News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Planning powers to return to councils 

Planning powers to return to councils

05 Apr, 2011 04:00 AM
BILLIONS of dollars worth of proposed major Hunter projects will be determined by the NSW Planning Assessment Commission and local councils.

Under a radical shake-up of the controversial assessment process, half of the state's 500 3A applications will be sent to the commission for determination.

A quarter will be sent to the relevant local councils and the remaining quarter, which have been on the books for more than two years, will lapse.

The changes mean Lake Macquarie City Council, rather than the Planning Minister, will determine a project such as the Catherine Hill Bay residential development.

The commission is likely to determine other projects, such as the Hunter gas pipeline.

Premier Barry O'Farrell said no new Part 3A applications for private residential, commercial, retail or coastal development projects would be accepted as from yesterday.

"The days of giving the planning minister sweeping powers to approve developments at the stroke of a pen with virtually no consultation with local communities are over," Mr O'Farrell said.

The changes will have significant implications for the 186 active Part 3A Hunter projects listed on the Department of Planning website.

They range from the $1.3 million Terminal 4 coal-loader project at Kooragang Island and multimillion-dollar mine expansion projects to suburban commercial and residential projects.

Details of the thresholds that will determine whether the Planning Assessment Commission or a local council decide a project are yet to be announced.

Hunter mayors cautiously welcomed the return of the their planning powers but were keen to hear more about how the new system would work.

"We are all supportive of greater transparency in the planning process," Singleton mayor Sue Moore said.

"What we need to know now is which projects will fall into which category."

She said some multimillion-dollar mining projects in the Singleton local government area would remain outside the capacity of the council to determine.

Lake Macquarie mayor Greg Piper also supported the return of local council planning powers but he acknowledged there was a place for a process to deal with projects of state significance such as mines and power stations.

"Lake Macquarie Council has demonstrated it is perfectly capable of assessing major projects," he said. "GPT's Charlestown Square development is an example of that."

Mr O'Farrell also announced a full review of the state's planning legislation, expected to take about 18 months.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
You know, nothings actually changed. The Department of Planning has just pulled the shutters down at their customer service counter. Get back to us when something is legislated.
Posted by fnord, 5/04/2011 12:29:26 PM, on The Herald
I think its a start, we should be supportive whilst keeping one hand on ur back pocket!
Posted by adam, 5/04/2011 2:12:24 PM, on The Herald
Its a shame this late decision has failed so many communities already, with the proposals approved in many communities for housing commission develpments to take place, then go broke and now leave a half finished eyesore in their wake.

Nice work labor, lets hope the up coming government puppets can do a bit better job.

Posted by Disappointed, 5/04/2011 3:49:11 PM, on The Herald
MAKE A CARPARK FOR HAMILTON

TRAIN OE BUS IT INTO TOWN.

MAYBE THE NCC WOULDNT LIKE THIS INCASE IT CUTS THE METER PROFIT DOWN.

ALTHOUGH THEY WILL GET MONEY AS IF ANYONE DRIVES A CAR IN AND DECIDED THEY ARE TO DRUNK TO DRIVE HOME LEAVE IT THERE AND GET IT NEXT DAY.AT IT WOULD BE SAFER THAN ON THE STREET.

THE MALL WOULDNT HAVE CARS DOGGING THE LINES AND THE BALLS.

Posted by Yeah_Right, 5/04/2011 4:12:49 PM, on The Herald
The problem is that since Part 3A was introduced, Council Planners have been deskilled in dealing with these types of applications. Should be interesting times ahead. Why they didn't just pass the decision making process from the Minister to the JRPP's and allow the DoP to keep assessing??
Posted by Planner, 5/04/2011 9:40:30 PM, on The Herald
Where does this leave Cessnock?
Posted by Newy, 6/04/2011 9:06:23 AM, on The Herald
Newy asks where does this leave Cessnock. Answer - They still have their Planning Panel, for the time being. The government has done away with Part 3A which covers the major projects like new mines, major commercial and residential projects at Honeysuckle. The Planning Panel at Cessnock is dealing with their DA's. However watch for the government to announce that it is getting rid of the Planning Panel - they made that comittment before the election.
Posted by Planner, 6/04/2011 11:08:45 AM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
Landcom Sanctuary 190512
 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...