News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 State offside in Knights versus Jets stadium row 

State offside in Knights versus Jets stadium row

13 Feb, 2010 04:00 AM
THE State Government's hands were tied on the stoush between the Knights and the Jets before an independent ruling was made on its own dispute with the rugby league club over EnergyAustralia stadium, Hunter Minister Jodi McKay said.

Commenting on the Knights' legal action to recover more than $300,000 the Jets allegedly owed for hiring the stadium, Ms McKay said the community could "make up its own mind" whether the Knights were being hypocritical, given they owed more than $1 million in stadium rent to the Government.

Knights chief executive Steve Burraston sought this week to keep the latest dispute with the Jets separate from the club's decision to withhold the rent and seek government compensation for site redevelopment work.

But the NSW Opposition said the "mess" was the result of the Government's inability to negotiate an agreement over the stadium that satisfied both clubs.

The Knights are the major tenants of the government-owned stadium and sub-let it to the Jets.

An independent arbitrator would hear the rent dispute between the Government's Hunter Venues authority and the Knights next month.

Ms McKay, who previously said the two clubs were "behaving like children" and the Jets were treated unfairly, said yesterday she could not comment before the hearing, but that a decision about the rent was needed "before we can move forward and consider other issues", such as the Jets' access.

Opposition spokesman for the Hunter Mike Gallacher said Ms McKay had promised to sort out the stadium dispute more than 18 months ago, but had failed to deliver.

The Knights were feeling the squeeze, and had been "forced into a situation" of scrounging back the money from the Jets, he said.

He said the Jets should honour its debts, but that neither club was to blame for the situation.

Ms McKay said she was confident Hunter Venues had acted appropriately and adequately in its dealings over the stadium.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The best thing would be for the Jets to pay there debt then the Knights could use that money to pay there debt. Then they could take the State Government to court to obtain the money owed due to the loss of earnings from the stadium rebuild. If the Jets don't want to pay for the use of the stadium then they might find that they will be evicted from the stadium. All these problems will go away after the next election as we will have a competent government apposed to the inept one that is running the state.
Posted by BJ, 13/02/2010 7:05:22 AM, on The Herald
Even if the State Government's hands weren't tied, they wouldn't be able to do anything. It seems they cannot make a decision on any thing.
Posted by Steve, 13/02/2010 8:25:39 AM, on The Herald
I'm sure the Knights will make another big announcement the day before the Jets semi-final regarding this... I hope the Knights get pay-back on the eve of any nrl semi-final should they even make it this year!
Posted by raider7, 13/02/2010 8:42:03 AM, on The Herald
Lol at the Knights - backfired coming out now didnt it?
Posted by Paul, 13/02/2010 8:51:10 AM, on The Herald
Monkey See, Monkey Do ! Why pay $300,000 when the knights are withholding payments? If the knights win at abitration, so will the Jets against the knights ! Did the knights give the Jets a rent reduction for the fully unutilised stadium at present? If not why not!
Posted by I see all, 13/02/2010 8:56:45 AM, on The Herald
Jody McKay fails to understand that this is not about rent. This is about payment for services rendered that they have received funds for but are not paying for the supply of. I just can't believe that people fail to see the real issue here - that Con is not paying his bills. I also can't believe that people are so vocal in supporting him in not paying his bills. Amazing.
Posted by AlexMc, 13/02/2010 9:12:41 AM, on The Herald
Wasnt Hunter Venues supposed to sort this? Lets spend more money on an uneeded entity to not solve something else. Our govt is useless.
Posted by Jill, 14/02/2010 10:21:56 AM, on The Herald
as the landlord (yes the people of NSW own the ISC), we should expect that our tennant should pay the rent as agreed or evict them.
Posted by pauly marto, 14/02/2010 1:14:05 PM, on The Herald
The best thing is for the government to stay out of it. Whenever there is something about the stadium and the Knights, Jodi Mckay is always speaking against the Knights. I might be going off my nut saying this, but maybe the Hunter region was better with Michael Costa at the helm. At least he stayed out of matters involving the club.
Posted by Daniel, 10/03/2010 9:17:23 PM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
JODI McKAY
JODI McKAY
 TROUBLES: The EnergyAustralia stadium.
TROUBLES: The EnergyAustralia stadium.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Who's to blame in the Knights v Jets debt dispute?

The Knights
(28%)

The Jets
(28%)

Both of them
(44.1%)

Total Votes: 186
Poll Date: 12 February, 2010

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...