News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Newcastle city post office up for auction 

Newcastle city post office up for auction

22 Apr, 2010 05:34 PM
THE historic former Newcastle Post Office is set to go under the hammer after years of neglect.

The landmark city building has been listed with Sydney-based real estate company Professionals Newtown and will be auctioned at Sydney's Grace Hotel on May 13, unless it is sold before.

Professionals principal Steve Kremisis said he had already received expressions of interest, but refused to elaborate.

"There is someone looking at buying it, we've had interest," Mr Kremisis told The Herald yesterday.

Newcastle Lord Mayor John Tate said it was "unlikely" the council would make a bid but said he would support a joint bid with state and federal governments.

"It's one of those buildings that is going to be very expensive to bring up to standard," Cr Tate said.

"Council has got enough buildings to look after, particularly City Hall, why would be buy another? It's ratepayers' money we would be spending on the thing."

Newcastle MP Jodi McKay said "any decision to purchase the building would be based on ensuring the best outcome for the community and future of the post office".

Sydney developer Sean Ngu bought the heritage listed property from the Federal Government in 2002 for about $2 million.

The building has lain derelict for years and has long been a haven for squatters and vandals.

Earlier this year, Mr Ngu denied rumours the building was for sale, saying he planned to redevelop it into an upmarket nightspot, complete with a lounge and reception centre on the top floor, a ground-level pub and a bar in the basement.

He was granted development approval in October last year to convert the post office into a pub or function centre and was given a Hoteliers License to operate 15 poker machines from the site.

Advertising for the post office auction describes it as an "iconic landmark", complete with "high ornate ceilings and marble columns".

Fix Our City spokesman and developer Jeff McCloy said he would not be interested in bidding because of the state of Newcastle's central business district.

"The state of the city, the intransigence of the State Government on the rail line, has stopped me doing things like that, so I won't," he said.

Hunter developer Hilton Grugeon said he also would not make an offer and anyone thinking of investing in Newcastle at the moment "must have rocks in their head".

"The Government is incapable of moving forward," he said.

Ms McKay said the Government was committed to the city and cited the temporary cruise ship terminal, land for University of Newcastle, money for Renew Newcastle and the draft coastal masterplan as examples.

"It is about time certain developers stopped talking Newcastle down and started doing their bit to renew the city centre," she said.

Walsh Bay-based CMF Commercial property development director John Buckman said it would be difficult to put a price tag on the historic property.

"We don't actually know [what it will go for], because we don't really know what it's worth," he said.

"It has had a fair bit of negative press and to be frank, rightly so - but there's a great opportunity here to do something."

Mr Buckman said it was not a foregone conclusion that the site would be turned into a bar. "It could be an office space or a retail showroom," he said.

The auction is on May 13 at 10.30am.

