News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Protest against gas drilling 

Protest against gas drilling

27 Nov, 2010 12:00 AM
EXPLORATORY drilling off Newcastle could discover enough natural gas to convert all the Hunter's coal-fired power stations to gas, Advent Energy executive director David Breeze said.

Mr Breeze said such a discovery could allow all new baseload power stations in NSW to be gas-fired.

Preliminary studies estimate gas reserves worth $50 billion in the company's offshore petroleum licence area from Newcastle to Wollongong.

Advent Energy, through its subsidiary company Asset Energy, plans to begin drilling in the first half of December.

"This project has the capacity to reduce Australia's carbon emissions by around 16 per cent, which would be a massive reduction," Mr Breeze said.

About 100 people attended a rally outside Newcastle Town Hall yesterday about the NSW government's decision to approve the company's exploratory gas drilling plan 55 kilometres off Newcastle.

The rally coincided with a community consultative meeting the government set up to consider the project.

Rally organiser and Hands Off Our Coast spokeswoman Phillipa Parsons said she approached Mr Breeze and a government official to address the protesters.

"They both refused," Ms Parsons said.

"Community concern about this is huge among people that know about it, but a lot of people don't know about it."

Mr Breeze said he was unable to meet protesters because he had to attend a meeting inside the town hall.

The two sides have tussled over the suitability of gas as an energy source. Ms Parsons said "gas is not a clean, renewable energy source".

Mr Breeze said "renewables could only contribute 20 per cent of total power consumption" and gas was much cleaner than coal.

"We need gas to meet increased energy demand," he said.

Environmentalists are concerned about the potential for an oil spill and damage to the coast and marine life.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
community consultative committees are not working as intended by the ministers guidelines. there are no binding laws and quick power points do not justify community approvals. the communuties deserve to know more and to be allowed to feedback and seek input from the communities they purport to represent.many within the community have no idea of the details risks and benefits of this proposal yet it has been approved!
Posted by tick a box, 27/11/2010 5:55:06 AM, on The Herald
A very dangerous activity with major environmental issues.
Posted by Bigfeller, 27/11/2010 6:07:34 AM, on The Herald
Ms Parsons said "gas is not a clean, renewable energy source".

Again Phillipa...lead the way by turning off your electricity, selling your car and not lighting that gas BBQ again....not likely...!!

I surf in that stretch of ocean most days and would hate to see it ruined, but I am also open minded enough to see that you can't base progress on ideology.

It would be great if we could get 100% clean and renewable energy tomorrow, but that isn't realistic. Great idea, but not realisitic.

Natural gas WILL reduce emissions by siginificant levels. We are not waiting on this technology being developed. It is here now, so it is something we CAN do rather sit around in a group hug and wait for technology to catch up.


Posted by Pete, 27/11/2010 6:48:27 AM, on The Herald
A one hundred people attended the rally, some what of a very small minority one would think. Was the shoe chucker amongst them. But we all know that the minority rule the roost.
Posted by intouch, 27/11/2010 12:49:38 PM, on The Herald
Why protest against something that is a

forward step against emissions that i

would have thought any green thinker

would applaud.

Posted by braggers, 28/11/2010 4:47:36 PM, on The Herald
I've read this news article a couple of times now and can clearly see the long term benefits of the gas field. I believe it's an acceptable risk. We can't get rid of dirty old coal with just a snap of the fingers. Oftimes the wheels of progress grind slowly. I've learnt in life that sometimes we (temporarily) have to accept the lesser of two evils. I've also observed that sometimes in the ranks of environmentalists there are those who become so fixed on an issue that they then can't see the forest for the trees.
Posted by Seven of eight, 28/11/2010 10:53:40 PM, on The Herald
@Seven of eight - Do you consider progress to be the loss of 6 million oysters from Fern Bay because of a MINOR fuel spill from a ship in Newcastle harbour? There will be no oysters for another 3 years. How about the potential loss of thousands of tourism jobs from Port Stephens or the potential loss of the Grey Nurse Shark due to gas drilling and extraction? We are not being told the whole truth here. Why has this development been kept so quiet for so long?
Posted by Zeke, 29/11/2010 4:56:40 PM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
MAKING A POINT: The rally against gas drilling in Newcastle yesterday. - Picture by Peter Stoop
MAKING A POINT: The rally against gas drilling in Newcastle yesterday. - Picture by Peter Stoop

Most popular articles


 
Landcom Sanctuary 190512
 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...