News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Power demand taken up by gas 

Power demand taken up by gas

23 Sep, 2011 04:00 AM
COAL seam gas would play a vital role in meeting the state’s increased demand over the next two decades, Energy Minister Chris Hartcher told a conference in Newcastle yesterday.

NSW electricity use is projected to grow at 1.6per cent per annum, while the peak summer and peak winter demands are forecast to rise by 2per cent over the next decade.

As a result, the Australian Energy Market Operator has estimated 7000megawatts of new peaking gas generation and 700megawatts of new base-load gas generation will be required in the next 20 years.

This would nearly triple the share of gas-fired generation in NSW to 30per cent.

‘‘So we will need three times more gas to fuel these power stations and to supply greater consumption of gas in households and our commercial and industrial sectors,’’ Mr Hartcher told the NSW Coal and Energy Conference.

‘‘Our reliance on importing gas from South Australia and Victoria, where it is reported that natural gas production is projected to decline, must change.’’

But any expansion of the coal seam gas industry would be balanced against the value of the state’s environmental assets.

The government is presently developing an Upper Hunter and New England strategic land use policy, which will include a 10-week consultation phase.

‘‘There are areas yet to be explored, yet to be developed and we need to do that in a consistent and rational way,’’ Mr Hartcher said.

‘‘That does not mean and never could mean that all of NSW is open for mining. We are working to identify those appropriate areas consistent with protection of our water, farmland and environment.’’

A group of about 25 protesters from the environment lobby group Rising Tide rallied outside yesterday’s protest calling for the abandonment of the T4 coal loader project at Kooragang Island and increased investment in renewable energy.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
In a survey of the Gloucester shire population just completed by Gloucester Council I understand more than 80% of residents were against expansion of the coal and coal seam gas mining.

When will the government get the message the people dont want these destructive forms of energy production.

Posted by steve robinson, 23/09/2011 8:00:35 AM, on The Herald
what has Lake Macquarie got in stall & when do you think the 2 Gregs might share the details?
Posted by Ali, 23/09/2011 8:43:19 AM, on The Herald
No Coal!

No Gas!

Solar cant do the job properly!

Can all the do gooders come up with a system that will make our world go round ?

Posted by Gas Man, 23/09/2011 9:44:57 AM, on The Herald
in my opinion, the community does not wan csg mining. what does it take for governments to listen to those they are supposed to represent?
Posted by chameleon, 23/09/2011 9:47:54 AM, on The Herald
I can imagine there will be heaps of experts posting here. What is the alterative?

You don’t want Coal or Gas. Renewable are just too small, unreliable and expensive for massive bulk distribution. Realistically the only alternative is Nuclear but you dont want that either even though Australia will never have a massive earthquake like in Japan.

Wish this green cult would stop wasting everyone’s time and think with a bit more intelligence. Have a look at how small the world’s largest solar farm truly is and how much it cost.

Posted by Taipan, 23/09/2011 10:44:14 AM, on The Herald
Nuclear power for the win.

Clean, green, 24/7 baseload power.


Posted by Scott Hillard, 23/09/2011 11:05:49 AM, on The Herald
Taipan and Gas Man are spot on. Nuclear is the cleanest cheapest form of power but, in my opinion, while the watermelon party (green on the outside and red in the middle) has control of our government it won't happen so coal and gas are the only option.
Posted by TC, 23/09/2011 11:10:22 AM, on The Herald
I agree with Gas Man and Taipan. People don't want coal, they don't want coal seam gas, they don't want wind, they don't want nuclear. Can someone please tell me what else we can use?? Solar technology cannot provide baseload power at present so unless you are prepared to accept some impacts from something, then we should all get used to going back to live in the dark ages.

Yes we do have to protect our environment but we also have to live in it. There has to be a tradeoff somewhere.

Posted by Logical_Thinker, 23/09/2011 11:21:53 AM, on The Herald
It is probable that a large earthquake in The pacific ocean could cause a tsunami to hit the east coast of Australia.

Uranium mining is polluting and the waste is dangerous and expensive to store or dispose.

Posted by realist, 23/09/2011 11:32:32 AM, on The Herald
@ realist

Most Nuclear plants are located inland. The waste is easy to store because Australia is such a stable continent. Mining Uranium ore is no different pollution wise then coal mining, but much less Uranium is mined then coal for same energy benefit. ~833.3 tonnes coal = 1kg Uranium energy density.

Nuclear is actually the safest way to generate power (safer then solar and wind believe it or not). Out of 14500 cumulative reactor years in 32 countries there have been only 3 major incidents. It has 4000 times less deaths then coal. Why we don’t have nuclear power here I don’t know.

Posted by Taipan, 23/09/2011 3:01:45 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
PROTEST: Activists from Rising Tide outside the conference yesterday. Pictures by Darren Pateman.
PROTEST: Activists from Rising Tide outside the conference yesterday. Pictures by Darren Pateman.
Related Coverage
MULTIMEDIA
23 September, 2011

Most popular articles


 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...