News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Yes Minister, one more Hunter transport report on the way 

Yes Minister, one more Hunter transport report on the way

01 Dec, 2009 04:00 AM
IT'S the picture that says a thousands words about transport planning in the Hunter.

There's plenty of it, evidenced by a pile of reports on the subject since 2003, but little action to match, the Hunter Business Chamber says.

Chamber chief executive Peter Shinnick has counted 43 documents either about transport in the Hunter or which refer to regional transport infrastructure projects.

The State Government has generated most of the reports, but contributors include local and federal government and business and transport groups.

"It says a lot about a government's decision-making process that a cursory search turns up this many reports, but we've got little else to show for it," Mr Shinnick said.

The completed documents include the Lower Hunter Transport Needs Study, which cost $1 million including $200,000 from the State Government and recommended public transport projects and the construction of the Hunter Expressway.

Another is a $125,000 draft Lower Hunter Integrated Transport Strategy, produced as part of the Lower Hunter Regional Strategy process in 2005.

It was never officially released, to be joined on a shelf later that year by a $59,000 Public Transport in the Lower Hunter: A Five Year Plan that was also dumped.

The next year, a Hunter Transport Taskforce report found the Newcastle rail line should stay, and was followed with a Warabrook Terminus and Modified Light Rail Investigation that cost about $500,000.

Mr Shinnick said it was time for the State Government to make a decision.

The Government has defended the latest round of reports as necessary to identify the true cost and feasibility of a Wickham interchange and measures to support city revitalisation.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Watch as this bizarre game is played on past the 2011 State election. This is the only hope to save Labor candidate for Newcastle Jodi McKay from being defeated.
Posted by Jethro, 1/12/2009 4:33:38 AM
The only people that fear a review of information anytime are those that have something to hide. Always look for those that are jumping at the bit, they are the mavericks that will lead you into trouble without knowing (or in some cases not wanting to know) what the best way forward is. The signs of a shoplifter are so easy to spot as is the signs of a businessperson on an agenda to make himself a lot of money. The money and right to make it are ok , but its done by the grace of the community and its instrument -the government. Then and only then is it allowed when it provides solutions , broad reaching solutions and with complete knowledge and disclosure of consequences. Some of this posturing is to do with speculation as approvals mean trading in those approvals -not building things that are beneficial. Why should that be done carefully and slowly -easy to sort out the good from the bad, the right from the wrong and also to distill that showpiece of paper down to something that is easly understood as the right thing to do without being baffled by bulldust. If peter cant tell us whats in all those reports and how each thing is relevent in it -he has no right to hold them.
Posted by agenda, 1/12/2009 7:08:46 AM
when this latest examination of the past reports is done along with any new relevent information (GFC , changing transport requirements , new technologies evolving,carbon trading and a smaller economy then and only then that should be given to a peer review process of fully independent experts from afar for their opinions. If fact Copanhagen may have an effect as will unfolding knowledge of the effects of a warmer planet. No take all the time you need, its not as if the world will end if you have to be very diligent, prudent and have true providance in mind. Who would ague that these things are to be thrown to the wind? Watch out for the posturing, strutting and circus antics that are meant to distract from the real carefull examination of costs and effects. As the big developer says -"just trust me , I know whats best". yeh right - but for who? If mr big developer you find offence to that you have no-one to blame but yourselve as what is your track record? OH, after the new review is done, reported and studied then it should be given to peer review panel of detached experts for scrutiny on its robustness. Or developers just agree now to underwrite all costs of change? risky?
Posted by reporttous, 1/12/2009 7:23:07 AM
Mr. Shinnick - successive state governments have made the decision and the result is there for all to see. The problem is that people such as yourself refuse to accept that. Stop this nonsense now and move on with issues that matter before you tear what is left of this community apart.
Posted by Nobbys Head, 1/12/2009 8:22:30 AM
i have to get into the report business. what a great way to make money and for politicians to play smoke and mirrors. dont any one move too quickly.
Posted by fuxourcity, 1/12/2009 8:43:24 AM
The only transport plan should be how to fill the trains and buses with the tourists in order to fuel revitalisation. Buses with only 1.5 people carried per km travelled are far worse than trains ending long routes with low passenger numbers. Making use of modern cars more user friendly and efficient is also an essential part of a transport plan.
Posted by Bigfeller, 1/12/2009 8:58:06 AM
Bigfeller, google the words lightrail proposals Australia which will show you factual costs to such projects ie: Gold Coast was 17km construction of light rail and vechiles to the cost of $395 million dollars. Now do yourself a favour bigfeller and work this out $395 million divided by 17km = $23.2 million dollars per/km. And you want lightrail on disused rail lines as I read before?
Posted by what the ??, 1/12/2009 5:09:31 PM
Peter Shinnick, I wouldn't be surprised to see you as a candidate in an election soon.
Posted by RIP_Newy, 1/12/2009 8:31:22 PM
Once the business community realises that it has to support the community infrastructure and not do us in with the NSW State Shovernment then shall a good deed shine in a weary weary world.
Posted by regretswevehadafew, 1/12/2009 10:45:41 PM
I wish the business people would stop blaming all the woes of the city on the train line and invest their time, money and hope into an iconic (Newcastle Opera House) style building/sculpture for Newcastle. See the wonder work of Uni of Newcastle 5th Year Architecture students for 2009 for some ideas. See Andrew Cavill's 'Midden' Interpretive and Discovery Centre for Coal River. Invest in that and attract people here to see wonderful things, as opposed to a bunch of wreckers of rail lines. Leave the rail line alone, it has suffered enough, building an Opera House', support your young geniuses. Cut the crap.
Posted by John Dig, 1/12/2009 11:01:04 PM
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
PAPER CHASE: The Hunter Business Chamber's Peter Shinnick.- Picture by Simone De Peak
PAPER CHASE: The Hunter Business Chamber's Peter Shinnick.- Picture by Simone De Peak
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
01 December, 2009

Most popular articles

Travelworld_See the World
 
 
Kloster No 1. Car Sale
 
Hunter Water_Leaking
 
Scholarships
 
Hamilton St Patricks Day
 
School Newspaper Competition
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...