News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 NSW Government considers extending fast tracking for public housing to private sector 

NSW Government considers extending fast tracking for public housing to private sector

09 Feb, 2010 04:00 AM
THE NSW Government will consider extending its controversial fast-track approval system for public housing to include private sector developments.

The idea has outraged Hunter residents who are fighting with Housing NSW over its plans for multi-storey unit complexes in their streets.

Fassifern residents' spokesman Carl Sueli said it could be a recipe for disaster.

"It's incredible. Over the last few months we have pointed out all the flaws of the process," he said.

But developers welcomed the idea yesterday, saying they had been stuck with a "ponderous 1970s planning system" while the public sector had been allowed to go on a "blitzkrieg of planning approvals".

The State Government has self-approved 427 public housing units in the Hunter Region in the past year under the fast-tracking of Federal economic stimulus money.

Urban Taskforce chief executive Aaron Gadiel said the private sector should be able to do the same.

"Newcastle and the Hunter have a very good future with its strong links to mineral resources and there is strong demand for new housing," he said.

"And the greatest proportion of that demand is for private sector housing; people want to own their own homes or rent privately, not from Government."

NSW Premier Kristina Keneally said she would appoint an independent auditor to review the powers being used in NSW to implement the stimulus package.

The reviewer will be asked to "evaluate the benefits and other consequences" of applying the new rules to major transport projects, "significant commercial or even appropriate residential projects" Ms Keneally said.

Lake Macquarie Mayor and independent MP Greg Piper, warned yesterday against shutting councils out of the process.

"I would caution that in time to come, if the stimulus package spending was subjected to a serious audit we would find there's been substantial waste that's come out of it," he said.

"And it's not unique, if people go hell for leather and spend a heck of a lot of money under time stress and artificial deadlines they tend to make mistakes and there are unforeseen consequences."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The councils, councilors and residents only have themselves to blame for the need to fast track developments as time and time again approvals are delayed because of the not in my backyard syndrome.
Posted by thinkitthrough, 9/02/2010 5:02:58 AM, on The Herald
A serious inedepndent inquiry and audit into Govt spending in the Stimulus package would be welcomed. Tax payers' money is being wasted in Swansea. Blocks of land purchased from failed private developers, well above market prices. -$1,165,000 and $980,000. Not to mention the added huge costs of removing all trees and huge build up of land due to being on a flood plain. Both State and Federal Govts have promised accountability for spending and transparency. Building must be halted until such an audit is completed.
Posted by Swanee, 9/02/2010 7:05:51 AM, on The Herald
What a great idea! Why not just do away with all state and local government planning requirements and really speed things along.
Posted by hunter, 9/02/2010 8:00:40 AM, on The Herald
Why is the state government trying to take powers away from local government? Local communities have a right to be protected. The state government already has too much power and really should be taken out of any process that impacts on communities. Public housing should be a local government issue and for local councils to decide where there is a need for public housing and the type of public housing that is required.
Posted by map, 9/02/2010 9:04:53 AM, on The Herald
it's about time new houses were built the waiting list for housing is a disgrace, even the priority waiting list is a sham and not everyone that lives in department of housing are druggo's or drunks, many are families who treat their homes as if they owned them their self so a lot of people out there need to stop running down all people who live in housing commission, you never know some day you all may need one of these homes when the banks repossess your home because you can not afford the payments anymore, anyway let's just hope they build fast and soon because we are still waiting for ours
Posted by micheal brown, 9/02/2010 9:45:38 AM, on The Herald
A balance needs to be made here. The recent Housing NSW developments are not a desirable outcome in many suburbs - whilst they are architect designed, the standards that they acheive for carparking, open space and the number of units on each site is, in many cases, very poor. In many situations the developments have too many units, too few parking spaces and not enough consideration for neighbours' amenity nor that of future occupants. However, the current system of approvals for private developers is slow and costly. The process of getting applications through Council's must improve. We have housing shortages, incresing prices and increasing population - more housing is needed to house everyone suitably. Yet developers will spend months (years) negotiating mundane things with Council planners who seem to think its there job to stand in the way of development, rather than ensuring development is suitable. This drives up house prices for everyone as developers have HUGE holding costs. There needs to be a balance - we dont want crap developments like the dept of housing, but then we shouldn't wait months for approvals of developments because of mundane, irrelevant nonsense.
Posted by IAmAPlanner, 9/02/2010 9:51:50 AM, on The Herald
Soooo many badly designed and executed building projects. And all to be inflicted upon its occupants and neighbours for at least another 25 years. I hope someone sets a legal precedent and sues the state government for negligence in approving these style of outmoded and outdated living arrangements.
Posted by what'shappeningtothiscountry, 9/02/2010 11:33:56 AM, on The Herald
I can't see much difference between this and some of the god-awful developments which have been approved by the council in recent years. Public housing and private housing is badly needed everywhere. If the councils didn't diddle-daddle about so much they would not need to be bypassed in this way.
Posted by Den Isles, 9/02/2010 5:07:37 PM, on The Herald
When you look at the damage High Trade did in this community and their connections with nsw government officials that allowed a construction company with very poor history to continue to operate and flourish, leaving sub contractors out of pockets by millions of dollars. Is this what the nsw people in for. This government likes to change the rules when they don't like the answers.
Posted by map, 9/02/2010 5:25:05 PM, on The Herald
Where is the Tenants Union? Do they not consider the welfare of their members?
Posted by Bigfeller, 9/02/2010 5:42:36 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Should the fast-track planning process used for public housing be extended to private developments?

Yes
(37.3%)

No
(62.7%)

Total Votes: 158
Poll Date: 08 February, 2010

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...