News 
 Local News 
 Sport 
 Football - Soccer 
 FFA must give money men bigger hand in running A-League 

FFA must give money men bigger hand in running A-League

23 Feb, 2012 08:24 AM
IT seems obvious that the men putting up the cash, including Jets owner Nathan Tinkler, should have a say in the A-League.

The issue has been bubbling along for months and came to a head when Gold Coast owner Clive Palmer launched a scathing attack last weekend on Football Federation Australia’s administration of the league.

Moves are afoot to form an owners’ association at a meeting next week and Hunter Sports Group chief executive Troy Palmer will be front and centre.

To read Melbourne Age journalist Archie Fraser's opinion piece, click here.

The Jets are aggrieved on a number of fronts. They have threatened legal action against the governing body over claims Tinkler was overcharged millions for his A-League licence.

Palmer, whose club joined the A-League in 2009-10, told SBS TV on Monday night: ‘‘We paid $500,000 for our licence. Poor old Nathan Tinkler had to fork out $7million for his licence.’’

The real figure is closer to $4million.

The Jets insist they were told the fee was standard. But it has since become apparent that, at the time he bought the club, Tinkler was the only owner to have been charged a multimillion-dollar amount.

FFA responded by saying the money was an acquisition fee and not a licence fee. They pointed to the fact that, unlike Gold Coast, the Jets were an established club with a history.

A history of losing money.

Former owner Con Constantine had dropped at least $15million before running out of money to finance the club beyond August 2010.

FFA, which was already financing Adelaide, North Queensland and Central Coast and could not afford to fund the Jets over the long haul, approached Tinkler.

The Jets were insolvent, FFA had paid players’ wages for six weeks and the club had next to no sponsorship, 800 members and average crowds of 6000.

Given the dire situation, the takeover was done in days. There was limited time to conduct due diligence. In any case, Constantine’s financial records were not forthcoming.

The issue of the licence fee poses many questions. Where did the money go? Should Constantine, who built the brand and poured millions into it, have received a percentage? Why were the new owners of Perth and Adelaide, which changed hands in 2009 and 2010 respectively, not charged multimillion-dollar fees?

The A-League’s Fox Sports TV deal, which requires a team in every capital city, might have reduced FFA’s bargaining power in those markets.

The Jets are expected to wait until legal action against FFA over the Jason Culina insurance fiasco is settled before deciding whether they will pursue the fee in court. The Culina matter goes before an arbitrator on March 5.

Apart from the licence issue, there are other areas of concern for the Jets.

They are expected to return an operating loss of about $4million. Tinkler is committed to the club but does not believe the A-League’s commercial model is sustainable.

FFA seems to be listening and has begun developing a better model for consultation with owners.

It is the least they deserve.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I can't believe that the FFA don't have a graded scale for ownership of a club. eg. new club $x, existing club - not making a profit $xx, existing club - profit making add an x for each year of profit. They can't charge one fee for one person and a different fee for a multi-millionaire.
Posted by tinag, 23/02/2012 8:50:29 AM, on The Herald
There's those words again - Due Diligence
Posted by sparra, 23/02/2012 8:51:21 AM, on The Herald
Surely this would put Troy Palmer or whoever agreed to the fee under some scrutiny at HSG. Where was the due diligence?

As for an owners association, I couldn't agree more.

Posted by Hmm, 23/02/2012 11:12:03 AM, on The Herald
The Gold Coast?

$500,000?

Lucky they got that much.

Posted by crazy eddie, 23/02/2012 11:41:28 AM, on The Herald
Of course, Mr Westfields, the billionaire who controls FFA, has not been prepared to put any of his money into the A League.

Great article James, which highlights the rubbishy spin that comes from the people running the game.

Posted by chicken little, 23/02/2012 12:19:57 PM, on The Herald
Stick it to em NT. Gorman and Buckley are NOT worth there remuneration packages. Heaven help them if they had to survive in the real world.
Posted by Steeler, 23/02/2012 2:47:02 PM, on The Herald
Chicken little.... perhaps a little more care should be taken when questioning 'Mr Westfields' financial committment to the code.

It isn't called the Westfield W League for no reason.

Or the Westfield Young Matildas.

Or the Westfield Womens U17's

Oh and there is of course the actual Westfield Matildas.

Then there is the advertsing purchased by Westfield at all Austrlian Socceroos games and A-League matches.


Posted by demon_aus, 24/02/2012 8:12:32 AM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Picture by Michele Mossop
Picture by Michele Mossop
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...