News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Newcastle coal-loader's work begins 

Newcastle coal-loader's work begins

18 Feb, 2010 04:00 AM
NEWCASTLE Coal Infrastructure Group's $1 billion coal loader on[DS] Kooragang Island is a step closer to commercial operation after receiving its first trainload of coal.

The 74 wagons of coal arrived yesterday morning from the Wilpinjong mine near Gulgong, about 275 kilometres away by rail.

While the coal has a market value of about $750,000, it is not destined for sale.

As NSW Ports and Waterways Minister Paul McLeay observed yesterday, the "sacrificial coal" will be used to form the base of the terminal's coal stockpiles.

NCIG was unwilling to give firm dates on a commercial start-up project but The Herald was told the company hopes to load at least one test vessel of coal next month and to have regular shipments running by the middle of the year.

NCIG project director Rob Yeates said the commissioning process would continue throughout the year.

Mr McLeay congratulated NCIG on yesterday's milestone, saying the loader's equipment passed its initial test with flying colours.

"This is an exciting development in a long-term project," Mr McLeay said.

NCIG which has BHP Billiton as its biggest shareholder was formed in September 2004 by a breakaway group of coal companies unhappy with Newcastle's infamous coal queues.

Mr McLeay said the Government approved the new loader in April 2007 and work began in October of that year.

NCIG's first stage will handle up to 33 million tonnes a year, and the company has approval for a second stage, which would double capacity.

The Rio Tinto-managed Port Waratah Coal Services operates Newcastle's two established coal loaders, which have a combined capacity of about 110 million tonnes a year.

PWCS announced this month that it was spending $670 million to add 20 million tonnes to its Kooragang terminal.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Not a problem! Kevin will fix up the carbon emitters with his "great big tax". Oh no he won't, his NSW mates need the coal royalties.
Posted by Steve, 18/02/2010 6:30:05 AM, on The Herald
Its along way from the peace and beauty of the sandy river bank, great fishing spots and the pleasures of nature.
Posted by Bigfeller, 18/02/2010 9:00:48 AM, on The Herald
That is great news - now can they move the ones near Mayfield East over there too? (so my home isn't coated with coal dust each day).
Posted by Jaded, 18/02/2010 9:08:45 AM, on The Herald
$1 billion spend on a sunset industry. That could have gone a long way to developing alternatives to coal.
Posted by Brad, 18/02/2010 10:21:24 AM, on The Herald
are we (newcastle) expected to be excited by this? we had the chance, when bhp shut down, to work to become the hub of a great tourist region. we have great beaches and a great river, north is port stephens, south is lake macquarie and west is the vineyards.... but no, we sold our souls for a rock called coal. and we will take a very long time to shake off the dirty dusty industrial town tag.
Posted by ffs, 18/02/2010 2:37:38 PM, on The Herald
To Brad: The coal is being exported to China, Korea, etc. Persuade those countries to develop alternatives, also please detail in engineering terms, how to develop these alternatives. In the meantime, let Australians make a living from the industry.
Posted by Mac, 18/02/2010 3:04:53 PM, on The Herald
@Mac - most of the profits are being exported too, as all the big miners are transnationals. The demand argument is stupid anyway - there's big demand for child porn, heroin, landmines etc., do you feel compelled to supply? In 'engineering terms', start with 'dont dig any more open-cuts, pull down the coal loaders, and free up our (once) beautiful port for sustainable dvelopment'...
Posted by pete, 18/02/2010 9:34:30 PM, on The Herald
Sorry bigfeller, i know that tiny bit of sand where the windmill is, isnt much for fishing anymore - assuming i dont call security and have you run off from the site. Sorry Jaded, long term plan is for more coal loading wharves on the old BHP site too! Sorry Brad, no it wouldnt. Though i did suggest to my boss that we could use the windmill to power the next coal loader...... that would offset its carbons a bit. Sorry ffs, keeps the greenies happy with their welfare. Mac, hat is off to you. Without the coal this country would be a sewer, instead of just a toilet.
Posted by Nuclear Wessels, 18/02/2010 10:09:42 PM, on The Herald
The only thing "sacrificial" about this coal is the human race.
Posted by Peter, 18/02/2010 11:48:26 PM, on The Herald
An ethical audit of old king coal is long overdue.
Posted by armada, 19/02/2010 5:43:34 PM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
TRIAL: The third coal-loader.
TRIAL: The third coal-loader.

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
CPA Newcastle Convention 2012
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...