News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Plan to store gas near Tomago aquifer 

Plan to store gas near Tomago aquifer

24 Aug, 2011 04:00 AM
HUNTER Water has expressed concern about a proposed gas storage plant that would lie within the catchment area for the Tomago sandbeds, which help provide drinking water for the Lower Hunter.

AGL has proposed the $300million plant on land off Old Punt Road and has lodged an application with the Department of Planning.

The project includes a processing plant, storage tank for up to 30,000tonnes of liquid natural gas, a receiving station at Hexham to link the project into the state gas network and a pipeline from Hexham to the plant.

In a submission to the project this month, Hunter Water said the development fell within the south-western section of an area that protected the Tomago Aquifer drinking water source. The aquifer supplied 20 to 25per cent of the Lower Hunter’s drinking water.

‘‘ ... new information provided by the applicant indicates that the direction of groundwater flow in the vicinity of this development is directly towards one of the drinking water borelines in the Tomago Aquifer,’’ Hunter Water said in its submission.

The proposed project site was only 500metres upstream.

For that reason, the water authority wanted conditions placed on any project approval including a requirement for a peer-reviewed stormwater management plan, a groundwater monitoring strategy, and a deed of agreement between Hunter Water and the company.

The agreement would relate to the ongoing management of the drinking water aquifer beneath the proposed development.

‘‘Hunter Water considers it a matter of inter-generational equity that should this development proceed it is undertaken with the greatest care and consideration for the groundwater resource and water quality for the region,’’ it said.

The submission also said AGL had acknowledged Hunter Water’s concerns and taken them seriously, proposing a number of design changes to help address the issues.

Some Fullerton Cove residents have raised concerns about potential impacts on the sandbeds, but from Dart Energy’s proposed coal seam gas pilot well project nearby.

Hunter Water has so far said it has no concerns with Dart’s proposal.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This entire proposal should be outright rejected. I believe that coal seam gas extraction is singularly the most destructive mining we have ever embarked upon. The cocktail of literally thousands of chemicals used to frack the seams we know nothing about, or how they affect our most precious resource - water. To locate this plant anywhere, let alone the Tomago sandbeds is sheer lunacy.

Submitted via iPhone App

Posted by Coming Apart at the Seams, 24/08/2011 6:01:53 AM
Now we will see the resolve of the newly elected Liberal Party MPs in New castle.

Will they vote to follow party policy & allow the possible pollution of 25% of Newcastle potable water; or will they represent the voters best interests & both vote against this proposal in Parliament plus direct the bureaucrats to reject this development.


Posted by Machiavelli, 24/08/2011 6:30:46 AM, on The Herald
No industry that may affect our water supply should be allowed anywhere near the aquifer. 1 slip and it is polluted = NO GO
Posted by XFactor, 24/08/2011 7:51:56 AM, on The Herald
not quite up there, but in my opinion this is nearly as smart as building a nuclear power plant next to the ocean on a fault line.
Posted by judgedredd, 24/08/2011 8:04:47 AM, on The Herald
these companies treat people like expendable nuisancess. if we're all expended who will buy their product, or will it all be exported ?
Posted by just a thought, 24/08/2011 9:29:48 AM, on The Herald
After the Orica fiasco, who is going to trust these corporations to do the right thing in regardless of lip service to regulation and how they sweet talk us? Enough industrial pollution risk in this area. Gas storage next to our water catchment is not on.
Posted by Kate, 24/08/2011 11:21:08 AM, on The Herald
Do any of these people sending comments actually read? Where does it say this is coal seam gas - its LNG the stuff is pumped out of the ground in places like the Moomba gas fields in SA - no fracking involved , more ill - informed comment . By the way , do you know how many chemicals are added to your drinking water to make it safe to drink , or do you think it comes out of the dams all clean and sparkly.
Posted by smithy, 24/08/2011 2:35:46 PM, on The Herald
Are these people for real or just really stupid? I have no trust for these organisations.
Posted by Wulf, 24/08/2011 5:15:52 PM, on The Herald
These corporations have a bad record when it comes looking after the environment - the Tomago sandbeds should be absolutely protected at all costs. Neither the csg drilling nor the storage gas plant should go ahead. As Machiavelli said a big test for the new NSW govt. Why do I have little faith?
Posted by not surprised, 24/08/2011 5:49:57 PM, on The Herald
These corporations have a bad record when it comes looking after the environment - the Tomago sandbeds should be absolutely protected at all costs. Neither the csg drilling nor the storage gas plant should go ahead. As Machiavelli said a big test for the new NSW govt. Why do I have little faith?
Posted by not surprised, 24/08/2011 9:31:37 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...