News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Rescue groups want Rutherford pound animals 

Rescue groups want Rutherford pound animals

08 Oct, 2009 03:00 AM
HUNTER animal rescue groups want the RSPCA's Rutherford pound to do more to save animals from being euthanised.

Hunter Animal Rescue spokeswoman Alisha Forbes said she would like rescue groups to be given the chance to care for and find a new home for animals at the pound.

"We are not generally made aware of animals impounded at RSPCA Rutherford," Ms Forbes said.

Animals that rangers pick up from Lake Macquarie, Newcastle and Maitland go to Rutherford pound.

"It would be good to see RSPCA Rutherford utilise rescue groups where possible," Ms Forbes said.

An RSPCA spokeswoman said rescue groups could adopt animals from its pounds once they had "completed the legislated impound period and only if the animal is suitable for adoption".

Dog Rescue Newcastle founder Sue Barker claimed the RSPCA used a "barbaric" method to euthanise animals.

"They inject a needle into their heart," Mrs Barker said.

An RSPCA spokeswoman said "euthanasia through a heart injection is acceptable", but it was not the RSPCA's standard method.

"Intravenous injection is used for euthanasia," she said.

The Herald reported recently that feral and infant animals would be euthanised within seven days at Rutherford pound, under a Lake Macquarie City Council policy.

Ms Forbes acknowledged that most shelters had "too many animals".

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
How about running a couple of heavily discounted desexing days at the RSPCA. It would be interesting to see if offering really cheap or free desexing could potentially cut thousands of dumpings in the future, and providing huge financial savings of running a packed shelter. I don't see this as taking away work from vets because any vet I've spoken to detests euthanasing a perfectly healthy animal.
Posted by Toughen Up, 8/10/2009 6:44:45 AM, on The Herald
Well well well, seems like we are all having a total mis-conception of the RSPCA! I can't believe they do not invite Rescue Group to help save more animals, this is terrible and very sad! So they are more than happy to get our money to supposedly "save unwanted animals" but instead euthanise them and probably keep the cash for "better" things. I'm hoping this is only Rutherford and not Australia wide. Go Hunter Animal rescue and Dog rescue Newcastle! You obviously care for the animals more than the RSPCA. My funding will personnally be changing side now! RSPCA doesn't need it if they can't even do what they are supposed to. I'm sure our local rescues can do with it though! And i agree with "thoughen up" above - How about the RSPCA offer free desexing to at least the female dogs in the local community - this will save a lot of unwanted litters!
Posted by Go rescue, 8/10/2009 10:40:47 AM, on The Herald
infant animal means a very young puppy or kitten right? How can the RSPCA not give those young pups or kitties a chance by even considering letting them go to a rescue group who can take care of them. This is horrible! Are those RSPCA representatives actually human. What is the whole point of running a shelter if you don't even try! This is devastating and shame on the RSPCA. Living in Newcastle i will know what to do next time i find a dumped litter of puppy or kitten. I will call Rescue groups instead of RSPCA. Otherwise they will have a pretty terrible fate!
Posted by Addy, 8/10/2009 10:53:30 AM, on The Herald
Doesn't the RSPCA stand for "Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals" Do they actually try to "prevent" unwanted dogs in the community? Obviously yes by using "Cruelty"!!!! Anyway, i reckon the general public should really consider adopting a rescue dog instead of a pet shop puppies who most of the time come from a backyard breeder and end up in the end of irresponsible owners and eventually euthanised by the RSPCA!!! And I believe that "Go rescue" had a pretty good idea there: how about free desexing to all female dogs.
Posted by Azza babe, 8/10/2009 11:06:49 AM, on The Herald
Go Rescue and Addy, I think you look at this from a different angle. Hunter Animal Rescue representative said they're "not generally made aware of animals impounded at Rutherford". That's one of those airy fairy comments that doesn't really say anything. Does it say Rutherford RSPCA refuse to allow Hunter Animal Rescue's help? Does it say Hunter Animal Rescue have ever contacted Rutherford RSPCA to try to do something about it? Does it say Rutherford RSPCA just go round killing animals without trying to find them homes? One can speculate. However, it's not the RSPCA's fault pet owners are irresponsible. No one likes the thought of helpless animals being euthenased, but if no one puts their hand up to adopt them, then what more can they do?
Posted by She, 8/10/2009 11:20:06 AM, on The Herald
The best thing any prospective animal owner could do is boycott backyard breeders and petshops. Get your next pet from a rescue group and don't give the breeders and petshops the opportunity to make money from over breeding. Be a responsible pet owner including not expecting free desexing, if you can't afford good food, good shelter, time to spend with your pet or pay for vet bills then don't get a pet. Simple!
Posted by idealworld, 8/10/2009 11:27:53 AM, on The Herald
Looks like the RSPCA has been caught out
Posted by Bob.G, 8/10/2009 11:38:03 AM, on The Herald
True ...desexing can be from $50.00 if male up to $200.00 if female and if in season will cost more. If they are desexed the fees to council are cheaper if you have a pension they are cheaper. If your cat hasnt been Microchipped and is found it can be PUT TO DEATH. doesnt have a choice and the owner will NOT know where their pet is
Posted by Concerned Resident, 8/10/2009 11:40:21 AM, on The Herald
"She" from this article it really seems that Rescue group aren't contacted at all (or am i mis-reading it!). I believe that the real problem here is as you said Irresponsible owners and it is clearly not the RSPCA's fault. However if there was more prevention then we probably would have less action.
Posted by Addy, 8/10/2009 12:51:08 PM, on The Herald
These groups seem to be unfairly lambasting the RSPCA - the key is the animals have to be suitable for adoption. There is not much point placing an animal with a family if it has serious health or behavioural problems. My concern would be that these so called “rescue” groups will actually place animals inappropriately with unwitting members of the public. They also seem to be liberal with the facts about the method of euthanasia in order to pin the RSPCA in bad light. And from today’s paper the group who plan to trap cats on Stockton breakwall and rehabilitate them are dreaming –most of them are feral, and will remain that way.
Posted by Richard P, 8/10/2009 12:57:26 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
UNDER THREAT: Animal Rescue carer Belinda Roals with Diamond, an unwanted pup.- Picture by Jonathan Carroll
UNDER THREAT: Animal Rescue carer Belinda Roals with Diamond, an unwanted pup.- Picture by Jonathan Carroll

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...