News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Vines from nowhere at Rothbury 

Vines from nowhere at Rothbury

23 May, 2009 04:00 AM
FOSTER'S has won continuing trademark rights to the words Rothbury and Rothbury Estate, preventing Hunter Valley wine growers using it on wine labels to describe where their grapes are grown.

Despite Rothbury having a postcode and appearing on maps as a geographical location, the word can no longer be used on wine labels by anyone but Foster's, a spokesman for the beverage giant confirmed yesterday.

"Our trademark is for the word 'Rothbury' used in certain contexts and for certain things . . . no one can use the word 'Rothbury' by itself, or 'Rothbury Estate'," he said.

Originally, Rothbury Estate was a Len Evans winery, then Foster's bought it and sold it to Michael Hope of Hope Estate, minus a right to the name.

Hunter Valley Wine Industry Association members tried to have Rothbury registered with the Australian Wine and Brandy Corporation as an official wine-growing sub-region, which would allow anyone growing 85 per cent of their produce in the region to use it on wine labels.

But Intellectual Property Australia ruled there was "quite limited use of the word Rothbury" as a place name to designate an "ill-defined area in the Lower Hunter Valley".

"Most people and businesses within the area covered by the proposed geographical indication appear to identify their geographical location by use of the word Pokolbin," the judgement said.

Andrew Thomas, of Hunter Valley Wine Industry Association's wine-making committee, said the decision affected about 40 per cent of the Hunter's grape growers and vineyards.

Geoff Krieger, president of the Hunter Valley Wine Industry Association, said it was taking action to protect other place names such as Belford and Mount View.

"The concerns that the association has always had is that we object to place names being owned by corporations," he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Just change the place name to Rothberry.
Posted by bigfeller, 23/05/2009 9:52:56 AM
what does this mean for made in australia products and labelling if someone chooses to call their product "australia"? oh thats right someone did.
Posted by cobber, 23/05/2009 11:47:50 AM
I think I'll trademark Mayfield.
Posted by shadowboard, 23/05/2009 1:34:37 PM
See http://tinyurl.com/rothbury-riot for other implications of taking a long-used place name with a dark and tragic history.
Posted by Peter Firminger, 23/05/2009 9:42:05 PM
Is this for real? If so I am utterly mortified that Fosters seem to believe that they have a claim to the name of an area,one in wich I grew up in.For Len's sake wake up to your selves.
Posted by Longtimegone, 24/05/2009 10:06:13 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
 SIPPING MAD: Andrew Thomas on Talga Road, Rothbury a location denied to local labels. - Picture by Peter Stoop
SIPPING MAD: Andrew Thomas on Talga Road, Rothbury a location denied to local labels. - Picture by Peter Stoop

Most popular articles


 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...