News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Wind farms still to win over fans 

Wind farms still to win over fans

24 Dec, 2011 03:00 AM

UPPER Hunter residents are more likely to support energy produced from coal than wind farms, government research shows.

A survey of 30,000 Upper Hunter residents found more than half expressed concern about potential noise, environmental and visual impacts resulting from wind farms.

The former Department of Environment and Climate Change conducted the survey last year as part of research for the $200million Kyoto Energy Park near Scone.

Under a new state government proposal announced yesterday, people living within two kilometres of a proposed wind farm would have the right to veto them.

A company wanting to set up a wind farm in an area where landowner consent has not been given will have to go to an independent regional panel if there is community concern.

There are 17 applications to build wind farms in NSW, including 13 that have not been shown to the public.

‘‘Today I am announcing that the NSW Coalition government is putting out for public discussion some of the toughest wind-farm guidelines in the country, possibly the world,’’ Planning Minister Brad Hazzard said.

Most people surveyed about the Kyoto Energy Park said they were aware of it, but many said they were not optimistic about its potential economic and community benefits.

Kyoto Energy Park proponent Pamada plans to install 34 wind turbines in the park, which would be capable of generating 126megawatts of power.

The project received Department of Planning Approval in January 2009, but horse breeders and indigenous groups continue to oppose it. Pamada could not be contacted yesterday but the company recently said that work would begin next year.

The NSW Greens said the proposed planning guidelines would kill off the wind-generation sector in favour of coal seam gas as a solution to the state’s future energy needs.

‘‘If this draft plan becomes law, the government has effectively chosen a destructive coal seam gas future for NSW over the clean, green and jobs-rich wind-energy sector,’’ Greens planning spokesman David Shoebridge said.

But Mr Hazzard said the state remained committed to being part of the federal government’s 20per cent renewable energy target by 2020.

He said the proposed guidelines would help find a balance between residents living near wind turbines and supporters of renewable energy.

The Victorian government this year gave residents within a two-kilometre radius a right of veto over wind turbines.

But Mr Hazzard said the NSW proposal was different and that wind-farm proponents would get a bigger say.

People wishing to write submissions to the NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure have until March 14.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Relocate Mr Shoebridge to a remote location and surround him with a wind farm and then see whether he thinks they are a good idea or not. It's all very well to promote something when the chance of having one of these turbines in your own backyard is remote.
Posted by thinkitthrough, 24/12/2011 3:58:23 AM, on The Herald
Bird choppers. If a mining company accidentally killed a couple of birds the authorities would be all over them and the fines would be big. But these wretched wind turbines can massacre thousands of birds and not a thing happens, and not a peep is made by the Greens. Hypocritical as always.
Posted by Bruce of Newcastle, 24/12/2011 6:08:13 AM, on The Herald
And when their is NO wind, eat baked beans, may as well get coal seam gas without the odour. Give me coal any day and give people employment.
Posted by jimbob, 24/12/2011 6:21:47 AM, on The Herald
A lot of people are not convinced of most of this climate change hysteria. Is it true windfarms onlt generate power 40% of the time. If so, then thousands would be needed to replace one generator at Eraring power station. Please, give us the facts, not glib cliches and rhetoric.
Posted by GetReal., 24/12/2011 6:22:42 AM, on The Herald
And open cut coal mining does not have any visual impact, noise pollution or impact on the surrounding environment????
Posted by Chookman, 24/12/2011 6:41:53 AM, on The Herald
Are the wind farm guidelines part of a set of three?

When will the coal and gas sets be placed on public exhibition?

Posted by Bigfeller, 24/12/2011 6:43:14 AM, on The Herald
The dills rule ... the least polluting form of energy ...
Posted by Tiger, 24/12/2011 7:02:57 AM, on The Herald
This is a massive backward step for renewable energy, and an abandonment of NSW's part in renewable energy targets. There is no other mature/proven technology that will allow RETs to be met.

Will those politicians apply the same rules to coal seam gas (CSG)? Not likely.

I was pleased to see a change of government in NSW, but this is such hogwash I am wondering who is really behind this push.

Disraeli is cited as saying "...lies, damn lies and statistics". Perhaps we could modernise that to "...lies, politics and politicians".

Posted by Hendo, 24/12/2011 7:11:43 AM, on The Herald
Wind farms are the worst polluter of all - visual that is. No matter where they are located they are a blight on the landscape. At least with coal mining the craters cannot be seen from ground level and gas extraction plants can have trees planted around them to make them visually attractive.
Posted by cardiffresident, 24/12/2011 7:14:01 AM, on The Herald
What sheer hypocrisy! If it was a coal mine or, more importantly, a CGS drilling well, a local landowner would have no say in the matter. The state government would most likely say "yes" & that'd be it. Just ask Ian Moore at Jerrys Plains. Likewise the CSG operators get whatever they want & even threaten the long established $1billion wine industry. But non-polluting wind farms are so dangerous we can't have then anywhere near someone, even though coal mines can be right under them & a CSG well right beside them. Great Christmas present for the kids!
Posted by DMA, 24/12/2011 7:14:43 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
 BALANCING ACT: Wind farms, like this one in Western Australia, would be subject to stricter planning controls in NSW. Below, the area proposed for a wind farm near Scone.
BALANCING ACT: Wind farms, like this one in Western Australia, would be subject to stricter planning controls in NSW. Below, the area proposed for a wind farm near Scone.

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...