News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Sick system: patients forced to travel hours for treatment 

Sick system: patients forced to travel hours for treatment

16 Aug, 2010 05:00 AM
UPPER Hunter residents are travelling hundreds of kilometres to undergo dialysis while machines that could treat them in Muswellbrook and Singleton are used for just three days a week.

A lack of trained staff to operate the Upper Hunter equipment full time is said to be forcing patients to go to Newcastle or Tamworth for treatment.

The journeys come on top of the five hours it takes for dialysis, which patients require three times a week to clean their blood in place of kidney function.

The demand for dialysis is expected to become more acute as diabetes cases in the region continue to increase, leading to more people with kidney disease.

Muswellbrook's dialysis unit has three dialysis chairs, enabling it to treat three people, while Singleton has four. The chairs at both centres are only used three times a week.

Hunter New England Health said it had two Upper Hunter residents on the waiting list for dialysis at Muswellbrook and three at Singleton.

Renal stream co-ordinator and nurse manager of community dialysis services Kelly Adams said that as soon as positions became available, these patients would be reviewed for treatment locally.

But the figures suggest those waiting could be treated closer to home if the Muswellbrook and Singleton units operated another three days a week.

Upper Hunter MP George Souris said he had been astonished to learn the area's dialysis equipment wasn't operated full time, and considered it the top health issue in the area.

"It's really a dreadful situation," he said.

"It's all of your day to drive [to Newcastle or Tamworth] and undergo dialysis, when the machines are right there at home."

Mr Souris said he had raised the matter with the area health service and had been told it was a matter of funding and staffing.

"These are two growing towns and you would think it would warrant the investment," Mr Souris said.

Hunter Rural Division of General Practice chief executive Alison Crocker said the need to travel to access services would add to the difficulties facing dialysis patients.

"Patients who are travelling from regional areas may not have the same support base available that they would have if they were being treated closer to home," she said. "It would also be fatiguing."

Ms Adams said the majority of patients in the Upper Hunter who required dialysis treatment administered their own at home.

"Hunter New England Health is aware that there has been a recent increase in demand for dialysis treatment in the Upper Hunter and we are currently looking at ways to meet the current needs," she said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Well might Hunter New England Health say that they are looking at the situation. They must not only be looking at it, they must be doing something about this situation.
Posted by Henk Luf, 16/08/2010 7:20:59 AM, on The Herald
They are not the only patients with health problems that have to travel long distances. Anyone with any issue that requires regular treatment is in the same position. But I guess when we die from our ailments we cannot vote so we do not matter. Rural people ARE second class citizens, make no mistake about it. Those in the health system helping rural patients deserve a very loud cheer indeed. As for "astonished" politicians, well do your job. 20 years should be long enough to find out what is going on.
Posted by Country Patient, 16/08/2010 8:08:32 AM, on The Herald
Yet if this man was a piece of coal he would have a clear passage all the way to the coast & beyond, with a constant dedicated transport route provided to him there & back.
Posted by Priorities, 16/08/2010 11:05:28 AM, on The Herald
Try living in the north of the state. They travel to places like Toowoomba for decent medical treatment. HNE Health is not servicing the whole of their area only Newcastle. In the north of the state you keep paying private health insurance even if you can't afford it so they you can get some decent medical treatment.
Posted by leolog, 16/08/2010 11:54:01 AM, on The Herald
@ leolog and country patient. NSW is not providing adequately for anyone. JHH is over stretched and the people of the bush are under-serviced. A new state would give us our own cheque book and we would be able to make our own decisions about provision of infrastructure and services. Macquarie Street is failing EVERYONE in the north. New England for the 7th state please!
Posted by Newy, 16/08/2010 1:17:59 PM, on The Herald
Again, the fallacy of composition - "what is good for the micro isn't good for the macro" - muswellbrook saves, but on the whole, we all lose. But this isn't limited to dialysis - almost everything in the health system suffers this problem. We don't give GP enough money to treat patients, so there is a gap (which the patient has to pay). This leads to patients not going to GPs, getting sicker, and ending up in hospital. The old saying "A stitch in time saves nine". We make people pay for medicine, so they don't buy them and take them, then get sicker, and end up in hospital (maybe even facing surgery, eg bypass, because they can't afford the lipid drugs). We don't have enough staff in emerency wards (saves the hospital money) and we have ambulances waiting (costing the ambulance service money). The fallacy of composition - we need to get someone looking at the BIG picture, and making the right decisions for the WHOLE not the small part of the equation (dialysis, drugs, emergency ward), only then will we get the right decisions made.
Posted by Fallacy of Composition, 16/08/2010 3:02:14 PM, on The Herald
Rural people ARE NOT treated as second class citizens, their lifestyle choices are subsidised by the rest of us. It has always and will always be this way. If you choose to live in a rural area you cannot expect the same services as in the capital cities. Health service's have limited budgets and staff. Keeping the specialist services in the cities and regional centres allows them to stretch the health dollar firther - to the benefit of all NSW taxpayers.
Posted by Nigel, 16/08/2010 4:56:27 PM, on The Herald
Looks like this one will have to wait till March 2011 to solve, unless the Governer steps in and dissolves the Govt sooner. Meanwhile, don't get sick or injured.
Posted by Agrophobia Rules, 16/08/2010 6:10:02 PM, on The Herald
Nigel that it total rubbish! Regional people subsidize city people not the other way around. All Australians pay the same taxes yet infrastructure and services are only delivered in the big cities. It is an imbalance which has to change or we will keep losing people to the cities and the cities will continue to groan under the weight of population pressures.
Posted by Nobbys Head, 16/08/2010 11:47:02 PM, on The Herald
Ah yes, poor Nigel. I think Nigel needs to be aware of the fact that, if rural people had not made the said lifestyle choice as he indicates, then Nigel would now be eating grass instead of the fresh fruit and vegetables that he now enjoys. Proper healthcare is a right for all, not just for the chosen few.
Posted by Henk Luf, 17/08/2010 3:22:15 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Dennis Bridge, who has to travel to Newcastle for dialysis because of insufficient staff in his home town of Muswellbrook.
Dennis Bridge, who has to travel to Newcastle for dialysis because of insufficient staff in his home town of Muswellbrook.

Most popular articles


Bounce
 
 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...