News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Newcastle's East End gets set for development boom 

Newcastle's East End gets set for development boom

19 Sep, 2009 05:00 AM
WHILE debate rages about the revitalisation of Newcastle, the city's east end is experiencing the first signs of revival.

Demolition work started this month for the long-awaited redevelopment of the former Tatts Club building, and earlier this month at the old Terminus Hotel.

It follows a Newcastle City Council decision last month to approve plans to turn two other sites in Watt Street into serviced apartments.

Cafes, restaurants and a wine bar have opened their doors in anticipation of the area's approaching population boom, which will include residents from Mirvac's redevelopment of the Royal Newcastle Hospital site.

Restaurateurs said they also wanted to cash in on a recent Newcastle City Council decision to reopen Hunter Street Mall to traffic and on Renew Newcastle projects.

One of the most recent additions is Sprocket; like Bocados, it has recently applied for a liquor licence.

Co-owner Chelsea Daoust said two main issues stood in the way of the stretch taking off: paid parking and the railway.

"I personally think the rail line should go, how great would it be if it was all just opened up," she said.

"It would obviously hurt us in the long run but it just depends on what replaces it."

The owners of the old Tatts building, Chrysalis Holdings Ptd Ltd, gained approval in 2003 for a nine-storey commercial-residential building with 64 units.

The building, which is next to the Great Northern Hotel, is also known as Surf City.

It is understood they have to start work on the proposed Lotus Apartments before their approval expires.

Newcastle City Council also approved plans last month for a refurbishment and construction next door of 36 serviced apartments, car parking, restaurant and conference rooms.

Work is also under way on demolition of the Wirraway flats on the corner of Watt Street and Shortland Esplanade to make way for a 10-storey apartment building.

The former Terminus Hotel and its neighbour the South British Insurance building on the corner of Scott and Bolton streets will become an eight-level apartment block.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What ? all that is happening with the rail still there?so whats this about the rail being a hinderance to development? The glendale interchange is a more sensible use of money in the shorter term -regardless of the rail staying or going. Oh hornsby hospital is also a needy recipient of government money. The east end seems to be going very well and may be able to contribute to all its real needs in the near future. Maybe hornsby hospital is even worthier than the glendale interchange.
Posted by whatsworthy?, 19/09/2009 9:58:23 AM, on The Herald
Here we have it - Sprocket is one of the closest businesses to Newcastle Railway Station - and they want the rail gone. They understand that the advantages out way the disadvantages. They are not the "greedy developers" who want the land..they are just people from the city who understand the city. The argument that we need the rail for the businesses of Newcastle is just not proven be any fact....no businesses want the rail to stay..
Posted by Time to stop the rot, 19/09/2009 10:42:18 AM, on The Herald
I strongly disagree with Chelsea Daoust a co-owner of Sprokets statement that the rail is one of the main issues holding the strip back, I assume it is located in Hunter Street. She also contradicts herself when she also stated that if it is removed "It would obviously hurt us in the long run but it just depends on what replaces it." If these are her genuine thoughts why did she and her co-owner proceed with their business.
Posted by DavidB, 19/09/2009 11:15:08 AM, on The Herald
Quote from inner city business owner Chelsea Doust, "I personally think the rail line should go, how great would it be if it was all just opened up. It would obviously hurt us in the long run but it just depends on what replaces it". Wow, with great logic like that I'm sure the future of Newcastle is assured by its astute business people.
Posted by Ms., 19/09/2009 1:07:23 PM, on The Herald
Chelsea Daoust is a moron: it's people like her who are wrecking the city precinct, turning into a boring beige apartmentscape, lifeless, locking out all sorts of other people who never wanted to be part of her stupid captive market of rich spoilt idiots. Excessive apartment construction has destroyed Newcastle. The rail line is the only interesting architecture still left. Use it properly and keep it Newcastle: otherwise you will be the laughing stock of the nation.
Posted by Lisa, 19/09/2009 1:11:15 PM, on The Herald
Who are these short sighted fools and greedy property moguls who think the railway should go when the existence of the railway is precisely one of the reasons that the East End is so accessible and valuable for residents and as urban renewal. I too would happily buy a cheap 1 br + studio retirement unit within walking distance of Nobbys Beach, Newcastle Beach, Hunter Street retail, Prince Edward Park, The Foreshore, Honeysuckle, Darby Street and the train to work in Sydney. Take away the train and watch it all just drain away as the bumper to bumper cars take over in a place without parking. Why import the Sydney disease?
Posted by max, 20/09/2009 12:14:33 AM, on The Herald
Do your planning around the rail
Posted by Yeah_Right, 20/09/2009 12:39:01 AM, on The Herald
Its very funny this continued insistence that the rail stands-in-the-way. Yet here is development happening and there is no thought from the spokes person that future clients to the developments may be using rail. Once again it demonstrates that the opposition to the rail is isn't based on any facts or figures just that people don't like rail.
Posted by Jeremy C, 20/09/2009 1:30:39 AM, on The Herald
Is some thing actually happening in Newcastle, any improvement has to be for the better. Along while comeing just hope it don't stop.
Posted by intouch, 20/09/2009 3:59:38 PM, on The Herald
perhaps it's because it is economically unviable, environmentally unsaustainable, and massively underutilised. The rail line is"Interesting architecture"??? Wow, what a rocking time it must be hanging out with you !!
Posted by darryl, 20/09/2009 5:10:23 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
CPA Newcastle Convention 2012
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...