News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 State nod for third Hunter coal track 

State nod for third Hunter coal track

12 Jan, 2011 03:00 AM
THE state government has approved a $210 million third rail track from Maitland to Minimbah despite concerns about the noise impacts of more coal trains on existing and proposed housing in burgeoning suburbs.

The federal government will now assess the Australian Rail Track Corporation's 30 kilometre project following the announcement yesterday of NSW Planning Minister Tony Kelly's approval.

That imposed 69 conditions on the project, including the need to draw up a noise management plan and undertake noise and vibration audits.

It followed advice from the Planning Department that the project could go ahead with measures in place to mitigate the impacts on areas such as Rutherford, Farley and Lochinvar.

It concluded the track, expected to boost capacity from 95 million tonnes of coal a year to up to 200 million tonnes, was vital infrastructure and in the public's interest.

Some residents and developers had criticised the project.

Submissions were made about the potential effect on the McCloy Group's $180 million Heritage Green 450-lot subdivision planned for Rutherford, the Anvil Creek development at Greta of 1364 housing lots, a golf course and tourist precinct, Hardie Taree's plans for a motel and tourism development near Singleton and the Farley Landowners Group's for up to 1500 residential lots on 140 hectares.

In response, the corporation altered its plans to place the new track closer to existing tracks and to build it in two phases.

The department acknowledged the implications for land use planning would need to be carefully considered by it and councils, including any impact on the proposed town Huntlee.

Corporation spokesman Brian Dale said it had hoped to start work in late 2010, but the delay in gaining state approval was short.

It was difficult to say when construction may begin while federal approval was sought, he said.

New England Highway congestion would worsen during the work, with hundreds of trucks and cars a day to travel to worksites for the third track and the 40 kilometre Hunter Expressway that is being built at the same time.

The RTA said a traffic management plan must be drawn up.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
what the coal industry wants, the coal industry gets. the govt is not in charge anymore, it is big business that is running the country
Posted by judgedredd, 12/01/2011 6:36:42 AM, on The Herald
Coal trains are much cleaner and quieter now than in the past and this trend should continue.

The coal dust from the trains is now the big issue to be solved and the approval conditions should include a requirement for compulsory veneering or load covering.

Air quality monitors along the track should also be a consent condition.

Posted by Bigfeller, 12/01/2011 7:05:50 AM, on The Herald
Another example of the power of almighty coal! When will it stop? Sure, people decide to live near the railtracks, but they never ever considered that they would pump so many coal trains through!

What will ARTC do to minimise noise as coal trains thunder up and down one after the other?

Posted by U R Kidding, 12/01/2011 7:22:41 AM, on The Herald
Proposed developments should not be whinging about noise they're is already 2 tracks there so they should know that their will be noise
Posted by luke, 12/01/2011 7:24:49 AM, on The Herald
Federal approval for this expansion of coal transport should hinge on coal profits building passenger rail to suit developments. Where is the station for Rutherford passengers? There isn't one and Maitland central is the nearest stop. Expanding passenger access beyond Maitland might then justify more daily trains to Singleton as the locals have requested.
Posted by pablo, 12/01/2011 8:24:40 AM, on The Herald
Better coal train than coal trucks. I grew up in a town where the coal trucks would rumble through day and night. Not only noisy but very dangerous. If we are going to be moving coal to Newcastle then rail is the best option.
Posted by Macca, 12/01/2011 8:46:50 AM, on The Herald
local politicians can bleat about how many jobs are won for the Hunter for this construction (650 temporary) but ignore the fact that billions in mining royalties are being funnelled to pay for infrastructure in seats in Western Sydney - it's time the Hunter split from Macquarie Street and managed our own affairs
Posted by snodgrass, 12/01/2011 9:41:42 AM, on The Herald
Typical government hypocrisy, carping on about the evils of household carbon emissions while actively increasing the consumption of coal
Posted by Gazza, 12/01/2011 11:04:42 AM, on The Herald
Any approval should come with a commitment to a new station for the Huntlee project
Posted by whizzz, 12/01/2011 11:28:44 AM, on The Herald
this might be a bit off track, but is it impossible to share the rail corridor with Kooragang's coal loader and extend it a few km to the airport?
Posted by mat, 12/01/2011 1:13:15 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...