Mr Ngu could not be contacted by The Herald yesterday.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
There are too many impediments to development as a pub or nightclub and too many structural, parking, environmental (BASIX) and heritage issues to make it viable as a residential development. The high ceilings and parking problems dictate against its use as a reception centre except at a loss. Unless the rail line is replaced by more parking stations, there are NEVER going to be enough PAYING customers to cover the enormous running costs. So it should be re-purchased by Australia Post, refurbished with Federal funds and turned back into Government ownership. This article is likely to attract a fresh set of loonies attacking developers and presenting illogical, emotive arguments to maintain the heavy industrial rail system into the city.
Posted by Concerned Citizen, 22/04/2010 4:32:40 AM, on The Herald
The pro rail and anti everything else groups have a wonderful opportunity to pool their resources, purchase this building and turn it in to a show case to show the greedy developers of this city what can be done with a derelict building. I guess they wont because its easy to sit on the side lines and snipe at those who wish to take the CBD forward.
Posted by thinkitthrough, 22/04/2010 5:12:51 AM, on The Herald
This will be a real test of the worth of land in the old CBD. Given that HDC and others now say the CBD is Wickham who would want the site?
Posted by Bigfeller, 22/04/2010 5:17:55 AM, on The Herald
If GPT pulls out and the rail line stays the value of the Post Office go up sharply.
Posted by Molly, 22/04/2010 5:20:34 AM, on The Herald
More and more spin from Jodi McKay and NSW Labor - oh look what we have done for Newcastle, a 'temporary' cruise ship terminal, but no commitment to anything permanent, a block of land for the Uni serviced by a single lane road that is already choked with traffic, mmm thats a good idea, money for renew Newcastle, which is probably a incredibly minute % of what the region contributes to state, sorry Sydney, coffers and yet another draft plan for part of the City but I cant see any commitment for funding the implementation of same! Oh thats right NSW Labor had to find $500 million to lose on the Sydney Metro - imagine what that cash would do in Newcastle, thats right buy GPT out and get on with it! Before anyone in NSW Labor accuses developers of talking Newcastle down remember who it is that has starved our City of funds and status for the last decade or more. Roll on the 2011 election please and lets throw these inept group of self serving politicians out with a big swing!
Posted by morespin, 22/04/2010 7:07:15 AM, on The Herald
Newcastle council owns 3 late trading inner city hotels. Queens Wharf Brewery, Civic hotel (since burnt down) and the Clarendon. Why we are still in the ownership of problematic hotels beggars belief. NCC must sell these licensed premises. No better way for a small part of this revenue to be spent than purchase the post office and convert it into say an annex of Newcastle Art gallery. Close to Newcastle rail station. No better way to reinvigorate the eastern end of the CBD with sustainable tourism. A local Philanthropist was willing to display their internationally significant map collection in this restored public owned facility. Instead NCC continues to court and serve the likes of the liquor industry with their well known concern for the public's safety and well being.
Posted by arnold, 22/04/2010 7:56:38 AM, on The Herald
Who has the most money will win. So looks like a Pub will be in there
Posted by Yeah_Right, 22/04/2010 8:08:42 AM, on The Herald
Clearly the Newcastle PO should be owned by Australia Post and used for the purpose for which it was designed. It's sale was very shortsighted. Australia Post has not been privatized. It has a responsibility to maintain it's heritage. It would also be a really interesting story if the NH could reveal how many/which of the CBD "bomb sites" were owned by developers and prominent "investors" in expectation of Government funding for reconstruction. Rumours abound!
Posted by ReturnNewcastlePostOfficeInPublicHands, 22/04/2010 8:27:55 AM, on The Herald
"It is about time certain developers stopped talking Newcastle down and started doing their bit to renew the city centre," she said. AT LAST something sensible from Jodi McKay. The Government HAS put money into Newcastle. The Council DOES NOT zone sites as DERELICT. The only ones who can fix Hunter Street are the property owners, and they have proved themselves to be property SPECULATORS rather than developers. (Speculators want a quick, high profit and no long term involvement. Developers are more committed to the town.) Will the Herald do a series on who owns each of the derelict sites, how long they have held them, and the history of their spurious DA's designed to STALL development in the town until the public purse makes their properties more valuable at auction? Speculators!! The council should be increasing rates on eyesores or fining the owners, or maybe the State Government needs to do some compulsory acquistions (at rock-bottom prices) in the public interest.
Posted by Qwerty, 22/04/2010 8:28:02 AM, on The Herald
Its time that the Fix Our City mob put forward a plan as to how to do it. Action speaks louder than words. Any real and genuine plan would havethe heavy rail as a focal point for the future asit is the only way to populate the area.
Posted by Spinner, 22/04/2010 8:30:54 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
UP FOR GRABS: The former Newcastle Post Office will go under the hammer next month.
UP FOR GRABS: The former Newcastle Post Office will go under the hammer next month.
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Should the Newcastle post office building be returned to public ownership?

Yes
(71.7%)

No
(28.3%)

Total Votes: 318
Poll Date: 21 April, 2010

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...