chamber, Hunter Advantage, Newcastle Trades Hall Council, Newcastle Alliance and the Property Council are throwing their support behind the "Fix Our City" campaign.

They have called for the immediate implementation of HDC's recommendations after a Hunter Valley Research Foundation survey revealed 93 per cent of residents backed a program of renewal for the city centre.

Hunter Business Chamber chief executive Peter Shinnick said developers were ready to invest in the city but were waiting for the Government to move on the plan.

"The community has provided a clear message to the NSW Government that it wants support for the HDC report, a report it commissioned," Mr Shinnick said.

"With 93 per cent of the public agreeing with the need for change, now is the time to see this being accepted by the NSW Government."

Mr Shinnick said if the Government did not endorse the HDC report developers would walk away and the region would "luck out".

Hunter Advantage spokesman Newcastle developer Jeff McCloy said it was imperative government action was taken now to stop the decay of "our great city."

"We have a blueprint for positive change in the form of the report, now we need a commitment to move," Mr McCloy said.

He said a Newcastle City Council resolution had endorsed the Hunter Development Corporation report.

"Let's get it done," Mr McCloy said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Overdue and most is easily done. The serious question is over what time scale and how is it to be paid for? For a 25 to 50 year vision it is important to have a framework to build on. I fear that three difficulties will be the cost, who will pay for it and Sea level rise / flooding are a problem globally? Previous articles have stated that there is noone thinking of its effect on the western part of our city which is mooted to be the city center. This is the obvious elephant in the room and wont go away just because its ignored. So its when , how much , who is paying and how the worlds greatest subject effecting the globe will effect us? I hear 25 years, vastly different amounts , cashed up governments and a stunning silence bordering on denial on flooding. I believe any vision and strategy is important , in fact paramount. Then by a filtering of whats called 'reality checks" we can arrive at what must be done and then what can be done. All should be well engaged in this process as the results will depend on good realistic thinking with true providence as its intended outcome. Scheming, wishing and hoping - but with true providence as its outcome is all good&well.
Posted by wombat, 14/08/2009 5:03:35 AM, on The Herald
Are they fair-dinkum about pursuing this or is it just more of the talk and hubris that has been going on for more than 40 years. Zzzzzzzz!
Posted by jake 69, 14/08/2009 6:21:08 AM, on The Herald
i am comforted by the way that a new bridge at thornton is being funded. That is the developers are paying for it. Obviously removal of the rail will follow by the same template so then the government has only to give the rules by which it may happen -that is when a substantila amount of development has taken place and the money is paid by the developers then the rail removal and interchange may be funded and built. Solid belts and braces protection for the public and certainty for the developers. Let the rules be drafted -well.
Posted by thorton bridge, 14/08/2009 8:37:04 AM, on The Herald
No, we need more talk first. That would be the Newcastle way. And some consultants from Sydney.
Posted by Jibber, 14/08/2009 8:46:01 AM, on The Herald
If we're talking the same developers that are responsible for the debacle referred to as "Honeysuckle", then they couldnt walk away fast enough for me!
Posted by unclebarry, 14/08/2009 8:49:23 AM, on The Herald
I couldn't agree more..lets DO IT !!!!!
Posted by IOT, 14/08/2009 8:49:42 AM, on The Herald
I think it is time to accept the fact that no matter what planning, decisions or injection of funds are made the Newcastle CBD will never be returned as the thriving commercial hub as people would hope. It is also time to accept that its demise has been time and changes in peoples needs. The CBD may have to be redeveloped as others have suggested to a more central location that is easily accessible from all areas, also again hopefully close to a rail access facility, and the existing CBD redeveloped with more of a residential aspect with some commercial and retail services retained for the areas immediate needs. The existing rail will still be available to transport people who shift into the new residential areas of the CBD to other areas of the Hunter and State as required. Even the RTA has realised the need to centralise operations, it has closed its Charlestown and Cardiff offices and combined both into one located at the commercial business centre at the Warners Bay roundabout opposite the High School at the end of Hillsborough Rd which is central to all suburbs. Could this be the start of a trend towards a new central CBD?.
Posted by DavidB, 14/08/2009 9:36:59 AM, on The Herald
i think 87% percent of the public would disagree with the 93% agreeing. What a bunch of loaded questions on a survey from people visiting a website. hardly a canvas of the `public'
Posted by house of pain, 14/08/2009 10:06:45 AM, on The Herald
Why is it up to the NSW government fix the mess that NCC has created? The state is responsible for public transport, hospitals, roads, the police etc. The city is responsible for urban planning and development. It is up to the city to face up to it's own shortcomings and remedy them instead of whining to the state like a pack of spoiled brats. Newcastle the world owes you nothing. If you start encouraging development instead of discouraging it and we might see some positive change instead of more decay!
Posted by RIP_Newy, 14/08/2009 10:40:15 AM, on The Herald
Ree's should show some leadership here and tell his staff to reply to this motley crew of developers and other self-serving opportunists with the famous "tell 'em their joking" line from the classic oz movie "The Castle". Taxpayers money is needed elsewhere in the region for a whole raft of other vital projects.
Posted by loctite, 14/08/2009 10:50:51 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB44 plans 12%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 6%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 2%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 2%
5) Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press

Travelworld_See the World
 
School Newspaper Competition


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...