News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Residents list their concerns to Premier Rees in Maitland 

Residents list their concerns to Premier Rees in Maitland

14 Aug, 2009 10:42 AM
EDUCATION services, the economy and community spirit were strong in the Hunter, but the mining industry's dominance, strain on the health system and the faster provision of infrastructure were the concerns residents say they want the State Government to tackle.

A meeting of more than 150 people at the Maitland Town Hall last night was told Premier Nathan Rees would do his best to address their problems.

The meeting was the fifth of 17 consultation sessions to be held across the state as part of efforts to "refresh" the State Plan, which was unveiled in 2006 and which sets a range of performance targets for delivery of services such as health.

"No doubt there will be some issues of great concern as there have been at community cabinets in the past, but I want the fingerprints of the people of the Hunter all over the new State Plan," Mr Rees said ahead of the meeting.

About 40 Tillegra Dam protesters, Save Our Rail members, Jail officers and NSW Nurses' Association representatives, waved banners outside the building, but inside the atmosphere was far more sedate than that of the last meeting Mr Rees attended in the Hunter.

At that, a community cabinet session in May at Warners Bay, Mr Rees was jeered by protesters and condemned by Orkopoulos whistleblower Gillian Sneddon for her treatment by the ALP.

Mr Rees said ahead of yesterday's meeting that he wanted to hear from local people, rather than interest groups, who tended to "hijack" meetings, or "people like the Mayor" [Peter Blackmore] who already had a forum to air their views.

However, yesterday's attendees included public servants, civic and business leaders, as well as residents and community group representatives, who were asked to list what they saw as areas of strong performance for the Government and priorities for improvement.

Common concerns were poor access to general practitioners, strain on hospitals, concerns about a lack of infrastructure, the need for better public transport and more frontline staff, such as police, and the increasing dominance of the mining industry in the region.

The economy's diversification, the Government's bid to reduce alcohol-related assaults, and education services were among the positives.

The feedback would be included in the draft State Plan, which the Government would outline when it returned to Maitland in October, Mr Rees said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Perhaps Mr Rees should be reminded that it is "interest groups" that force governments to move forward. And "interest groups" are now calling for his resignation. His long apprenticeship in the Labor Party learning how to hate will soon be over. Unfortunately much of the trail of damage he is leaving behind will be irrepairable.
Posted by George, 14/08/2009 8:13:25 AM, on The Herald
Did anyone ask Premier Rees whether he had done anything for Gillian Sneddon since she confronted him at the Warners Bay meeting? He was told by me that Mr Terenzini had had before him the evidence the Premier insisted Gillian take to the "proper authorities" for twelve months with no result. Tuesday saw the winding up meeting for his committee and, as Joanne McCarthy pointed out Gillian was ignored yet again. Our Premier can meet with Indian students when they complain of being wrongfully treated, but a good citizen, loyal long time ALP member and servant can continue to swing in the wind when she might reveal more than the Government wants the voters to know!
Posted by Linda Michalak, 14/08/2009 8:38:03 AM, on The Herald
Hang on a minute - aren't people in interest groups local people? Surely Rees isn't suggesting that people shouldn't get active on political issues they care about ?
Posted by hopeleft, 14/08/2009 10:46:15 AM, on The Herald
the only problem here is that Nathen is not working with Gillian as a member of his government -people like her are what a government needs as their representative. But -its important to realise that talking and meeting all the electorate -as he is must be of some comfort to everyone. breaking down the wall blocking access - so everyone can feel that they are not isolated from those that are there to represent them is gaining my respect
Posted by vote4gillian, 14/08/2009 11:48:19 AM, on The Herald
Hopeleft, these interest groups contradict his position on alot of things so as a typical arrogant labor leader, they don't matter. Same as anyone north of the Hawksberry, we don't matter, and as soon as Newcastle voters realise the Labor Party doesn't care about anything north of the Hawksberry, we can vote the sitting MP's out and get some action around town.
Posted by Nafe, 14/08/2009 11:52:02 AM, on The Herald
In our interest group we are all locals of Gloucester.We formed to stop the mining for coal around our town and farms. The people who get what they want without having to form an interest group are the owners and shareholders of the mines... they are not locals. In fact most come from other countries. How do they get your attention Mr Rees?
Posted by gloucester RIP, 14/08/2009 1:14:15 PM, on The Herald
Am I an interest group if I don't want my children made ill by the State Government approving open cut mining too close to residential areas?(Gloucester is next) What is more important Mr Rees: the cash or our kids?
Posted by noTomorrow, 14/08/2009 1:57:27 PM, on The Herald
Mr Rees, one day you may have children and you will fight tooth and nail to provide them the best that life can offer. That is all the interest groups are fighting for; a better future for our children and grandchildren. So you don't like democracy, how arrogant.
Posted by Aussie, 14/08/2009 8:57:57 PM, on The Herald
Sorry, but is Mr REES suggesting that the interest groups that bothered turning up are not "locals". Can you get anymore local than Cessnock Prison guards, Hunter residents against Tillegra Dam, and people who realised Train is the way to go - not more cars. REES is just too lame to give believable answers or solutions to the protesters.
Posted by Anti-REES, 14/08/2009 9:35:30 PM, on The Herald
Give him a break. Obviously the Premier is keen for individual residents to get a chance to have their say rather than these forums being dominated by well-organised and sometimes well-funded interest groups. These groups have their place but they also generally have ways of accessing government that the little guy does not.
Posted by Kate, 17/08/2009 9:46:54 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...