News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 You may end up paying to use Mount Sugarloaf 

You may end up paying to use Mount Sugarloaf

02 Jul, 2009 04:00 AM
THE public could end up having to pay to use Mount Sugarloaf, with Lake Macquarie City Council and the NSW Government in a wrangle over who should manage and maintain the area.

The council spends about $90,000 a year to manage an area of the reserve, but it wants to hand that responsibility to the State Government.

The council had no way of raising money to cover its costs, but the Government makes money from the reserve by leasing land for transmission towers and charging groups to use the area.

A council report said the National Parks and Wildlife Service was charging groups for visits.

Not a cent of that money went to the council, despite the groups using council-maintained car parks, toilets, picnic areas and barbecues.

The report said the wildlife service "may choose to charge an entry fee into the Mount Sugarloaf picnic area", if it took control of the reserve's amenities.

Conversely, the wildlife service had indicated it "was not interested in managing or maintaining" the amenities, a council report said. There was a risk the area would deteriorate if the council handed the land to the Government, the report said.

The council had been manager of 450 hectares of the Mount Sugarloaf reserve area, but the Government recently changed the arrangement.

Crown land and State Forests were joined to create the 4000-hectare Sugarloaf State Conservation Area.

The council was left to manage eight hectares, the most costly part of the area to maintain because it contains the majority of amenities.

"It is logical to have one land manager," council recreation and land planner Brad Sutton said.

"We'd like to hand the land back to the State Government."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Where is the State member Kerry Hickey? Why doesn't he have anything to say about this? He is just another time serving seat warmer, enjoying the free lunches at parliament house.
Posted by Jim, 2/07/2009 6:04:44 AM
It would be a lovely day out for the weekend detainies or work for the unemployed. A very good project for the community.
Posted by chris broadmedow, 2/07/2009 6:26:00 AM
Their certainly should be a charge. The revenue helps make the facilities better and more enjoyable.
Posted by Bigfeller, 2/07/2009 8:23:34 AM
Hold on a minute, what do I pay my rates for? For years I've been to it's more than just roads, garbage and libraries. How about LMCC get on with providing a few park facilities for ratepayers, or is it only the parks and amenities around the lake that count?
Posted by Maxwell Smart, 2/07/2009 9:12:02 AM
I say to the Council. Dump paying for Sugarloaf. Lets shift some of the cost back to the State Fat Cats in Macquarie Street. Let's start pressuring the Buffoons to perform. Carr, Iemma and now Rees. You have too be kidding!
Posted by angryman, 2/07/2009 9:54:56 AM
The combination of council rates, water rates, electricity and car registration take almost two months of my net annual income. I have long suspected I am subsidising other people's lifestyles. Perhaps everything should be user pays then we would really know who is fair dinkum about the services and facilities they request.
Posted by shadowboard, 2/07/2009 10:04:18 AM
Sort it out. Everyday I am sick of reading these ridiculous arguments and blame pushing. We have so many wonderful natural resources in our area, and every day someone keeps telling us we have to pay for it. How ridiculous to pay a fee to go to Mt Sugarloaf.
Posted by Jordo, 2/07/2009 10:19:04 AM
The National Sparks And Wildfires couldnt run a choko vine over an outhouse,they are a joke.
Posted by yep, 2/07/2009 10:33:37 AM
What has happened to our society and government at all levels? For decades governments were able to build roads, develop infrastructure, provide amenities and amply serve society, without the need to continually ask us to pay more and more. Now governments (or their established corporations) cry poor every day, bicker with each other about responsibility, provide deteriorating services (despite population increase and improvements in technology) and want to charge us for services and amenities they have provided for decades for free or at low cost. Recent plans to charge for Blackbutt, now Sugarloaf, parking metres in the City, 20% increases in electricity. Everything goes up and up yet the services we receive go backwards. What is the problem here?
Posted by What Happened to Goverment, 2/07/2009 11:30:40 AM
If National Parks are able to look after and improve the facilities of Glenrock without thee public having to pay an entry fee then why not Sugarloaf?
Posted by Nudge, 2/07/2009 12:14:08 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
 COSTLY: Brad Sutton at Mount Sugarloaf reserve yesterday.- Picture by Peter Stoop
COSTLY: Brad Sutton at Mount Sugarloaf reserve yesterday.- Picture by Peter Stoop
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Would you pay to visit the Mount Sugarloaf nature reserve?

Yes
(17.2%)

No
(82.8%)

Total Votes: 157
Poll Date: 01 July, 2009

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...