News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Storm over Hunter insurance cover 

Storm over Hunter insurance cover

13 Feb, 2012 07:54 AM
THOUSANDS of Hunter residents could be stung with a 300per cent increase in their annual house insurance premiums, following the NRMA’s introduction of a heavy rain and stormwater levy.

Read the Herald's opinion here.

South Maitland residents Ray and Donna Chipperfield received their bill last week and said they felt physically ill when they saw the annual premium of $1115 for their modest weatherboard house had skyrocketed to $3924.

The NRMA confirmed the company had introduced a levy to cover for damage from stormwater, that is, if a storm causes sudden, excessive water run-off that inundates the property.

Mr Chipperfield said he believed the levy would apply to others in his area as well as those homes throughout Newcastle flooded by stormwater in the Pasha Bulker floods of June 2007.

An NRMA Insurance spokesman could not say which Hunter suburbs faced similar premium increases as each property’s risk was assessed individually.

‘‘We take into account factors such as where a property is built on a block, the height of the building as well as the topography of the area,’’ he said.

‘‘Mr Chipperfield’s premium has increased due to our data analysis showing that his property has a higher risk of being damaged by stormwater run-off.’’

Maitland mayor Peter Blackmore said he was flabbergasted when Mr Chipperfield contacted him.

‘‘There have been extensive drainage works done in the South Maitland area and during the June 2007 storm we didn’t have a problem,’’ Cr Blackmore said.

Mr Chipperfield said water had never entered the Devonshire Street house during the 40 years he had lived there.

He has been insured with the NRMA for 42 years.

Many insurance companies have increased premiums since last year’s floods in Queensland and Victoria and because of the increasing frequency of natural disasters, which are driving up claims.

Insurance Council of Australia spokesman Campbell Fuller said the costs of natural disasters would inevitably have an effect on insurance premiums as companies adjusted their pricing to take into account individual risk levels and the increasing costs of reinsurance.

‘‘Other factors including investment returns also influence premiums,’’ Mr Fuller said. ‘‘The size of any premium change will depend on the insurer.

‘‘Home and contents insurance is a highly competitive market and each insurer’s policies and conditions are different.’’

The federal government wants to standardise the definition of flooding in insurance policies so that it covers water overflowing from any natural watercourse or body of water or from a canal or dam.

The Chipperfields, who live in a flood-prone area, have never had flood insurance as it would cost them about $8000 or $9000 a year in premiums.

A spokesman for GIO Insurance said his company’s flood cover included heavy rain and stormwater damage.

‘‘We do not have a stormwater levy, just the flood cover, which includes that,’’ the spokesman said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Things should be evaluated on individual merit. If you live on high ground, with a sturdy and well maintained home, why should you pay for someone who doesn't?

If councils don't maintain drainage systems and we have paid rates for that service, why should WE have to pay when they fail?

If the insurance just goes up and up, no-one will be able to afford it.

I Can understand the costs to the insurance companies. With all the fires and floods in the last ten years, they have been hit very hard.

We need a sensible approach by ALL, to all these problems.

Posted by Kurri'nRose, 13/02/2012 3:39:51 AM, on The Herald
Consider it a tax on driving your petrol guzzling 4WDs and causing global warming and climate change.
Posted by Wayne of Windale, 13/02/2012 3:48:17 AM, on The Herald
Insurance companies often deserve criticism. They've shown they need to be carefully monitored but as tough as it may seem for some people paying a levy based actual risk is sensible and fair.
Posted by Andrew James, 13/02/2012 4:40:50 AM, on The Herald
This is a massive increase and when you add rate rises etc to the annual bill it is staggering. How do insurance companies, councils etc expect people to be able to pay this. .. an insurance policy of $80 a week. You have to be kidding!!!
Posted by Den Isles, 13/02/2012 4:57:36 AM, on The Herald
Well I guess its time to take the risk and give these companies the flick.
Posted by Garry P, 13/02/2012 6:07:20 AM, on The Herald
yet another reason why lake mac. council is right and the 'we have no idea what we're talking abouts' are wrong.
Posted by just a thought, 13/02/2012 6:09:20 AM, on The Herald
It can only be gouging when other insurance companies are still under $1000 for the same coverage. Especially when the properties have never been flooded. Show your insurer what you think by changing. We found 2 insurers below $1000 for the same coverage for a house in Hamilton.
Posted by Neverwet, 13/02/2012 6:22:33 AM, on The Herald
What happened to the money from when we haven't had floods? Or is that in the CEO's pocket along with the many thousands of people's money who haven't claimed for 40 years and more? I would like to see ICAC investigate each insurance company's policies and put the results on public display.

Glad I live on a hill, shouldn't have to pay a flood levy at all.

Posted by jimbob, 13/02/2012 6:34:32 AM, on The Herald
Many will choose not to insure thus causing even greater problems.

If this were a rental property this should raise the rent about $50 a week.

Posted by Bigfeller, 13/02/2012 6:51:53 AM, on The Herald
Good! These people whose homes are in flood prone areas should be paying much higher premiums.

I researched before buying my house, which is in an area impossible to flood, but my last insurance bill had risen over 25% because of the high amount of flood claims. Why should I pay extra?

Posted by Tony, 13/02/2012 7:04:46 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Ray Chipperfield says water has never entered his Maitland house in the 40 years he has lived there. Picture by Peter Stoop
Ray Chipperfield says water has never entered his Maitland house in the 40 years he has lived there. Picture by Peter Stoop

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...