News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Scone horse breeders buck at wind turbines 

Scone horse breeders buck at wind turbines

03 Nov, 2009 04:00 AM
HORSE breeders say wind turbines will ruin Scone's beauty and potentially affect livestock worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

A NSW Upper House committee holding a Parliamentary inquiry into the costs and benefits of rural wind farms was told yesterday that wind farms had the potential to produce at least 20 per cent of the nation's electricity.

Dr Mark Diesendorf, the deputy director of the Institute of Environmental Studies at the University of NSW, said yesterday that wind power was the cheapest of the non-hydro sources of renewable energy.

"It can substitute for some coal-fired power stations," he said.

"It can contribute at least 20 per cent of Australia's electricity and it can create thousands of new jobs, not so much in the operation, but in the manufacture of components."

However, the committee has also heard passionate objections from the Hunter Thoroughbred Breeders Association.

Michael Thew, who owns broodmare farm CrowningStone near Mount Moobi plateau, told the committee at an earlier sitting that his house was about four kilometres from a proposed turbine and he would have an "uninterrupted visual invasion of between five and 31 turbines".

The NSW Department of Planning is assessing plans for 42 wind turbines with a total generating capacity of up to 126 megawatts at an "energy park" at Scone.

Mr Thew said Scone Racecourse had a lot to lose.

"It is currently one of the most picturesque racetracks in Australia [and it] will have on its western vista the full array of up to 31 turbines on Mountain Station," Mr Thew said.

He also expressed concern about the impact on horses due to their sensitive hearing.

He was asked to estimate the value of livestock that may be affected, to which he replied about $500 million or $600 million.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
i once regularly rode my horse along the electricity transmission lines. & yes my horse was also sensitive to the transmitting electricity buzz. but seriously what's worse, wind turbines or coal dust and all the evils that come with it. i imagine horses are also subject to negative effects from increased temparuture and heat stress.
Posted by race horse, 3/11/2009 7:07:03 AM
views versus climate change - a no-brainer Mr Thew!
Posted by ml, 3/11/2009 7:07:42 AM
Thoroughbred breeders waste thousands upon thousands of acres of prime agricultural land to feed animals that do nothing but run around in circles. Compare that to the value of a cheap, sustainable energy that doesn't pollute our atmosphere. People need to get some perspective on what's important.
Posted by Ron Van egmond, 3/11/2009 8:31:47 AM
a few wind turbines is nothing compared to the massive scar on the landscape caused by an open cut coal mine
Posted by snodgrass, 3/11/2009 8:33:27 AM
I actually don't mind the look of wind turbines in the landscape. Much prefer that the the ugly gashes left by coal mining. The Hunter should be embracing these kind of opportunities to expand and broaden our economic base. Our leaders should get behind the Hunter being a hub for renewable energy in this country, considering the current heavy reliance we have on fossil fuels.
Posted by kuni, 3/11/2009 12:22:03 PM
You're right snodgrass but why add another pollutant to a reasonable environment. Widmills went out in Australia in the 1950 s after we got the snowy system up and running. Why go back to a very costly and polluting energy producer. Wind turbine are not as CO2 friendly as the uninitiated may like to have us believe. Not that CO2 is a problem ; it isn't, but politicians need to take note of such things so they can be politically correct.
Posted by GeorgeJ, 3/11/2009 2:14:27 PM
ml. Sadly , these proposed turbines will have the same effect on climate change as all the other turbines around the world. NIL! CO2 will never be a greenhouse gas except in AlGore's flawed estimation. The only real alternative to fossil fuel and hydro power production is Nuclear . Every civilised and scientifically advanced nation in the world uses nuclear production for significant amounts of their electricity production. Australia is still truly a FOSSIL FOOL country. Now we want o screw things up with wind turbines????
Posted by GeorgeJ, 3/11/2009 2:23:24 PM
Hi racehorse. Are you saying that because we already have polluted one area its OK to go ahead and damage another?? Is that logical??
Posted by GeorgeJ, 3/11/2009 2:26:10 PM
So, who should we believe on the issue of global warming due to manmade CO2? The IPCC and all its climate scientists, or the unsupported statements of the flat-earthers such as GeorgeJ? A no-brainer really.
Posted by Zeke, 4/11/2009 10:30:27 AM
So, who should we believe on the issue of global warming due to manmade CO2? The IPCC and all its climate scientists, or the unsupported statements of the flat-earthers such as GeorgeJ? A no-brainer really.
Posted by Zeke, 4/11/2009 10:30:49 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Hamilton St Patricks Day
 
Hunter Water_Leaking
 
 
Travelworld_See the World
 
Scholarships
 
Kloster No 1. Car Sale
 
School Newspaper Competition
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...