News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Newcastle gas project oil spill risk 

Newcastle gas project oil spill risk

11 Oct, 2010 03:00 AM
A confidential report on an exploratory gas drilling project off the coast of Newcastle has revealed the proposal's potential environmental risks, including the possibility of oil spills.

The NSW government refused to release the report, saying it did not have to be made public under Commonwealth law.

But the Newcastle Herald has obtained a copy, which details the plan's potential risks to the environment and the possibility of an oil spill.

Advent Energy, through its subsidiary company Asset Energy, plans to begin drilling for natural gas 55 kilometres off Newcastle next month.

Asset Energy prepared the report for the state and federal governments, which are considering whether to allow the drilling.

The report listed the plan's environmental risks and potential effects, which included:

¦ An uncontrolled blow-out causing an oil spill that continues for up to 11 weeks.

¦ A whale colliding with the drilling rig, threatening workers' lives.

¦ Physiological damage to sensitive marine fauna from underwater noise from drilling and seismic activity.

¦ Chemical, oil and diesel spills causing acute toxic effects on marine organisms.

¦ Marine life negatively affected by water discharges 15 to 20 degrees above the sea temperature.

Advent Energy executive director David Breeze said the company was "very confident the risks are being adequately addressed".

Lake Macquarie councillor Phillipa Parsons, who leads a coalition of groups opposed to the drilling plan, said she had "serious concerns" about the potential for environmental damage to the coast and marine life.

The report said galley waste and sewage disposal would "almost certainly" cause pollution and nutrient enrichment in the surrounding ocean.

Another near certainty was that the Ocean Patriot drilling rig would disturb marine organisms on the ocean floor.

Crushed rock would be discharged continuously to the seabed, smothering marine life in a 1.1-kilometre radius from the drilling site.

The drilling rig would be well lit and a 500-metre exclusion zone established, the report said. Up to 12 anchors would hold the rig in place, causing further seabed disturbance.

The rig's location would be communicated to commercial fishers, shipping operators and port authorities.

The rig will have support helicopters, which could disturb seabirds.

Four scenarios were listed that could cause an oil spill, including a refuelling incident, collision, subsea blow-out and subsea rupture.

Emergency plans would be enacted in the "unlikely event of an accidental oil spill into the ocean" and an oil spill contingency plan had been prepared.

In the report, the company played down many of the more extreme risks, saying they were unlikely. It admitted that commercial fishing and shipping activity would probably be disrupted.

It was considered possible that the rig could cause hydrocarbons and metals' pollution.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
My question is - whether it be oil gas or coal, it's necessary to extract for our own use, but why gouge and destroy our own country for everyone else? They will not come to our aid when things run out. They will laugh at us for being fools. They all make loads of money off our assets and we will have none. We WILL be the fools.
Posted by Rose- Lake Macquarie, 11/10/2010 6:59:23 AM, on The Herald
If things are good there is no reason why they should not be open and transparent.
Posted by Bigfeller, 11/10/2010 7:12:31 AM, on The Herald
Do we want energy...or do we not?
Posted by Tiger, 11/10/2010 7:29:09 AM, on The Herald
Jodi, you are prepared to stand by and let them begin drilling. Not only that, your government has been prepared to hide this damning document from the public.This labor government has to go.


Posted by judgedredd, 11/10/2010 7:44:34 AM, on The Herald
Is our NSW State Government completely insane in allowing such a proposal to go ahead? This industry has no plan for dealing with disasters (re the recent Gulf of Mexico catastrophe and the one closer to home near Broome). All they know how to do is make a profit and wreck the planet to do it. It should not be allowed. We are insane if we allow this to happen near our beautiful coastline. Look at what the mining industry is doing to the Hunter Valley. Iit's being destroyed and turned into a lunar landscape. Do we want our coastline to be turned into a wasteland as well?
Posted by Novocastrius, 11/10/2010 7:47:45 AM, on The Herald
The benefits, ie natural gas to power the now-coal fired power stations, is worth the risk. The fallout from coal-powered power stations is a far worse reality.
Posted by Progressive Thinker, 11/10/2010 7:54:42 AM, on The Herald
Don't complain about electricity prices if you're not willing to seek alternatives.
Posted by Fair Go, 11/10/2010 8:35:55 AM, on The Herald
I know someone who was on the beach and they said that half the people in the protest were gathered by walking up and down the beach pleading for support.
Posted by alwysabckstory, 11/10/2010 8:43:28 AM, on The Herald
We should welcome the chance to use gas instead of dirty coal to generate our electricity. The environmental damage caused by the drilling process is tiny compared to that caused by continuing to burn coal. Gas produces half the CO2 that coal does in power generation.So, do we put that chance at risk because a drilling rig might have a spill of a bit of waste? No way. That would be a real shame.
Posted by Flatty, 11/10/2010 8:46:37 AM, on The Herald
The NSW coast is untouched. No offshore rigs operate along it. Why change this? Think of the Gulf of Mexico and the damage that has been done to the economy. The oil spill has destroyed their long-established commercial fisheries and tourism, It will take years for these to be re-established. The oil/gas platform does not provide enough jobs to cover those lost from these industries as it is just too specialised. Just say no. We can get the same benefits if we develop renewable energy technology and become a centre of excellence for the whole world and export our expertise. This is worth more the 50 years' supply of gas.
Posted by Gulf Of Mexico, 11/10/2010 11:12:20 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Protesters on Nobbys Beach yesterday.
Protesters on Nobbys Beach yesterday.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
11 October, 2010
POLL
Q: Is the proposed gas drilling off the Newcastle coast worth the risks?

Yes
(52.4%)

No
(47.6%)

Total Votes: 309
Poll Date: 10 October, 2010

Most popular articles


 
Landcom Sanctuary 190512
 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...