News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Options for Newcastle fig trees considered 

Options for Newcastle fig trees considered

28 Jul, 2010 05:00 AM
A city boulevard could be locked up while Newcastle’s leaders consider whether to spend up to $4.9million dealing with 14 trees believed to pose a public safety risk.

Newcastle City councillors were briefed last night on options for managing trees in Laman Street, Cooks Hill.

The matter has been on the agenda for several months after a council report said 14 figs were failing and should go.

Following several delays, workshops, protests and risk management strategies, 10 options were outlined last night ahead of a report going before the council in August.

Council community planning co-ordinator Ian Rhodes said options ranged from keeping the trees with cables and posts for support, to removing all 14 and planting new species.

Capital costs ranged from $8000 to $4.9million, with recurrent costs of $1000 to $60,000.

Mr Rhodes said the council reviewed risk management strategies now in place, which include banning parking and closing the road when wind speeds of more than 50km/h are forecast.

Indications were that further restrictions were needed to manage the organisation’s duty of care to citizens.

Council infrastructure management services manager John Johnston said this would include installing gates and closing the street at night to stop people parking there after hours. Pedestrian access would be limited.

Mr Johnston said the problem of people ignoring the present restrictions and parking in the street at night had elevated the trees estimated risk ratio from one in 10,000 to one in 400.

This prompted comments of ‘‘balderdash’’ and ‘‘when was the last death?’’ from the public audience.

Protesters outside City Hall last night made their point with placards reading ‘‘Save our figs’’ and ‘‘These trees are living works of art!’’

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Cut the trees, cut the rot, cut our costs, replant and renew. Ignore the idiot fringe. They are killing our city
Posted by Reformer, 28/07/2010 6:36:50 AM, on The Herald
?& Where did the NSW Governor park for several hours while opening the recent curious colony exhibition? Directly under the majestic trees & also under the watchful eye of our civic leaders!
Posted by Treeunion, 28/07/2010 8:27:24 AM, on The Herald
are they joking themselves? where is the decision? just do it. $4.9 million? - ya dreamin'
Posted by judgedredd, 28/07/2010 9:07:25 AM, on The Herald
Just open the street up to normal activity and pay the insurance premium. I suspect there is a greater risk of many of Councils empty and or poorly maintained buildings crashing to the ground. Problem solved for at least 25 years.
Posted by Bigfeller, 28/07/2010 9:55:30 AM, on The Herald
I bet it does not cost $4.9m to remove 14 trees from a mine site or road works.
Posted by Bigfeller, 28/07/2010 10:00:34 AM, on The Herald
keep them you fools newcastle inner city is already painful on the eye to cut these trees down would truly be such a stupid and disapointing decision.
Posted by 99, 28/07/2010 10:27:06 AM, on The Herald
The comment from the gallery is true. There is a much greater probability of being run over by a car then being hit by a falling branch yet no one wants to get rid of cars. The Laman street trees are an icon.
Posted by biffoski, 28/07/2010 10:39:46 AM, on The Herald
I often take my daughters to the City Library at the weekend. My little one is very proud to have her own card, and she really likes to use it. But access to the library is getting harder. Are the trees really more important than the library? Then we should shut the library and the art gallery. Are pedestrians less liable to harm from falling trees than motor vehicles? If safety is the issue, that is the question NCC has to consider.
Posted by skeptic, 28/07/2010 10:51:06 AM, on The Herald
Gates and limiting pedestrian access? This council has LOST it, seriously. It's time for them to go. I walk through there twice a day, I've never seen so much as a fallen branch let alone anything dangerous. This is the most RIDICULOUS waste of council resources I can possibly imagine.
Posted by Selina, 28/07/2010 11:25:27 AM, on The Herald
keep the more healthy trees and incorperate safety measures into them, whilst replacing dangerous trees with new ones to avoid a total loss of the large trees. Staggering planting is what is done all over the world to avoid having all large trees ones day and all small ones the next. And for people whinging remember they all cant live for ever and we cant keep closing streets to stop trees from being cut down.
Posted by light_green, 28/07/2010 11:31:30 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
GIVE A FIG: Laman Street, Cooks Hill.
GIVE A FIG: Laman Street, Cooks Hill.
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Should Laman Street be closed to pedestrians and cars while Newcastle City Council decides what to do about the fig trees?

Yes
(20.9%)

No
(79.1%)

Total Votes: 278
Poll Date: 27 July, 2010

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...