News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Newcastle leaders support parking in park 

Newcastle leaders support parking in park

17 Feb, 2010 04:00 AM
A RADICAL plan to dig up parts of Civic Park and build a car park under the site has gained Newcastle business leaders' support.

Lord Mayor John Tate floated the idea at a Newcastle Business Club lunch yesterday, saying it was an "innovation" that could go a long way in solving inner-city parking woes.

Unlike the expected "furore" from some, Cr Tate received a warm reception.

"Once people understand that we're not going to obliterate Civic Park they see it in a different context," Cr Tate said.

"I've had a lot of people saying 'geez, this is worth thinking about'."

The Hunter Business Chamber supports the proposal.

President Brett Derwin said it was consistent with the chamber's plan to revitalise Newcastle's CBD into an education and civic precinct.

"The Central Business District must be revitalised and many individual elements need to be examined, costed and considered within the broader context and the Lord Mayor's Civic Park idea is one that should be included," he said.

The radical plan could be the key to Newcastle meeting increased parking demands once the University of Newcastle moved into the city and new city developments emerged, Mr Derwin said.

"We cannot afford to simply say no because such a concept might challenge existing thinking, or in this case, existing uses," he said.

Cr Tate said that if the plan was found to be feasible it was important that all existing car parking stations remained under council management to avoid parking price increases.

"There is no privately owned car parks in the city, so even if it was privately run they couldn't put their price up more because they wouldn't attract any customers," he said.

"Council controls the price of parking and I favour having low-cost parking."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
'geez, this is worth thinking about'." It could double as an under water theme park.......
Posted by old boy, 17/02/2010 6:43:57 AM, on The Herald
“My O My” here we go again with another example of councils short sightedness and self center-ness. Who will be the users of the carpark given council chambers is directly across the road ? Council Staff. The 400 car spots will be filled with council cars through the day with very little vacant spots for those who want to visit the derelict buildings plaguing the CBD at the moment. Or is GPT looking for council money for car parking before they develop the CBD.
Posted by 2b, 17/02/2010 7:34:01 AM, on The Herald
Typical, the community thinks its a stupid idea so the local so called leaders pull the "I know better than you" and come out and support it. The stupidity of this city is beyond belief. Tate says we have a parking problem so lets dig up a park while Bumans sprouting, if we do anything we must rip up the rail line first. o Mr Buman will this fix the parking problem too? I rekon we should stop the busses too, then use the bus stops for parking then all will be good.
Posted by Nafe, 17/02/2010 7:36:40 AM, on The Herald
Its a teriffic idea Cr Tate, with minimal impact on the park once complete.
Posted by horse, 17/02/2010 7:38:00 AM, on The Herald
This is a band-aid and not a solution to parking problems in the CBD we need to be looking for solutions to why people are not utilising public transport effectively and why all of the studies seem to be around traffic in the CBD - lets not spend a massive amount of money on a huge engineering feat when we can get better value fixing roads and car parks in the suburbs, bus interchanges and shelters and supporting better rail solutions. I am certainly not warm to this ludicrous idea and from what I am led to believe it is not an original idea it has been suggested before and deemed unviable.
Posted by Mike Jackson, 17/02/2010 8:34:07 AM, on The Herald
Of course business leaders support a car park under Civic Park, they support anything that gets more cars into the CBD. heaven knows why when they should instead encourage the use of public transport. If there is a lack of parking spaces then new developments must be approved only if additional parking spaces for the public are included.
Posted by Nudge, 17/02/2010 9:23:28 AM, on The Herald
contradictory goals - he wants council to control the price of parking so it stays low, but wants a prviate operator to build this. What operator in their right mind would fund this when they will never be able to get a return on it?
Posted by fista, 17/02/2010 9:53:53 AM, on The Herald
Can't believe this suggestion. How chaotic is it on the corner of Darby and Kings Sts already? Why not research green parking facilities on next overseas junket and replace those decrepit buildings on Hunter St that will never be replaced by commercial buildings. Should we get the opportunity of a cruise ship being based in Newcastle on a regular basis, passengers who will come from not only Newcastle/Hunter region, but Central and North but NW and W NSW
Posted by Jules, 17/02/2010 11:53:02 AM, on The Herald
I would have thought that Civic palk would have been the ideal venue for the new Fast Train to Sydney terminal.
Posted by dontwasteelectrons, 17/02/2010 12:14:25 PM, on The Herald
Tate said "Council controls the price of parking and I favour having low-cost parking." Well why did the Management Report tabled in Council last night complain of David Jones undercutting the NCC price (page 21)
Posted by Bigfeller, 17/02/2010 2:24:08 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
CPA Newcastle Convention 2012
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...