News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Residents see red over wind project 

Residents see red over wind project

10 Feb, 2010 12:00 AM
bed and breakfast is next door to the development, said it would tower above his business and was in a wildlife corridor.

"People come here for the peace and quiet, you can imagine what this will do," he said.

Project manager for the energy park, Mark Sydney of Pamada Pty Ltd, said he felt there was strong community support.

"Obviously certain people have genuine beliefs about things they don't like, but overwhelmingly the community has been in favour of it," he said.

"We need to do these things to combat global climate change issues."

The Hunter Thoroughbred Breeders Association had repeatedly warned the NSW Government against putting a wind farm so close to horse studs.

Committee member Michael Thew, of Crowingstone, said the development would have a negative impact on those around it.

"It's crap," Mr Thew said. "It's a wind farm with some add-ons. If it was all solar I would be out there helping them build it."

Hunter Landscape Guardians president Carmelle Lymbery, described the decision as devastating.

"We spent three years fighting this, we're Scone residents and it's going to be in our backyard," she said.

NSW Planning Minister Tony Kelly said Pamada had scaled back its proposal, removing 13 wind turbines from the initial plan.

Mr Kelly said 67 conditions were placed on the approval to limit its noise and visual impact and to minimise risks to local bird and bat species.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Maybe the other 13 wind turbines can be installed in the park at Singleton?
Posted by thinitthrough, 10/02/2010 3:00:13 AM, on The Herald
What do you want Scone Residents? More fallout from increased powerstations or the solar/wind power I say shut down all the studd farms in Scone that you all support. They perpetuate the gambling disease that drains the life from tens of thousands families across the country.
Posted by PJ, 10/02/2010 11:45:01 AM, on The Herald
Just not the right place to situate these turbines. The peace and quiet will no longer exist. This is a big country, why must they be built in or near residential communities.
Posted by intouch, 10/02/2010 1:23:57 PM, on The Herald
I'm not against renewable sources of energy as such, but there are significant issues. There are noise issues, aesthetic issues and environmental issues (coal fired power plants are not the only ones with environmental issues). I once heard someone describe living near a wind farm as like having a washing machine going in the next room 24/7. Rows of wind turbines are a blight on the landscape. And there is no getting around the fact that they are inefficient. They only work when there is wind and they are expensive. The energy output is poor compared to the costs to produce that energy. People don't often realise that most of the cost of everything that we consume is in the cost of the energy to produce it and energy is no different so the net energy yield is very poor compared to coal. They are definitely not the answer to all our problems and they create more problems of their own. I can understand the Scone residents not wanting it in their town. I wouldn't want it in mine either.
Posted by RIP_Newy, 11/02/2010 8:01:18 AM, on The Herald
RIP_Newy - Go onto Kooragang Island and stop by the big turbine. Where's the noise? As to the costs to produce wind power? What costs? I'd say it costs much, much more to build a big coal fired plant, and it costs us ALL with the BILLIONS in taxpayer dollars going to the coal producers in subsidies.
Posted by Zeke, 11/02/2010 2:07:20 PM, on The Herald
If you site "aesthetic issues" as an argument against windfarms, you will forever be a part of the problem, and never a part of the solution.. Dear Pamada Pty Ltd, I live in Charlestown, please build in my suburb (if you can find the land space) because an eyesore is a small price to pay for a cleaner future for generations to come. This Not-In-My-Backyard attitude has to stop.
Posted by exacerbated, 11/02/2010 2:43:10 PM, on The Herald
Zeke - one turbine does not constitute a wind farm.
Posted by RIP_Newy, 12/02/2010 6:43:20 AM, on The Herald
Zeke - so will you be building your home on Kooragang next to the turbine? And what do you mean "what costs"? Each turbine can cost up to $6m and the energy that they produce is unreliable - the wind has to blow. The turbines also have to be serviced and maintained - they aren't set and forget. If it was that cheap, efficient and reliable coal fired power stations could not compete. Yet it is wind that cannot compete with coal. Exacerbated - everyone has every right to say "not in my backyard". Wind farms are not a seriously viable energy alternative. They are an expensive boutique option. Since nuclear is not on the agenda, coal remains the only viable option for mains electricity production in Australia.
Posted by not in my backyard, 12/02/2010 1:00:12 PM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB44 plans 12%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 6%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 2%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 2%
5) Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press

Travelworld_See the World
 
School Newspaper Competition


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...