News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Passenger rail fears for loader 

Passenger rail fears for loader

13 Jun, 2011 04:00 AM
PUBLIC transport advocates fear the proposed T4 coal-loader on Kooragang Island will put pressure on passenger rail services on the main northern line.

The T4 loader being planned by the Rio Tinto and Xstrata-backed Port Waratah Coal Services (PWCS) could add another 140million tonnes a year to the Hunter’s export coal capacity.

Although a final size for the loader is yet to be decided, documents lodged with the NSW Department of Planning put an indicative value on the project of $3.5billion.

By comparison, stage one of the recently completed Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group terminal cost about $1billion.

Capacity along the Hunter Valley ‘‘coal chain’’ between the mines and the port is limited by the weakest link in the chain.

The Australian Rail Track Corporation (ARTC) is building a third line between Minimbah, near Singleton, and Maitland, and a second rail bridge onto Kooragang Island is being planned to handle the traffic in and out of T4.

This means the weakest link in the system is likely to be the two coal lines between Maitland and Sandgate unless coal trains can use the two adjacent dedicated passenger lines or unless ARTC builds a third coal line.

While details were not available at the time of writing, an ARTC spokesman said it made sense to maximise use of existing rail lines before incurring the cost of a third line.

But the spokesman emphasised, however, that passenger services retained priority over coal services under the conditions of ARTC’s operating lease.

A PWCS spokesman said various rail options on Kooragang were being considered for T4 but the configuration of lines over the Hunter River from the main northern line was a matter for ARTC.

Public transport advocate Darrell Harris said putting coal trains on passenger lines would put pressure on passenger services.

‘‘Whether they want to acknowledge it or not, passenger numbers on the Hunter rail service have been growing by about 8per cent a year for the past three years and occupying passenger tracks with coal trains makes it harder to cope with further expansion,’’ he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
ARTC are being a little coy - there are many things that can be done to prevent the 'Coal Roads' meeting capacity. The busiest double track section of railway in the world, in China, carries only coal and moves over 400 million tonnes a year.
Posted by Tony Bailey, 13/06/2011 5:05:52 AM, on The Herald
As an outside observer, i think they should replace the passenger trains between Maitland and Newcastle with buses. I use the trains often and they seem a waste, due to the lack of people on them. I have worked out that they can save roughly $200 a day by using the buses as opposed to the trains.
Posted by Alex Cooper, 13/06/2011 7:25:15 AM, on The Herald
Coal is important however it is not the only form of freight that needs to use the line. Passenger trains are also very important and their use will increase. Surely the use of conveyors could be a viable alternative with all stockpiles and blending activities west of Maitland.
Posted by Bigfeller, 13/06/2011 8:41:58 AM, on The Herald
You have to feel for the ARTC, having to future proof what will be a declining industry. I give thermal coal another 20 years, coking a bit longer, yet the rail infrastructure for this dinosaur industry has to cope with the blinkered demands of BHP-Billiton, Rio and PWCS. If they are contributing then at least the ARTC should have them fund a new passenger service line linking Rutherford and Aberglasslyn to the Hunter line.
Posted by pablo, 13/06/2011 10:43:03 AM, on The Herald
@Alex Cooper, what planet are you on? The Newcastle train carries more people into Newcastle than any bus, THE FREE BUS can only attract 130 passengers a day! Buses to Maitland? No way.
Posted by Common Sense, 13/06/2011 2:49:08 PM, on The Herald
You're dreaming Pablo - your great grandkiddies will still be burning dinosaurs to keep the lights on.


Posted by Scott Hillard, 13/06/2011 3:51:27 PM, on The Herald
At Alex Cooper, this is NOT about replacing trains with buses. It is about pressure being put on passenger trains due to a loader.
Posted by N/Flyer, 13/06/2011 7:44:55 PM, on The Herald
Why is it that NSW is happy to see billions invested in coal infrastructure in The Hunter but refuses to invest in passenger services?

Of course we all know the answer to that. Coal returns a profit used to fund services in Sydney. The Hunter has no worth to Macquarie Street other than as a piggy bank to raid for Sydney.

We should be marching in the streets demanding self government.

Posted by Newy, 13/06/2011 8:48:34 PM, on The Herald
@ Alex Cooper - Here's is a good idea next time your on a train from Maitland to Newcastle - have your guide dog count the passengers as obviously you haven't a clue !
Posted by Crazyivan, 13/06/2011 10:29:39 PM, on The Herald
oh to be a piece of coal, travel the world & destroy its soul.
Posted by vera ventolin, 13/06/2011 10:30:00 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
RAILROADED: Transport advocacy groups are concerned coal trains will ties up rail tracks at the expense of passenger trains.
RAILROADED: Transport advocacy groups are concerned coal trains will ties up rail tracks at the expense of passenger trains.

Most popular articles


 
Landcom Sanctuary 190512
 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...