News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Newcastle City Council light rail talk rejected 

Newcastle City Council light rail talk rejected

23 Jul, 2009 04:00 AM
A LIGHT rail system would not work in Newcastle, the State Government organisation charged with looking at city transport options said yesterday.

The assertion from Hunter Development Corporation (HDC) came after Newcastle City Council put light rail back on the agenda on Tuesday night.

Councillors resolved to take a one-day trip to Melbourne to look at a heavy rail line that has been converted to carry trams.

They hoped to learn how that city's system might be implemented in Newcastle.

The corporation had assessed city transport options, as part of its Newcastle City Centre Renewal Report, which was issued recently.

The bold vision for reviving the heart of Newcastle includes cutting the rail line at Wickham and providing an improved integrated public transport system.

A corporation spokesman said yesterday that light rail was not considered feasible.

"It's each councillor's prerogative to weigh up all the options for themselves," he said.

"However, light rail cannot achieve operational viability running along the corridor between Broadmeadow and Newcastle East. Not enough people live close to the corridor and it is not connected to a much wider network. By contrast, Melbourne's network is vast and is connected to a vastly bigger population."

Newcastle light rail advocates and Lord Mayor John Tate have cited Queensland's Gold Coast as an example to follow.

Gold Coast City Council secured $365 million from the Federal Government recently to build a light rail system. But the council has committed $150 million of its own money and expects to attract private investment.

The corporation spokesman said the Gold Coast project illustrated the advantages of securing a commitment from all levels of government.

[PI9016] Hunter Development Corporation hopes to share its ideas for rejuvenating inner-city Newcastle with a new audience.

The state organisation is seeking public feedback on its Newcastle City Centre Renewal Report.

The 112-page document is already available to the public and the corporation has developed a two-minute video that illustrates the report's concepts to try to reach a wider audience.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
John Tate is now pushing this barrow so that he looks good for his upcoming State election campaign. It is not a bold vision it is a venture in stupidity. The State Govt does not want it and can not afford it. This is wedge politics by the Lord Mayor as he hopes to be the next Member for Newcastle. This is a snake oil tactic from a man who would dig that rail line up with his own hands. Well that was before he launched his state campaign in Council this week. The classic flip flop is alive and well. Hopefully Newcastle residents will see through the 30% Mayor's tokenism - after all he has done nothing in 29 years who would want him sitting around being Lord Mayor and State Member collecting heaps of tax/rate payers wages and doing nothing.
Posted by Westie, 23/07/2009 7:36:39 AM, on The Herald
dont we wish that we had the tourism base of the gold coast and the population concentration of melbourne or even just western sydney . They all have that vital ingrediant -large surrounding populations, tourist visitors (maybe not WS) and the associated necessary commercial activity. Until a "critical mass" of commercial need to spenders to be in the city is reached it may be a serious case of examining every way that our "actual mass" can be serviced by public transport. A 25 year plan requires 25 years of planning and investment that returns by assuring growth to build on. Newcastle was not built in a day nor will it change to what we wish in 25 days -yes it will take 25 years of carefull ,diligent , secure, mindfull,wise planning and no wishing will change that. In the meantime every piece of providence producing productive proving process will be needed to spend any large dollars (if they can be found). Seeking and finding the best solution will always justify the effort and time taken. Then of course the state government has the say with perhaps federal funding?
Posted by we_wish, 23/07/2009 8:01:57 AM, on The Herald
The plan is for light rail into the city as the first step towards a larger light rail network, and a more comprehensive, integrated public transport system in general. Also, light rail into the city would actually be more cost effective to implement than ripping up the line. It would provide a future-proof public transport option and act as a drawcard for the city.
Posted by Jim, 23/07/2009 8:08:40 AM, on The Herald
No way is any sane government going to pay millions to remove a perfectly good public transport facility then pay millions more to replace it with a new public transport facility. Only greedy, insane developers would want such a farce.
Posted by mikk, 23/07/2009 8:25:51 AM, on The Herald
Newcastle used to have a great tram system but it was a total failure because of lack of patronage. to see the map check out this link http://contribute.abc.net.au/_New castle-Tram-Map-1/photo /2576287/32422.html
Posted by Bigfeller, 23/07/2009 8:45:30 AM, on The Herald
Why should we not make the Newcastle LGA a highly car friendly area encouraging the maximum use of cars in a highly efficient and environmentally manner?
Posted by Bigfeller, 23/07/2009 8:49:07 AM, on The Herald
Isn't the whole point of light rail that you could also go beyond the current corridor into places like Darby St, The Juntion etc? Places where people actually want to go...
Posted by Rod, 23/07/2009 9:50:04 AM, on The Herald
The council doesn't have enough money to finish the renovation of Newcastle Baths or enough commercial nouse to manage a commercial enterprise. Leave Newcastle Buses to look after losing money on mass transport - at least Novocastrians are not paying to make it up.
Posted by newtus, 23/07/2009 9:51:12 AM, on The Herald
So they're planning to relocate part of the University to the city (around Civic) but they're going to terminate the rail line before Wickham? Surely they need some sort of public transport link between the new interchange and the new campus. There are going to be plenty of students rushing between classes in the City campus and the Warabrook campus, and if there isn't a convenient public transport option, we are going to end up with most of them going by car, causing further traffic problems for Newcastle.
Posted by AH, 23/07/2009 9:54:01 AM, on The Herald
looks unreal sooner it is done the better take the city foward its a joke at moment
Posted by g, 23/07/2009 9:55:44 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB44 plans 12%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 6%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 2%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 2%
5) Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press

Travelworld_See the World
 
School Newspaper Competition


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...