News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Region's rubbish at recycling 

Region's rubbish at recycling

07 Apr, 2009 04:00 AM
CESSNOCK, Maitland and Lake Macquarie residents are among the worst recyclers in the state, according to NSW Government figures.

The three areas rank in the bottom four of 51 areas from the south coast to the Hunter for household waste recycling rates.

The figures, obtained by the NSW Opposition under freedom of information laws, show Cessnock had the worst recycling rate (13.1 per cent) among those areas in 2007-08, followed by Liverpool (14.4 per cent), Maitland (18.7 per cent) and Lake Macquarie (19.1 per cent).

Newcastle (24.9 per cent) ranked 44th and Port Stephens (55.8 per cent) 12th.

North Sydney and Hunters Hill topped the list with recycling rates of 88 per cent.

Opposition spokesman Chris Hartcher has called on the NSW Government to reward councils for improving recycling rates.

Mr Hartcher said the Government paid councils $2.39 a resident under its waste bonus scheme.

"The payments are calculated purely on population and not on the recycling effort of residents," Mr Hartcher said.

"If we're going to be serious about recycling, we need to provide strong incentives."

The Department of Environment and Climate Change said Mr Hartcher had misunderstood the system.

Department spokeswoman John Dengate said it would be unfair to reward councils based on their recycling rates.

Mr Dengate said councils had to meet certain criteria, which is set higher every year, to receive the money.

"You tend to get small, highly resourced councils doing a better job than larger, more dispersed councils," Mr Dengate said.

"If you've got a council with an average land value of a million dollars, a tremendous rate base and a small geographic area, it will always be a lot easier for them to recycle."

He said larger council areas with semi-rural land faced greater hurdles, such as transport costs.

"We think there's not a lot of difference between the willingness of different residents to recycle, it's more about the geographic and economic factors," he said.

He said councils had different levels of technology, which affected recycling rates.

Mr Dengate said the department would be "ramping up the bar in recycling services that councils have to supply".

"In future, maybe everyone will get close to the Hunters Hill levels," he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
If only 19.1% of Lake Macquarie households are using the VERY EXPENSIVE recycling bin service, every second week, then it must be abandoned immediately.
Posted by Josh, 7/04/2009 5:58:31 AM
An early municipal recycling pioneer, found that its much-lauded recycling program was losing huge amounts of money. It has been found that recycling cost twice as much as disposal. Meanwhile, low demand for the materials meant that much of it was ending up in landfills anyway, despite best intentions.
Posted by Hazard, 7/04/2009 6:47:57 AM
Ask the State government how much money is raised through levies on council's tip fees you would be surprised. Then ask does the Government really want recycling.
Posted by garbage, 7/04/2009 7:18:41 AM
I recycle in many ways. Even clothing. What maybe rubbish to someone its a treasure to another. Green waste bin will be stupis thing to start here in Newcastle as not that many even use the green waste pickups. As long as people use the RECYCLE BIN as recycle and not fill with rubbish I am happy
Posted by Yeah_right, 7/04/2009 9:12:49 AM
recyclable materials that exceed capacity to be dealt with goes to landfill anyway. where is the example of industry etc to do the same. This world is up for profit making, until that changes humans are destined to fail mother nature
Posted by van, 7/04/2009 9:18:41 AM
It only goes to prove our waste services are garbage! Its time to impliment a "user choose system" with Councils offering a range of services at varying charges. Users then select the services they require and pay for the services supplied.
Posted by Bigfeller, 7/04/2009 10:25:04 AM
A large amount of window-dressing involved, can't help suspecting. I dutifully recycle all my stuff though. Overload them, jump up and down. Keep the bastards honest - demand accountability. Where does all this stuff go? Write to your rep, get answers. Go to council meetings and make speeches! Time for the grassroots to get off our backsides. The masters of the universe are tumbling from their high-rises. Grab the initiative while we can!
Posted by Clare, 7/04/2009 10:56:26 AM
Great idea Bigfeller. I do the right thing and sort my household waste. I cover my council garbage costs by taking my scrap steel, cans etc to the metal recyclers. i would certainly like to choose the services I want.
Posted by Recycle it, 7/04/2009 11:00:14 AM
Bigfeller....Isn't our recycle services done by private enterprise (Theiss) a tendered out service? You are basically "rubbishing" a service that is tendered out, and don't you want our green lid waste services to go under private enterprise (tender), but you think the NCC waste service is a problem??? I am puzzled by what you are stating.... But I do have to agree with Yeah_right, bulk green waste pickups would be working at a loss. Council would have a better chance of cutting losses by giving every household a compost bin. That would cost less than a one off payment of $50 for a compost bin without the pick up, dump levy included, we are charged for the bulk green waste & bulk goods pickups, that they are saying is a free service.
Posted by Richard Walters, 7/04/2009 11:25:12 AM
maybe less packaging, and refundable bottles would be a way of generating less rubbish.
Posted by just a thought, 7/04/2009 11:43:07 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...