News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Raid on 'protected' ridge 

Raid on 'protected' ridge

27 Sep, 2011 04:00 AM
MINING giant Coal & Allied has applied to remove an Upper Hunter landform originally earmarked for conservation.

Saddleback Ridge is home to endangered animal and plant species and forms a natural buffer between the Mount Thorley Warkworth mine and the village of Bulga.

While the company acknowledges it ‘‘previously stated [the ridge] would not be mined’’, big increases in coal prices have ‘‘fundamentally changed’’ its view of the area.

‘‘It has become economic to mine and, in addition to creating 150 new jobs, this will provide ongoing employment for our existing workforce ... of more than 1300 people,’’ a Coal & Allied spokesman said.

Nearby residents, such as Bulga Milbrodale Progress Association spokesman John Krey, argue the ridge is protected under a 2003 deed of agreement with the then-minister assisting the minister for planning Diane Beamer.

The mine’s consent shows Saddleback Ridge in a non-disturbance area.

The deed of agreement obliged the company to ‘‘conserve and manage’’ and ‘‘permanently protect’’ land in the non-disturbance areas unless, in ‘‘the opinion of the minister’’, the applicant could justify mining on social, economic and environmental grounds.

The Department of Planning is assessing the company’s application.

Mr Krey said that if the work were to be approved, the ridge would ‘‘become a hole in the ground’’.

‘‘We will be completely exposed to an open-cut mine,’’ he said.

Carol Russell, who with Mr Krey recently addressed Singleton Council on the issue, said the ridge should have been rezoned for conservation.

‘‘The 2003 agreement was supposed to be binding,’’ Mrs Russell said.

If approved, the mine’s extension would remove more than 760hectares of woodland and forest which contain endangered ecological communities.

Coal & Allied said the decision to apply to mine the area had not been taken lightly.

The company is working with University of New England researchers to recreate the significant Warkworth Sands woodland at several locations in the Hunter, including one near Merriwa.

“To offset the disturbance of this land we have a much more significant conservation package, which will deliver the long-term protection or rehabilitation of an area more than eight times in size,’’ the Coal & Allied spokesman said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
In my opinion, with the "Carbon Tax" hanging over their heads - the mining industry are trying to expand, to keep the dollars coming in.

We are not the one's using that carbon and we will have to pay - for a very long time, as we sell off the only asset we have left - our minerals etc.

We are losing our identity - our precious nature and our pioneering agricultural background.

All that hard work will be lost forever if the land is not protected.

We need some sensible politics.

Posted by Kurri 'n Rose, 27/09/2011 5:05:17 AM, on The Herald
Reconstructed 'conservation areas' fail to reproduce the natural bush. Just check out the Yarrahappinni 'restored' sand mining site after 35 years.

The optimum solution may be to form the Seventh State so that Novocastrians make the decisions about our local resources & how the mining royalties created in our region are spent providing jobs & infrastructure for our kids.

Posted by Machiavelli, 27/09/2011 5:47:01 AM, on The Herald
This land was to be mined by underground means to protect the surface. Take a look at the 1980 EIS.

I think "Environmental offsets" are plain rubbish. Why take land that was safe from mining thyen claim it "offsets" other land that should not be mined for environmental reasons?

Posted by insider, 27/09/2011 6:18:37 AM, on The Herald
These agreements are becoming worthless, because so many of our elected reps are spinless when it comes down to protecting our natural enviornment. Have a look at the mess on Google Earth, yes the value of coal has gone up but the coal under saddle back is not the last coal on earth. But the natural location is the last barrier between farms and open cut! Edward James
Posted by Edward James, 27/09/2011 7:22:47 AM, on The Herald
It is very important that mines and all projects follow the consent conditions.

If not then the approval should be withdrawn.

Enough is enough.

Posted by Bigfeller, 27/09/2011 7:52:38 AM, on The Herald
Tell 'em their joking!
Posted by littlefella, 27/09/2011 8:34:24 AM, on The Herald
Firstly the company agreed to protecting the land. Just because the price of coal has gone up, I don't think this is not a reason to change.

Diddums for the mega rich coal exporters having to pay a carbon tax. Solution is simple, add it into the price of your product and make them pay the tax for you. Donald Trump reckons they want our ores bad enough they'll pay.

Posted by Nudge, 27/09/2011 8:55:26 AM, on The Herald
Why bother electing Governments when the interests of overseas owned mining companies seem to receive more favourable treatment than the residents of this country? I consider politicians throw caution to the wind with any prospect of increased royalties & we always hear the same tempter about more jobs. Why is our environment and landscape put at risk simply because coal prices are higher? Australians seem nothing but pawns in a game.
Posted by Pawns, 27/09/2011 9:44:16 AM, on The Herald
'Our land abounds in natures gifts of beauty rich & rare'... Mining destruction & failed rehab is just unAustralian!
Posted by Ali, 27/09/2011 9:50:35 AM, on The Herald
Always seems the same ol story. We know we promised to care but that was before we realised we could make lots more money. Our company’s interests must take priority. Whom do our Governments represent? We will see.
Posted by Same Ol Story, 27/09/2011 9:52:44 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
EXPOSED: Progress association spokesman John Krey on his land, with Saddleback Ridge beyond.  –  Picture by Peter Stoop
EXPOSED: Progress association spokesman John Krey on his land, with Saddleback Ridge beyond. – Picture by Peter Stoop
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Should economics determine whether Saddleback Ridge at Bulga is mined for coal?

Yes, export earnings and job security are vital
(19.1%)

No, there are more important things to consider, such as the environment
(80.9%)

Total Votes: 392
Poll Date: 26 September, 2011

Most popular articles


 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...