News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Tillegra review 'deeply critical' 

Tillegra review 'deeply critical'

28 Sep, 2010 04:00 AM
Hunter Water’s case for Tillegra Dam has been dealt another blow after an independent review rejected the $477million dam as the best way to meet the Hunter Region’s future water needs.

The review, by the economic consultants who advised the federal government on axing Queensland’s Traveston Dam, criticised Hunter Water’s ‘‘limited analytical framework’’ for producing Tillegra as the best option, without adequately exploring alternatives.

Hunter Water’s methodology was outdated, inadequate and lacking in detail, and it did not comprehensively analyse all options, the Centre for International Economics (CIE) told the Department of Planning in a draft review in June.

Hunter Water’s ‘‘zero tolerance’’ of any chance of the region running out of water meant it had failed to adequately consider options with a ‘‘strong chance’’ of resulting in ‘‘a greater improvement in net social welfare compared to Tillegra’’.

‘‘Given the limitations in the analytical framework used by Hunter Water ... we do not support the conclusion that ‘the economic analysis supports the conclusion that Tillegra Dam is the best solution to meet the future water supply needs of the Hunter’.’’

The review recommended a full cost benefit analysis and asked Hunter Water to reconsider other water supply options using a more modern analytical framework, such as that used by Sydney Water in its metropolitan water plan.

The draft review was uncovered in Department of Planning documents tabled after a Greens upper house call for papers.

Greens MP John Kaye said the review was ‘‘severely embarrassing’’ for Hunter Water and the NSW government.

‘‘Planning Minister Tony Kelly will struggle to say that Tillegra has to go ahead in the face of a report that is deeply critical of the project and the planning behind it,’’ Dr Kaye said.

No Tillegra Dam spokeswoman Sally Corbett called on Premier Kristina Keneally to stop further work on the dam. ‘‘The review confirms what community groups have been saying since November 2006 – that Tillegra is not the best solution for the Hunter’s future water needs,’’ Ms Corbett said.

Hunter Water managing director Kevin Young said the CIE review was ‘‘a draft report which Hunter Water has now had the benefit to review’’. The water authority’s response would be incorporated in CIE’s final report.

‘‘There have been claims of better options to provide a secure water supply for our region – yet no one has offered detailed, costed alternatives to Tillegra Dam,’’ Mr Young said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Mr Young - have you looked at other options? The Lostock is always full - Chichester - Grahamstown - I think maybe you should open your eyes. It's our money that is being taken. I cannot understand why we have to pay before it is even given the go-ahead. I believe this is like stealing, because there is nothing solid we are paying for, just foolish ideas. This community is being taxed, more than any other, for something that isn't even going to happen.
Posted by Rose- Lake Macquarie, 28/09/2010 6:28:33 AM, on The Herald
Be very careful when using consultants' reports that justify your point of view. These same consultants advised in the Traveston documents that people were willing to pay up to $190 a year extra in water bills for the privilege of not having water restrictions. Now we have an outcry on the Sunshine Coast because water has, in some cases, tripled. It is obvious they were not the people who were surveyed.
Posted by Mulder, 28/09/2010 6:31:46 AM, on The Herald
The Tillegra dam has never been about the Hunter's water needs. We all know whose needs it is really for, hence the constant contradictions in reports.
Posted by just a thought, 28/09/2010 7:29:47 AM, on The Herald
Mr Young says that no one has offered detailed, costed alternatives to the Tillegra Dam. If Hunter Water and the state government had been more diligent in doing the required analysis, the alternatives would have been discovered.
Posted by Mal NoDam, 28/09/2010 7:37:32 AM, on The Herald
Hunter Water, you've been caught out again by yet another independent review of your assessment process. Your one in 10million drought scenario probability was an absolute howler. Funnily enough, these also seem to be the odds of the Keneally government being re-elected come March. When are we going to hear an end to all the rhetoric and tall tales that the end of our water security is nigh? On the same date that the Keneally government receives its marching orders, March 26, 2011. The 2006 census recorded 220,000 households in the Hunter Region. How about you split the $477million? Allow $2000 per household for retrofitting water tanks to toilets and hot water systems. That will relieve 40 to 70 per cent of current potable water demands throughout your network.
Posted by Watto81, 28/09/2010 8:43:48 AM, on The Herald
If residents are expected to pay for this dam , then they should receive shares in Hunter Water. Hunter Water will make a profit by charging residents for the water they use from this dam - which they paid for.
Posted by tina, 28/09/2010 8:49:15 AM, on The Herald
The Hunter Water website has much information on ways to save water, however there are very few of the latest concepts. The laundry uses 20 per cent of household water but there are now waterless washing machines on the market. If we cut our household water consumption from 185Kl to 50Kl, why would we need the dam?
Posted by Bigfeller, 28/09/2010 8:49:32 AM, on The Herald
Mr Young, perhaps Hunter Water should have fully investigated alternatives to the dam. It is still regarded by many customers as a NSW government attempt to divert attention from Milton Orkopolous.
Posted by Paul Muddle , Dora Ck, 28/09/2010 9:13:17 AM, on The Herald
Not everyone in Dungog is against the dam. Most are for it, except for the very loud voices of a few.
Posted by spoilt23, 28/09/2010 9:15:05 AM, on The Herald
Hunter Water has been caught out again. The NSW government can't give this project the green light now. Tillegra Dam, RIP.
Posted by singing in the rain, 28/09/2010 9:27:51 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
PROPOSAL: An artist's impression of Tillegra dam.
PROPOSAL: An artist's impression of Tillegra dam.

Most popular articles


 
Landcom Sanctuary 190512
 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...