News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Suits grilled on pay, conduct over suitor 

Suits grilled on pay, conduct over suitor

29 Oct, 2008 07:50 AM
NIB's rejection of a takeover offer and executive salaries were the two big topics at an often-heated annual general meeting yesterday that ran for more than three hours.

About 200 people attended the meeting at Newcastle City Hall, with former federal Liberal Party president and stock exchange chairman John Valder admonishing the company from the floor for its conduct during the takeover bid.

NIB chairman Keith Lynch declined to say when the still-unidentified suitor had made its first approach, but NIB only told the Australian stock exchange on Monday.

The offer had valued NIB at between about $1.15 and $1.20 a share when its stock was trading at about 65 cents.

Almost an hour of the meeting was taken up with debate about the takeover offer, with Mr Valder applauded repeatedly for his attacks on the NIB board, which he called "arrogant".

"It's not what you think it should be worth, it's what it is worth that's the issue here," Mr Valder said.

"Here we are facing a recession or even a depression and you people say that something approaching double the market price is below value.

"How are you going to justify that?"

Australian Shareholders' Association spokesman Will Rogers criticised NIB over some of its results but congratulated it for an executive pay system that linked bonus size to earnings per share.

Other shareholders were not so kind, forcing Mr Lynch to admit that he probably only worked two or three days a week for his $250,000 salary.

Mr Lynch defended the $2.3 million paid to chief executive Mark Fitzgibbon in the year ending June 30, saying it was inflated by a series of "one-off" payments related to NIB's demutualisation and listing on the Australian stock exchange.

Mr Fitzgibbon said it was not for him to say whether his salary was fair or not, but he won support from an otherwise hostile audience when he said: "Intrinsically, I don't believe that I am worth 100 times another person but it's what you can get on the market.

"But I believe [my pay] is totally in line with the market."

Former NIB chairman Col Rogers said Medibank Private was about five or six times the size of NIB but its chief executive was paid $1.153 million.

Mr Lynch said the comparable part of Mr Fitzgibbon's salary amounted to $774,000, which showed the two companies were in line on their executive payments.

Despite the hostile reception from many at the meeting, NIB shareholders voted overwhelmingly in favour of the various board resolutions, including the executive remuneration packages.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The 'good ole boys' sure look after themselves in 'Our Town'. No point in anyone trying to overturn anything at the AGM because the 'deal' is already done with the proxies beforehand at the former mutal health fund and other mutualities. A most interesting process.
Posted by jake 69, 29/10/2008 7:52:46 AM
The whole thing is just obscene. Mr Fitzgibbon is about self -interest: "it's what you can get on the market" is his justifcation of his remuneration. I'd like to know what he can "give" to deserve it apart from a huge devaluation of the company during his time at the helm. I'm thinking that working out the remuneration packages probably took up most of Mr Lynch's 2-day working week for the past year! I think you can count those that have benefited for the demutualisation of NIB on one hand - Just another typical corporate disgrace!!
Posted by unclebarry, 29/10/2008 9:09:18 AM
Considering the financial climate, I would have thought that shareholders would not like paying out big renumeration packagees, and even more so that this would apply to a relatively small company such as NIB. Could some of the out-of-town shareholders who we're told okayed the packages with their proxy votes, please explain how this came about....what moved them to vote this way? I for one would be most interested to hear their opinions.
Posted by Bunny, 29/10/2008 12:08:41 PM
Well if they think they are worth more, than I suggest that they seek employment else where as they are too rich to be employed by a company the size of NIB. See Ya.
Posted by Robert, 29/10/2008 12:11:24 PM
Well thats decided me! We will joining another health insurer. Good bye NIB.
Posted by Dibby, 29/10/2008 2:09:55 PM
Well, I voted against demutualisation because this is PRECISELY what I predicted. How about you? Anyone who ticked the "yes" box on demutualisation for a few hundred dollars worth of shares (now worth half the listing price) has only themselves to blame. TOLD YOU SO. Interesting that exec remuneration can exceed the company's net profit for the year - how good a deal is that? I'm all for payment for reward - and I think Chris Cuffe from Colonial earned and deserved every single one of his $30 million - but this bunch of clowns? Chump change by comparison.
Posted by Scott Hillard, 29/10/2008 4:06:01 PM
I have tried to get The Herald to reprint a profile they published in the H2 on Mark Fitzgibbon some six months or so prior to the vote on the demutualisation. When I read the DM proposal documents I was constantly haunted by Mr Fitzgibbon's personal ambitions outlined in that profile as, in my opinion, they were contrary to the purpose of NIB. I urge The Herald to reprint that profile so it can now be seen in its proper context. I have been a member of NIB for 40 years and got the maximum number of shares. I thought the offer of 85 cents from the company was well over their value at the time of listing so I took the money and remained as a policy holder only. The price apparently surged on listing because the usual institutional investors (whose managers are of the same ilk as the NIB board) were happy to speculate other peoples' (their members') money on future takeover gains. Dibby, you've summed it up beautifully, let's all move to another fund. NIB no longer belongs to the people of Newcastle and the Hunter. One final point, Jodi McKay and Sharon Greirson belong to the same ALP as Kevin Rudd but I don't notice their echoing his views on these obscene salaries on behalf of their constituents. Interesting!
Posted by Dirty Harry, 30/10/2008 12:45:18 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
 FIRING LINE: From left, NIB directors Annette Carruthers and Harold Bentley, chief executive Mark Fitzgibbon, chairman Keith Lynch and chief financial officer Michelle McPherson at the annual general meeting. - Picture by Anita Jones
FIRING LINE: From left, NIB directors Annette Carruthers and Harold Bentley, chief executive Mark Fitzgibbon, chairman Keith Lynch and chief financial officer Michelle McPherson at the annual general meeting. - Picture by Anita Jones
INTEREST: The 200-strong crowd at Newcastle City Hall yesterday.
INTEREST: The 200-strong crowd at Newcastle City Hall yesterday.

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...