News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Newcastle Harbour clean-up continues following oil spill 

Newcastle Harbour clean-up continues following oil spill

29 Sep, 2010 04:00 AM
A month after a coal ship spilled 12 tonnes of oil into Newcastle Harbour, crews are continuing to clean up oil from marine life and rocks.

Newcastle Port Corporation said yesterday they expected the clean-up from the August 25 spill to be finished in early October.

The areas worst affected were the north arm of the Hunter River, especially the north bank near Stockton Bridge around to Stockton, and near the coal-loader.

Recreational fishers appeared undeterred by white-uniformed clean-up crews yesterday, with families dropping a line off boats and the shore.

Bait and tackle shops nearby reported being busier than ever for a school holiday period.

But there have been reports that crabs have disappeared from the coastline.

Wholesale oyster farmer Terry Jones said the slick had wiped out his leases, about 6million oysters, and customers were not interested.

‘‘I can’t eat them, I spit them out,’’ he said.

Long-time prawner Geoff Hyde said the prawning season did not start until November, but they were concerned.

He said fishermen were unable to gauge the oil’s effects because it was the off-season.

‘‘It will have to affect the crabs and invertebrates, it will smother them,’’ he said.

Investment and Industry NSW said there had been no reports of dead fish in the area.

A NSW Food Authority spokeswoman said there was no information to suggest there were any long-term food safety issues with seafood caught in the area.

Of the 32 pelicans captured by volunteer groups after the spill, 18 have been released, six are on the Central Coast and eight are still recuperating at Taronga Zoo.

Bird experts predict those released will return to the Hunter. Hunter Bird Observers Club vice-president Mick Roderick said they spotted one pelican and a cormorant covered in oil during a boat trip last Friday.

Newcastle Port Corporation chief Gary Webb said the clean-up included scientific advice from state government agencies.

‘‘The oil on the water has been gone for weeks, really what has been impacted is the shoreline.’’

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Really? Why is this clean-up taking so long? How many people are doing the clean-up? Has the offending shipping company paid any money? Who is in charge of putting together the final damages bill for the spill? Second-rate treatment for Newcastle...again.
Posted by judgedredd, 29/09/2010 5:51:58 AM, on The Herald
I hope the Port Corp has a major rethink about the handling of spills because efforts at containment seem to have been a total failure. This was only 12 tonnes and has spread far and wide.
Posted by Bigfeller, 29/09/2010 8:04:00 AM, on The Herald
Bigfeller - maybe you should have a major rethink about the effort and time that actually goes into cleaning these up. It is a lot easier said than done.
Posted by JM, 29/09/2010 12:02:19 PM, on The Herald
Judge, the Port Corporation has an understanding from the ship's insurer to cover the costs, and the clean-up is proceeding as it was expected to.
Posted by whizzz, 29/09/2010 12:23:20 PM, on The Herald
Can't help but feel it is slow...
Posted by judgedredd, 29/09/2010 2:04:14 PM, on The Herald
If the clean-up is 'proceeding as expected' I suppose our expectations must be pretty low. Whatever happened to all these you-beaut devices we have seen on the New Inventors? Everything is wonderful in hindsight,action speaks louder than words! Too late after the event. All sounds too familiar.
Posted by mas, 29/09/2010 2:46:47 PM, on The Herald
To those with negative comments, I suggest you leave actions to experts., It appears you have no maritime expertise and don't know what is involved. Could some of the oil come from the road drainage system which has vehicles continually leaking oil in great quantities?
Posted by Mac, 29/09/2010 6:08:05 PM, on The Herald
MJ I was not intending to complain about what has been going on and have no doubt the clean up crews have been trying. However I believe there is alot to learn in order to reduce the impact next time.
Posted by Bigfeller, 29/09/2010 7:22:55 PM, on The Herald
What type of oil was spilt? I havent seen any info on that. Fuel oil? Lube oil? Hydraulic oil? (preferrably brand type if anyone knows?)
Posted by Chris, 30/09/2010 12:00:10 AM, on The Herald
@ mac.... how dare us have an opinion...... and your qualifications and position relative to this problem are what? your last comment, questioning whether some of the oil may have come from motor vehicles is weird without knowing why you want to shift the blame... i am no expert, but over a month to clean up an oil spill seems to be way too long.... i would like to know how many people are involved in the actual clean up Mr know it all Mac? i am prepared to bet that it's very few. we deserve better. we should demand better. not just sit back and take whatever is dished up to us with no questions asked.
Posted by judgedredd, 30/09/2010 1:01:59 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
 CAST: Fishing near Stockton Bridge. –  Picture by Jonathan Carroll
CAST: Fishing near Stockton Bridge. – Picture by Jonathan Carroll
CRUDE STAIN: A pelican stained with oil last week.
CRUDE STAIN: A pelican stained with oil last week.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles


 
Landcom Sanctuary 190512
 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...