News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Rail line tempers flare on Newcastle council 

Rail line tempers flare on Newcastle council

22/11/2008 4:00:00 AM
TENSIONS have emerged between Newcastle councillors over a proposed industrial development and the future of the city's rail line.

Differences of opinion have led to a code of conduct complaint regarding the development matter and a public condemnation about agendas on the train corridor.

An application from Templar Tighes Hill to build 42 industrial units in the suburb went before Newcastle City Council on November 4 and was rejected by majority vote.

Neighbouring residents ran a vocal campaign against the plan.

Councillors Brad Luke, Bob Cook, Graham Boyd and Scott Sharpe will seek on Tuesday to have the decision overturned.

Cr Luke and colleague Aaron Buman have also lodged a code of conduct complaint against Cr Michael Osborne, who argued for the application's rejection on the grounds it did not comply with council planning guidelines.

Cr Luke said he believed that, under the council's code of conduct, Cr Osborne should have stated before the matter was determined that he had a friendship with one of the objectors and whether or not that represented a conflict of interest.

Cr Osborne said he did not have a conflict of interest.

He said he did not have a relationship with anyone with a private interest in the proposed development, nor an interest that would conflict with his public duty.

He said he had a friendship with a member of the public who was involved in public advocacy on the matter.

Cr Osborne (Greens) and Cr Luke (Liberal) are also at loggerheads over the council's approach to community debate on whether the State Government should cut the inner-city rail line.

Cr Luke unsuccessfully requested on Tuesday that the council state a position on the rail line as a matter of urgency.

Cr Osborne on Wednesday issued a media release labelling the move as "an outrageous abuse of process" because the matter was not urgent.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This not a council it’s a group of people trying to score points against others and have no interest in the rebuilding of Newcastle. Start acting like a council and work together to get Newcastle CBD back on its feet. Newcastle looks like a ghost town from the Store all the way to the beach. Why are the developers not looking at these areas, there applications would passed without any problems and it would cost half the price of where they want build to build now. The council should start selling the CBD as the place to invest or set up business as the current shops in Hunter Street need to be totally refurbished. Why not target big business in Sydney as it would be a lot cheaper in Newcastle than Sydney to live and operate and during this economical down turn they would be looking into cost cutting so it’s time to act now.
Posted by Robert on 22/11/2008 10:54:20 AM
Did the development application comply with council's planning guidelines ? Do we have appropriate planning guidlines ? The old Post Office-soon to become a night spot-the war monument outside vandalised-and we can't decide what to do with that monument, yet we easily made the decision to build a monument to the late Colonel Sanders on the former Palais Royale site. If the rail line goes, what will happen to Newcastle railway station ? Will it be a McDonald's ? OR Will it be a Subway (with pictures of old trains) ?
Posted by Colin O. on 22/11/2008 11:58:49 AM
Who voted for Bauman and his tribe of railway wreckers? Certainly not the commuters from Upper Hunter or Dungog who rely on rail to Newcastle station unlike Bauman and friends who can afford a car and the luxury of living in Newcastle.
Posted by max on 24/11/2008 1:25:45 AM
Max, as one of Buman's "railway wreckers", i suggest that perhaps you should read the proposal. It is NOT to remove the rail and do nothing else, it is to retain the corridor as a Rapid transit Corridor (RTC) and use it as the spine of an integrated tranport system that connects the entire city, not just a few spots along the rail spur. It improves the current situation where people are limited to stops at wickham, civic, and newcastle, and expands it to many more stops, including up and around our beaches. What is proposed is an improvement to Newcastle, our city. At the very least, it is offering an idea (which at council level is all that can be done as ultimately the rail is a State Govt issue). What are Save Our Rail offering other than the "keep doing what we've always done" approach? That approach sees our city in the condition it's in, and no-one is happy with that scenario. If you want to offer an idea, fire away. If you're lining up to bag someone who is trying to improve the city, then that says more about you than it does about the Buman team.
Posted by mikey on 24/11/2008 12:45:48 PM
This Council is turning out the same way that the last council was acting and I think the Dept of Local Govt should give themanother warning of disbanning the Council if they do not pull together and do what is right for this degrading city of ours. The guys who come to surf from the Upper Hunter the rail is the only way they can get their boards to the surf if they don't own a car. All I see is people trying to do what they think is best and not what it sees as best for the city. Put the rail to a vote people of Newcastle.
Posted by Paccy on 24/11/2008 12:51:35 PM
max, i do agree with you in terms of the cost of getting to newcastle, however transportation is simply a part of having a job so far away. Theidea would be that more effective forms of transpotation would be put into place, for example light rail or a more effective bus system, which would generally be more efficient in getting you to your final destination. i would like to stand up for these councillors as they are doing what they believe is best for the city. many of the councillors are new this year, so you wouldn't have felt the impact they can have on our great city, but i think it could be great and having a non bias council, full of labour and greens is the best thing to happen in Newcastle for a long time. Also, luxery cars are available to these people as they have worked hard to get to the position they are in, you should look at their life stories before casting judgement.
Posted by annon on 24/11/2008 11:03:45 PM
councillors are not provided cars by the ratepayer, luxury car or any other type of car. They are paid an annual fee for their services of approx $22k, and nothing else.
Posted by fista on 25/11/2008 2:03:08 PM
Yet another Ncle city council in turmoil. Whats new. Come on over, live in Lake Macquarie
Posted by intouch on 26/11/2008 12:01:23 AM
Max, the answer to your question is "approx 25% of the voters, which is why his team makes up apporx 25% of the council". Of course it wasn't people for the upper hunter, as they're not in the Newcastle LGA. This is NOT a council decision. All council can do is take a position, and that should be refective of the wishes and best interests of their constituents, not the interests of those living outside the newcastle LGA.
Posted by fista on 28/11/2008 11:22:52 AM
Fista is entirely correct - the councillors first and foremost must look after the interests of their constituents and their ward as they see fit. However, the issue of the rail impacts upon a much wider area of than the LGA. The state government must ensure that the needs of those outside the LGA are considered in this process. My personal belief is that the railway should be placed underground. All the proposals should be completely (and fairly) costed, and the pros and cons from a regional perspective considered. Much of the much vaunted contribution to the wealth of the state from the “Newcastle” region comes from outside the LGA, and it is only proper that regional stakeholders have their views considered by the State Government when the time comes. Rather than concentrating on what is best for the Newcastle LGA, energy might be better spent on focussing on an integrated regional transport solution, and presenting a united regional front to the state government.
Posted by Directeur Sportif on 3/12/2008 12:03:17 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

16/12/2008 | So we now have desperate parents attempting to bribe teachers to get their children into a selective high school. What a sad indictment of our education policies, the holy grail of which is parental choice.
 
 
See the world your way
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...